Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 63 days, net +3,262. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,956–18,313 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Oct 2026, 09:20
17,725
-12
3 Oct 2026, 23:14
17,737
-73
25 Sept 2026, 01:37
17,810
+2,740
17 Sept 2026, 07:38
15,070
+33
15 Sept 2026, 04:36
15,037
+53
13 Sept 2026, 13:58
14,984
+38
11 Sept 2026, 17:40
14,946
+47
9 Sept 2026, 01:58
14,899
+63
5 Sept 2026, 21:17
14,836
+27
3 Sept 2026, 18:22
14,809
+43
2 Sept 2026, 10:58
14,766
+39
1 Sept 2026, 11:25
14,727
+2
31 Aug 2026, 10:26
14,725
-5
30 Aug 2026, 07:08
14,730
-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:29
14,734
+3
28 Aug 2026, 10:17
14,731
+8
27 Aug 2026, 13:18
14,723
+5
26 Aug 2026, 14:08
14,718
+14
25 Aug 2026, 15:28
14,704
+10
24 Aug 2026, 18:07
14,694
first reading
Engagement
272 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 272 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
51m 41s
Average length
1m 07s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
11,497 reactions across 226 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
1,982
17.2%
🤡
1,978
17.2%
👍
1,394
12.1%
💩
1,142
9.93%
❤
1,082
9.41%
🔥
936
8.14%
👎
665
5.78%
🤮
631
5.49%
🤬
585
5.09%
🕊
172
1.50%
😢
172
1.50%
❤🔥
145
1.26%
😭
135
1.17%
🤔
114
0.992%
💯
113
0.983%
🙏
79
0.687%
🤷♂
74
0.644%
😱
73
0.635%
🦄
25
0.217%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 244 of the 272 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,582 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 244 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mosgorduma2024. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 272 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Концепция дебатов внезапно поменялась
Кандидат и действующий депутат ГД Михаил Матвеев, специально приехавший в Москву из Самары для участия на Первом канале, написал, что на телеке вчера внезапно сменили тему дебатов партий (миграционная политика).
После того как КПРФ сообщила, что представлять их партию на дебатах будет Матвеев, который на этом вопросе "собаку съел"
Напомним, что ранее его пытались снять с выбо…
#202округ
Ряды московских кандидатов- от "Яблока" продолжают пустеть
Сегодня с предвыборной гонки снимут их одномандатника по 202 Орехово-Борисовскому округу Сергея Пархоменко.
В 19.00 состоится заседании окружной избирательной комиссии, где первым пунктом в повестке значится рассмотрение вопроса об аннулировании регистрации кандидата от "Яблока"
___
До выборов - 17 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам нов…
Оговорочка по Фрейду
В прямом эфире на дебатах кандидатов в Госдуму руководитель ямальского отделения ЛДПР Денис Садовников не смог выговорить название своего региона и случайно выдал нецензурное выражение.
___
До выборов - 18 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам новость
А что с дебатами в Рязани на этой неделе?
На прошлой неделе несколько дней подряд все кандидаты в Госдуму на дебаты не пришли.
___
До выборов - 18 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам новость
#201округ
Кандидат от ЛДПР по 201 Новомосковскому округу Алексей Лапшов поддержал жителей
Коммунарки, которые выступают против планов строительства 7-этажного комплекса Light Industrial с производственными и торговыми помещениями, а также дарксторами практически в центре жилого района.
Под обращением против строительства, по данным заявителей собрано 2 820 подписей.
Начиная с марта 2025 года они обращаются в разл…
Уважаемые товарищи!
Прощание с Владимиром Ивановичем Лакеевым пройдёт завтра 3-го сентября (в четверг)
в 9-00
в Центре ритуального обслуживания (Савëловский проезд, д. 10, стр. 1)
Проезд до ст. м. "Савëловская" .
После прощания собравшиеся поедут в Заозëрье (Павлово-Посадский район), где состоятся похороны.
Кто имеет желание и такую возможность - оставить
пожертвование на похороны можно супруге Владимира Ивановича…
#198округ
Агитка с элементами арт-хауса и хоррора
Угарный ИИ оппозиционный ролик в стиле "Безнадега.точка.Ру" про проблемы районов ЮВАО, расположенных на территории 198 Люблинского одномандатного округа, появился в фан аккаунте тиктока про кандидата в ГД от НЛ Константина Минеева
Вначале на эмоциональных качелях зрителя раскачивают до полного беспросветного дна, но затем на них же - подкидывают до выхода из тонне…
#210округ
"Рыжак - за полный бак"
Кандидат от эсеров по 210 Солнцевскому одномандатному округу продолжает удивлять креативными листовками, таргетированными на автомобилистов.
___
До выборов - 18 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам новость
Ха, теперь Алиса рекомендует на основе нашего рейтинга поддержать по округам Москвы следующих кандидатов.
___
До выборов - 18 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам новость
#196округ
Вопрос дня: а вообще. нормально, что около школ политическая агитация ЕР?
___
До выборов - 19 суток
👉 Подписаться на канал
👉 Прислать нам новость
🤮55💩9👎6❤3👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 272 posts we hold for @mosgorduma2024. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mosgorduma2024 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой формат подкастов вам бы хотелось видеть в нашем канале ?
1. Больше лайва с живым общением ведущих и слушателей28%
2. Больше интервью с кандидатами и политиками56%
3. Проводите дебаты64%
4. Нужны новые рубрики и форматы16%
The shares total 164%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 272 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 57 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Дмитрий Гусев @gusev_tg · 20,236 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
ЕНГАЛЫЧЕВА Екатерина @deputatEkaterina · 44,560 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Сабина Цветкова @SabinaTsvetkova · 32,968 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
Пять партий @agendarussia · 34,590 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
Госдума 2026 @duma_2021 · 19,030 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 28 September 2026
РИТА ЭБЗЕЕВА @mosmosru · 104,094 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Горячева ДЕЛО говорит @DeputatGoryacheva · 67,426 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Восьмой созыв @rugosduma · 29,790 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
Выборы, выборы, выборы … @vybora · 41,949 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Депутат Ступин @evstupin · 49,732 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
ЦИК России @cikrossii · 29,447 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
ПОЛИТКУХНЯ @politica_kitchen · 20,997 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 October 2026
Пресс-служба Яблока @yabloko_press · 45,739 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Город по умолчанию @def_city · 22,429 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Городское хозяйство Москвы @kgh_moscow · 26,369 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Выборка @vyborka · 39,798 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 218,389 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Москва о важном @social_mos_news · 125,185 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
ЕРМосква @ermoscow · 41,758 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
RED BINDER @redbinder · 177,218 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
НЕЧАЕВ @nechaev_official · 37,187 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Юрий Долгорукий @yuradolgoruk · 72,750 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 4 September 2026
КУСАЧ @buzzerking · 180,486 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Выборный @vibornyk · 97,381 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 63 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
2024 Moscow City Duma election(en.wikipedia.org) “…[[Moscow City Duma]] member [[Mikhail Timonov]]{{cite web|url=https://t.me/mosgorduma2024/4966|title=Муниципальный депутат из района Богородское Георгий…” read 13 September 2026
Партия возрождения России(ru.wikipedia.org) “…Бутримова в 18 округе и Эрику Яблокову в 38 округе{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/mosgorduma2024/5160|title=МосГорДума 2024|website=Telegram|access-date=2…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МосГорДума 2024 /ГД 2026” (@mosgorduma2024), 17,725 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mosgorduma2024.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.