🔻سی ان ان: ارتش آمریکا ۸۰ درصد از موشک های رهگیر را در جنگ با ایران مصرف کرده است 🔹شبکه خبری سی ان ان گزارش داد که ارتش آمریکا در جنگ علیه ایران حدود ۸۰ درصد از موشک های رهگیر مهم خود را مصرف کرده است. 🔹براساس این گزارش و به گفته ۲ منبع آگاه، ارتش آمریکا تقریباً چهار پنجم از موجودی موشکهای سامانه تاد و تقریباً نیمی از موشک های رهگیر پاتریوت خود را از زمان شروع جنگ مصرف کرده است.| ایرنا @EghtesadNews_com

Channel
وکیل مدافع
@vakilmodafe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,394subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001006983114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vakilmodafe |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vakilmodafe |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 1,394 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 1,395 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 1,398 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 1,399 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 1,399 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.54%
- avg views ÷ 1,394 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 35.5
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 709 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
📌 ترامپ دوباره ایران را تهدید به حملات نظامی کرد 🔹«ممکن است [توافقی باشد]، ممکن است نباشد... ما آماده حمله بودیم. در زندگی واقعی، آنها میدانند چه زمانی آماده حمله هستید و چه زمانی فقط بلوف میزنید ... و ما اگر مجبور باشیم آماده حمله هستیم!» eghtesadonline.com @eghtesadonline
🔻مشاجره لفظی ترامپ و وزیر جنگ آمریکا بر سر بحران مهمات و درگیری با ایران 🔹واشنگتن پست فاش کرد که اختلاف نظر رئیس جمهور و وزیر جنگ آمریکا بر سر بحران مهمات، موشکها و جنگ با ایران به مشاجره لفظی انجامید. 🔹المنار لبنان به نقل از روزنامه واشنگتن پست افزود که «دونالد ترامپ» رئیس جمهور آمریکا در جریان جلسهای در کمپ دیوید که در هفته گذشته برگزار شد با «پیت هگست» وزیر جنگ آمریکا مشاجره لفظی انجام داد.| ایرنا @EghtesadN…
🔻شنیده شدن صدای ۲ انفجار در یک نفتکش در حال عبور از تنگه هرمز 🔹سازمان عملیات تجارت دریایی انگلیس(UKMTO) اعلام کرد که گزارشی از شنیده شدن صدای ۲ انفجار در یک نفتکش در حال عبور از تنگه هرمز دریافت کرده است. 🔹ناخدای یک نفتکش از شنیدن صدای ۲ انفجار در حین عبور از تنگه هرمز خبر داده است. 🔹این گزارش تأیید میکند که خدمه و کشتی در سلامت هستند. @EghtesadNews_com
سازمان عملیات تجارت دریایی بریتانیا (UKMTO): ناخدای یک نفتکش گزارش داد که هنگام عبور از تنگه هرمز، صدای دو انفجار را شنیده است./انتخاب @Entekhab_ir
العربی الجدید به نقل از سازمان عملیات تجارت دریایی بریتانیا (UKMTO): گزارشی درباره یک حادثه در ۹ مایل دریایی جنوبشرقی کمزار در سلطنت عمان دریافت شده است./انتخاب @Entekhab_ir
فاکس نیوز: ما مدام میشنویم که در مورد ایران پیشرفتهایی حاصل شده، اما بعد میشنویم که هیچ پیشرفتی وجود ندارد. جمهوریخواهان دوران بوش دارند به سراغ شما میآیند و میگویند که حالا این مسئله دیگر مسئولیت شماست. ونس: اگر آنها میخواهند مسئولیت تلاش برای به پایان رساندن موفقیتآمیز این جنگ را بر عهده من بگذارند، من از این موضوع خوشحال هستم و آن را میپذیرم. ایرانیها افراد دشواری هستند./انتخاب @Entekhab_ir
📌رویترز به نقل از منابع: ایران به کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس هشدار داده که هرگونه حمله جدید آمریکا با پاسخ متقابل علیه زیرساختهای حیاتی انرژی در سراسر منطقه روبهرو خواهد شد eghtesadonline.com @eghtesadonline
♦️ ادعای والاستریتژورنال: 🔹 بر اساس پیشنویس توافق ایران و عمان نظارت بر تردد کشتیها به خلیج فارس در اختیار تهران قرار میگیرد، اما ایران عوارض یا هزینههای خدماتی دریافت نمیکند 🔹 طرفین این توافق را با آمریکا، کشورهای منطقه و مقامات ارشد ایران که هنوز باید آن را تأیید کنند، به اشتراک گذاشتهاند جزئیات در👇👇 https://www.entekhab.ir/003uv5 🆔 @Entekhab_ir
♦️ رویترز به نقل از منابع: 🔹 ایران به کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس هشدار داده که هرگونه حمله جدید آمریکا با پاسخ متقابل علیه زیرساختهای حیاتی انرژی در سراسر منطقه روبهرو خواهد شد 🔹 این هشدار در جریان مجموعهای از تماسهای دیپلماتیک سطح بالا منتقل شد 🔹 پیام عراقچی در تمام تماسها یکسان بود: «ما برای پاسخ متقابل آمادهایم، اما یافتن یک راهحل دیپلماتیک بهترین راه برای ویرانی گسترده در منطقه است» / انتخاب جزئیات در👇👇 h…
🔴رویترز به نقل از پنج منبع: ایران به کشورهای خلیج فارس هشدار داد که هرگونه حمله جدید آمریکا به خاک این کشور، باعث تلافیجویی علیه زیرساختهای حیاتی انرژی در سراسر منطقه خواهد شد. سپاه سایبری پاسداران👇🏻 ☑️ @SEPAHCYBERY
نشریه آمریکایی فارن پالیسی: سعودیها خود را میان ایران و انصارالله محاصره میبینند؛ این وضعیت تا حدی نتیجه رئیسجمهور نالایق آمریکاست. 🔹هیچیک از همسایگان عرب سعودی برای کمک پیشقدم نشدهاند؛ چراکه بیشتر آنها برای مقابله با تهدید انصارالله بسیار ضعیف هستند. سپاه سایبری پاسداران👇🏻 ☑️ @SEPAHCYBERY
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @vakilmodafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 691,374 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@entekhab_ir · 206,5276 postsاقتصاد آنلاین
@eghtesadonline · 75,1554 postsاقتصادنیوز
@Eghtesadnews_com · 87,4113 postsفارس بینالملل و سیاست خارجی
@FarsNewsInt · 42,7571 postجریان
@Jarian_com · 1,232,7711 postخط انرژی
@khate_energy · 38,5061 postخبرگزاری تسنیم
@Tasnimnews · 2,469,3031 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@vakilmodafe named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 10 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“وکیل مدافع” (@vakilmodafe), 1,394 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vakilmodafe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.