Channel
@kosacheva_mnenie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,055subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001425928573 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kosacheva_mnenie |
| Created | 24 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kosacheva_mnenie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 1,055 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:40 | 1,056 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 1,057 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 1,057 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (14 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,974 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
48 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ✍ | 13 | 27.1% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kosacheva_mnenie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЦИК РФ провел жеребьевку о порядке размещения политических партий в бюллетене на выборах в Госдуму 9 созыва Порядок такой: Единая Россия - 1 Яблоко - 2 ЛДПР - 3 Партия прямой демократии - 4 Зелёные - 5 Справедливая Россия - 6 Родина - 7 КПРФ - 8 Партия пенсионеров - 9 Коммунисты России - 10 Новые люди - 11
✍3
Рекомендация для чтения в выходной
Вместо предисловия Эта книга выросла из случайных встреч, старых дворов, разговоров на кухне, трамвайных маршрутов, дождя, кошек, ворон и людей, которые появляются в нашей жизни ненадолго, но почему-то остаются навсегда. Здесь Петербург не служит декорацией. Он живёт рядом с героями: скрипит лестницами, запотевает окнами, задерживает трамваи, подбрасывает странные совпадения и делает вид, что ничего особенного не п…
Электоральный рейтинг партий. 20 июля — 26 июля ВЦИОМ: 🐻 «Единая Россия» – 33,5% (+0,8 п.п.) 🟥 КПРФ – 9,7% (-2,2 п.п.) 🧴 «Новые люди» – 9,5% (-1,0 п.п) 🟦 ЛДПР – 8,0% (-1,6 п.п.) 🟨 СР – 6,0% (+0,6 п.п.) 👉 Подписаться на Пять партий
🙂 «Удмуртией будет руководить свой, глубоко укоренённый в местной ткани человек»: чем вызвано назначение Ольги Абрамовой врио губернатора? – эксперт КГ «Полилог», медиаменеджер и политолог Татьяна Косачёва ✔️Назначение Ольги Абрамовой врио губернатора Удмуртии — это случай, когда новый руководитель приходит в регион как свой, глубоко укоренённый в местной ткани человек. Она прошла путь от депутата местного совета до…
Татьяна Косачёва, замруководителя департамента политических проектов КГ «Полилог» — о досрочной отставке главы Удмуртии Александра Бречалова и назначении советника министра сельского хозяйства России Ольги Абрамовой на пост врио: За кадровой перестановкой в Удмуртии стоит несколько важных сигналов. На смену Александру Бречалову, который возглавлял регион с 2017 года, приходит Ольга Абрамова — человек, хорошо известн…
👍2
Ушедший в отставку экс-глава Удмуртии Александр Бречалов, который занимал должность почти 10 лет, может продолжить карьеру в «Сбере». Такое предложение поступило ему от руководства банка, сообщил «Ведомостям» источник в госструктурах. По словам другого собеседника, он «слышал», что главу Удмуртии позвали на такую работу. Третий уточняет, что сейчас появилось «окно возможностей», чтобы возглавить некий «проект» в стру…
👍2❤1
❗️Ольгу Абрамову назначили врио главы Удмуртии – указ подписал Путин. В 2024-м Абрамова стала советником главы Минсельхоза, до этого занимала пост и.о. председателя правительства Удмуртии. UPD: президент принял отставку Бречалова по собственному желанию. 🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
Итоги весенней сессии Совета Федерации подвели в Кремле На встрече с Валентиной Матвиенко Владимир Путин отметил возросшую роль верхней палаты в законодательной работе и обозначил главные направления, которые сегодня требуют особого внимания государства. В их числе — совершенствование системы поддержки участников СВО и их семей, а также меры, направленные на укрепление института семьи и улучшение демографической сит…
❤2
Коллеги из «Полилог. Экспертизы» выпустили третью часть исследования политических Telegram-каналов. Всего проанализировали 61 профиль. В обзор попал и мой, причем публикации изучили аж с конца 2018 года. В этой части коллеги показывают, как внутри каждого канала со временем менялась тематика публикаций и область интересов автора. На видео — разбор моего канала. Каждая точка обозначает отдельную публикацию. Цвет ука…
🔥4✍3👍2❤1
В Максе открыла комментарии и сделала канал публичным. Теперь интереснее туда будет что-то постить. А то как-то все очень лампово для 144 подписчиков 😂 Но они молодцы, держатся, не отписываются. И вы подпишитесь. В самом деле, ну 🥹😎
⚡3❤3💯3😁1😐1
Дума уходит, у правительства – новые возможности: чего ждать россиянам на следующей неделе? В целом вопросы "Что ждать", "Что будет", "Чем сердце успокоится" (с) самые актуальные. Хорошая идея обзора у Федералпресс. Вот, разобрали совместно тему финального пленарного заседания Госдумы 8-го созыва. Почитать можно по ссылке. Кстати, сейчас перед парламентариями выступает президент. Владимир Путин назвал нынешнее врем…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kosacheva_mnenie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 288,251 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 26 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@kosacheva_mnenie named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Косачёва_мнение” (@kosacheva_mnenie), 1,055 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kosacheva_mnenie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.