Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مدرسه علوم جنایی

Channel

مدرسه علوم جنایی

@CriminalSciencesSchool

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,551subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001130776928
TypeChannel
Username@CriminalSciencesSchool
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CriminalSciencesSchool

Growth

4,5484,5554,551.56 August 2026 — 4,555 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,555 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,548 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,550 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,551 subscribers4,5516 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,547–4,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 07:224,551+1
13 Aug 2026, 02:564,550+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:124,548-7
7 Aug 2026, 11:184,555no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:454,555first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.92%
avg views ÷ 4,551 subscribers
Avg views / post
315
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held19 (23 June 202626 July 2026)
Views total315
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 06:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 20s
Average length
3m 20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

152 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎6643.4%
2717.8%
👌159.87%
👏159.87%
💔159.87%
👍149.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC315 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#آخرین_پست_کانال_مدرسه_علوم_جنایی_در_تلگرام ✅ با سلام و احترام، بعد از این، فقط در پیام‌رسان ایرانیِ#بله فعالیت می‌کنیم و کانال تگرامی ما برای همیشه تعطیل می‌شود و فعالیت نخواهد کرد. لینک کانال مدرسه‌ی علوم جنایی در پیام‌رسان #بله: https://ble.ir/criminalsciencesschool سپاس از همراهی و یاری همگی عزیزان و مدیران محترم در این حدود هشت سال حلال‌مون بفرمایید بابت هر بدی که کردیم. خداوند یار و نگه‌دارتان. "الل

👎28👍62💔2

Signed Mohajer

29 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,630 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#آخرین_پست_کانال_مدرسه_علوم_جنایی_در_تلگرام ✅ با سلام و احترام، بعد از این، فقط در پیام‌رسان ایرانیِ#بله فعالیت می‌کنیم و کانال تگرامی ما برای همیشه تعطیل می‌شود و فعالیت نخواهد کرد. لینک کانال مدرسه‌ی علوم جنایی در پیام‌رسان #بله: https://ble.ir/criminalsciencesschool سپاس از همراهی و یاری همگی عزیزان و مدیران محترم در این حدود هشت سال حلال‌مون بفرمایید بابت هر بدی که کردیم. خداوند یار و نگه‌دارتان. "الل

👎21👏134

Signed Mohajer

29 Jun 2026, 14:22 UTC992 viewsread 12 August 2026

چندی پیش در یک دست دوم فروشی، این کتاب ارزشمند را یافتیم. کار خیلی قوی به نظر می‌رسید. بحث‌های ارزشمندی دارد. این پیام استاد انصاری عزیز سبب شد تا بیش از پیش ارزش این اثر نمایان شود. جالب است که استادی از مغرب زمین این‌چنین عمیق در آثار اخلاقی و ادبی ایران و مشرق زمین تحقیق و تفحص نموده باشند. ما خیلی خیلی از میراث فکری غنی خود غافل شدیم. گاهی دچار خودتحقیری شدیم. خدایش رحمت فرماید.

Signed Mohajer

29 Jun 2026, 14:17 UTC891 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @azbarresihayetarikhiPhoto

شارل هانری دو فوشه‌کور دار فانی را وداع گفت. استاد برجسته ادب و زبان فارسی در فرانسه که چند نسل از شاگردان را تربيت کرد و در ترویج زبان فارسی و معرفی ادبيات فارسی و ایران در فرانسه نقشی تقريبا بی بديل داشت. من به زمان تدريس او در اينالکو و يا سوربون جديد نرسيدم اما در چند سخنرانی او حضور داشتم. کتاب اخلاقيات او اثر بسيار مفيد و ممتازی است. نمونه کم نظيری از پژوهش در فرهنگ و عقل و نظام اخلاق ايرانی است. اين اثر را مقا

Signed Mohajer

28 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC811 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

📣 انجمن علوم قضائی ایران، وزارت دادگستری، انجمن علمی دانشجویی حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، مرکز دیپلماسی جوانان، مرکز وکلای قوه قضائیه و جمعی از نهادهای علمی و حقوقی کشور برگزار می‌کنند: 📄 نشست علمی «کودکان، جنگ و عدالت» 🔹از حمایت حقوقی غیرنظامیان تا مسئولیت نهادهای بین‌المللی و منطقه‌ای 🕊 با حضور جمعی از خانواده‌های دانش‌آموزان جان‌باخته در حادثه مدرسه شجره طیبه میناب 🎤 سخنرانان (به ترتیب ارائه): 👤#دکتر_عسکر_جلالیان

👏2

Signed Mohajer

28 Jun 2026, 17:49 UTC653 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

افسوس که در اغلب کتاب‌های حقوق بین‌الملل کیفری اصلی، نه یک فصل، که گاه حتی یک صفحه و حتی یک سطر و حتی یک پاورقی هم از جنایات سردشت سخن نگفته‌ایم. انگار نه انگار که ملت ما قربانی این جنایات بین‌المللی شده و ما باید پیش از همه و بیش از همه، این قضایا را تبدیل به بخشی از گفتمان‌های حقوقی و پیراحقوقی کنیم و با زبان علمی طرح نماییم. این در حالی است که خود جنایات سردشت، به تنهایی نیاز به یک نیم‌سال تدریس در دوره‌ی تحصیلات

1

Signed Mohajer

28 Jun 2026, 17:47 UTC667 viewsread 12 August 2026

اگر امروز این متن را بازنویسی شود، "جنایت تجاوز نظامی" را نباید از قلم انداخت، زیرا وقتی اصل حمله‌ی نظامی، نامشروع باشد، تک‌تک حملات نظامی کشور متجاوز نیز، پیش از هر چیز، بخشی از جنایت تجاوز نظامی به‌شمار خواهند آمد.

Signed Mohajer

28 Jun 2026, 17:44 UTC662 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

#بازنشر ایران و حقوق بین‌المللی کیفری: تاملی در جنایات شیمیایی سردشت الف) در ۷ تیر ۱۳۶۶ خ. رژیم بعث اقدام به بمباران شیمیایی شهر سردشت و مزارع و محیط‌‌زیست پیرامون آن نمود که منجر به کشتار غیرنظامیان، ایراد آسیب‌های جسمی و روحی شدید، شیوع بیماری‌، تخریب مزارع و باغ‌ها، ویرانی شهر، تخریب زیرساخت‌های شهری، آلودگی محیط‌زیست، آسیب به دام‌ها و... شد. ب) از منظر حقوق بین‌الملل کیفری این رفتارهای غیرانسانی رژیم بعث می‌تو

Signed Mohajer

28 Jun 2026, 03:32 UTC639 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ورودِ مفهومِ «اِکوساید» به گفتمان های رسمیِ نظامِ حکمرانیِ ایران ۱_ پس از اینکه مفهومِ *«اِکوساید»* توانست با سرعتی بسیار زیاد و در سطحی بسیار گسترده و جهانی، جایی برای خود در حوزة گفتمان های علمی و دانشگاهی پیدا کند و استادان و پژوهشگران پرشماری نیز به مطالعه و بررسی ابعاد گوناگون آن بپردازند، وقوع تجاوز نظامیِ امریکا و اسرائیل و متحدّان این دو رژیمِ تروریستی به ایران و ایراد آسیب های شدید به محیط زیست ایران و زی

2

Signed Mohajer

26 Jun 2026, 22:22 UTC700 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @rezanasrichannel

ترجمه: ادعای ترامپ مبنی بر اینکه «موشک‌ها همه‌جا بر فراز میناب در حال پرواز بودند» مضحک است. مدرسه در همان روز نخست جنگ هدف قرار گرفت؛ پیش از آنکه ایران حتی یک گلوله تلافی‌جویانه شلیک کرده باشد. آسمان هرمزگان در آن صبح تنها میزبان موشک‌های یک کشور بود؛ موشک‌های آمریکایی. روزنامه نیویورک تایمز، شبکه سی‌ان‌ان، سازمان عفو بین‌الملل و چندین تحقیق مستقل همگی به این نتیجه رسیده‌اند این حمله با استفاده از موشک کروز تاما

💔21

Signed Mohajer

26 Jun 2026, 07:17 UTC728 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✅ روزی برای هم‌جنس‌بازان! یکی از مصادیق فاحش "جاهلیت مدرن" همین است که به‌نام حقوق بشر، به‌نام آزادی، به‌نام انسانیت، کاری شیطانی و غیرعقلانی و غیرطبیعی را که خلاف طبیعت آدمی است و خلاف عقل و منطق است و حتی حیوانات هم خلاف طبیعت خود دانسته و انجام نمی‌دهند، انجام داده و به این جهل و انحراف خود می‌بالند و به جرم خود لباس "حق" پوشانده و مشروعیت می‌بخشند. ✅ این انحراف جاهلی آن اندازه در نگاه خدای متعال سنگین بوده است

👌15👎7

Signed Mohajer

25 Jun 2026, 15:14 UTC754 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

اَلوِتر المَوتُور: آنچنان تنها ماند؛ تنهای تنهای تنهای تنها ...... «یُقتَلُ 1- عَطشاناً 2- غَریباً 3- وحیداً 4- فریداً، 5- لَیسَ لَهُ ناصِرُ و لا مُعینٌ» .... «اللّهم العن قتلة الحسین (علیه السلام)»

💔11👎1

Signed Mohajer

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @CriminalSciencesSchool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,007,143 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

✳️ پایگاه خبری اختبار
@ekhtebar · 106,298
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مدرسه علوم جنایی” (@CriminalSciencesSchool), 4,551 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CriminalSciencesSchool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.