Channel
@FuseAnnouncements
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,528subscribers
-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001346780794 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @FuseAnnouncements |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/FuseAnnouncements |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 12,528 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:18 | 12,537 | -13 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 12,550 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 12,558 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 12,574 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 12,578 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:01 | 12,584 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 12,591 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 12,591 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 45 | 63.4% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 11.3% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 5.63% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 5.63% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.82% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Yield on USDC is currently sitting at 9.4% That’s not something to ignore. Put your idle USDC to work and start earning today. Get it 👉 SOLID APP Website | Twitter | Telegeram
🔥2
Solid got even closer to you. Solid mobile app is live 🟢 Your Solid experience, now in your pocket. Download 👉 SOLID APP Website | Twitter | Telegeram
⚡1🔥1
Launching a loyalty program shouldn't require a development team. On Fuse, businesses can launch: ☕ Loyalty tokens 💵 Branded stablecoins 🤖 AI-managed rewards programs With transaction fees of just $0.0001, rewarding thousands of customers costs less than a cup of coffee. Read more 👇 https://news.fuse.io/launch-a-loyalty-token-or-branded-stablecoin-for-your-business/ Website | Twitter | Solid
👏2⚡1
Fuse staking discussions are moving forward . The current plan explores allocating 50M FUSE in rewards to support Validators and Solid stakers, helping strengthen participation and align incentives across the ecosystem. Join the discussion and help shape what comes next for Fuse 👉 https://x.com/Fuse_network/status/2061761151999136028?s=20 Website | Twitter | Solid
👍1🔥1
Meet Solid Agent Wallet 🟢 Turn your Solid account into a secure payment layer for AI agents. Let Claude, ChatGPT, or any autonomous system make x402 payments on your behalf, without ever touching your private keys. Details here 👇 https://news.fuse.io/fuse-now-has-a-native-agent-wallet-it-earns-yield/ Website | Twitter | Solid
🔥3
What if building a blockchain app was as simple as describing it? With the Fuse MCP Server, any AI assistant can connect directly to Fuse Network and: → Query wallets & transactions → Deploy ERC-20 tokens → Execute swaps → Build payment products No blockchain integration code required. Connect your LLM. Describe what you want to build. Let the AI handle the rest. Read more 👇 https://news.fuse.io/how-to-build-on-…
🔥4
While other EVM chains charge $0.01–$5 per transaction, Fuse charges just $0.0001. That means: → 100,000 payments = $10 in network fees → ~2-second finality → Zero downtime since 2019 → 135M+ transactions processed When you're building payroll, remittances, loyalty programs, or payment apps, cost matters. That's why products like Solid and Freedom Wallet run on Fuse. Read more 👇 https://news.fuse.io/evm-compatibl…
❤🔥2
FRC04: Staking Model Proposal 🆕 The team is currently evaluating a new staking model for FUSE as network inflation continues to decline. The direction being evaluated includes: > clearer separation between stakers and validators > treasury-funded rewards to bridge the transition from inflation > protocol revenue distributions for stakers as the long-term reward source Check more below ⬇️ https://forum.fuse.io/t/fr…
🔥4
The Solid Card is now accepted wherever Visa is accepted. 🌍 Spend at 175M+ Visa merchants worldwide with Apple Pay, Google Pay, and earn 3% cashback on qualifying purchases. Terms apply. 🟢🟢 Earn. Spend. Keep your crypto working 🟢🟢 Full breakdown 👉 https://www.solid.xyz/post/the-new-solid-card-is-here Website | Twitter | Telegeram
🔥3
AI agents can now make micropayments at scale. Agents need to pay for data, APIs, services, and digital resources autonomously. That means millions of micropayments happening every day. That's a completely new category of economic activity, and it needs infrastructure built for high-volume, low-cost transactions. That's why Fuse is now live with x402, The payment layer for the agent economy.🟢 Full breakdown ⬇️ h…
❤2
We are looking to hire a full-time Junior Marketing & Community profile to support daily marketing, community, and operational tasks. APPLY with your CV and a short note via [email protected] Details here 👉 Junior Marketing & Community Website | Twitter | Solid
🔥2🥴1
Fuse featured 🔎 > AI-enabled payments > Agentic commerce > Last-mile blockchain infrastructure The next chapter of Fuse is officially live 🟢 Website | Twitter | Solid
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @FuseAnnouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 69,180 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Fuse Announcements” (@FuseAnnouncements), 12,528 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/FuseAnnouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.