Алексей Нечаев. Председатель партии «Новые люди». Основатель Faberlic.
РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=674dac4d0acf9c1f42bb65a1®istryType=bloggersPermission
Created
15 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 48 comparable posts for this entry, running 27 July 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @nechaev_official — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far above this size band
162,000 average views per post against 37,045 subscribers — an engagement rate of 437.1%. Across the 8,315 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,997 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 20.8%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
12 of 12 published in the window (0 exact, 12 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,943,000
Mature posts only
449.1% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
63 measurements spanning 97 days, net +524. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,276–37,461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 10:49
37,003
-7
8 Nov 2026, 20:27
37,010
-19
7 Nov 2026, 14:06
37,029
-4
6 Nov 2026, 14:49
37,033
-3
5 Nov 2026, 17:26
37,036
-9
4 Nov 2026, 19:00
37,045
-11
2 Nov 2026, 17:09
37,056
-2
1 Nov 2026, 18:27
37,058
+2
31 Oct 2026, 15:56
37,056
+33
30 Oct 2026, 19:18
37,023
+98
29 Oct 2026, 20:17
36,925
-14
28 Oct 2026, 23:38
36,939
+9
27 Oct 2026, 23:08
36,930
-27
26 Oct 2026, 21:07
36,957
-19
26 Oct 2026, 00:27
36,976
-30
25 Oct 2026, 02:59
37,006
-11
24 Oct 2026, 00:26
37,017
-16
22 Oct 2026, 23:16
37,033
-10
21 Oct 2026, 22:44
37,043
-16
20 Oct 2026, 13:34
37,059
first reading
Engagement
49 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
404.1%
avg views ÷ 37,003 subscribers
Avg views / post
150,000
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.215%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 49 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
49 (27 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,644,710
Reactions total
3,533
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 15:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,350
Videos
≈137
Links
≈694
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 37s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,670 reactions across 48 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,831
38.7%
👍
5,724
32.4%
🔥
2,517
14.2%
👎
1,451
8.21%
🙏
513
2.90%
👏
250
1.41%
😡
133
0.753%
😁
112
0.634%
😢
73
0.413%
🤔
36
0.204%
😱
30
0.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,123 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
69
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 49 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nechaev_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.04%
1 of 49 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
106,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
138,000
over 48 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VfnxxX3wf2
1
17 September 2026
17 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Что будет, если завтра снизить ключевую ставку в два раза?
Кому-то кажется, что станет легче: бизнесу будет проще брать кредиты и развиваться, людям — покупать квартиры. Но на деле цены просто взлетят. Обсудили это в Госдуме на заседании с главой ЦБ Эльвирой Набиуллиной.
У нас уже был эксперимент — льготная ипотека. Хотели сделать жильё доступнее. А что в итоге? Дешёвые кредиты привели к росту цен. За три года ново…
Помощь одиноким мамам должна быть системной
Вчера был на встрече Центра помощи одиноким матерям. Его открыли в июне при поддержке партии. Юристы и психологи обработали больше 1300 обращений. За каждым из них — месяцы сложной и кропотливой работы. Спасибо команде за труд. Для мам эта помощь стала настоящей опорой.
Самые частые обращения — о неуплате алиментов. По многим кейсам есть результаты. Удалось добиться выпла…
С Днём народного единства!
Вчера «Новые люди» провели уже традиционную акцию «Россия — большая семья».
В нашей стране живёт почти 200 народов, которые говорят на ста языках. Сколько было попыток нас противопоставить и рассорить. Но каждый раз мы доказываем, что единство для нас важнее.
У нас общая судьба. И, работая вместе, мы строим сильную и развитую Россию, в которой есть место каждому народу и культуре.
🙋♂️ …
Наводим порядок на улицах: новые требования к курьерам
Минтранс поддержал нашу инициативу. Теперь курьерам нельзя будет ездить по тротуарам на электровелосипедах.
Мера давно назрела. За 2026 год в авариях с участием средств индивидуальной мобильности погиб 51 человек. Пострадало больше трёх с половиной тысяч. На 40% больше, чем в 2025 году.
Средняя зарплата курьера достигла 190 тысяч в месяц. При этом около 80% ку…
Российским компаниям разрешили хранить данные в дата-центрах дружественных стран
Мы предложили такую меру ещё в июле. И сегодня такой указ подписал Президент. Размещение данных в странах ОДКБ, например, в Белоруссии или Казахстане — вполне безопасное решение.
Для бизнеса это значит меньше рисков и убытков. А для людей — гарантия, что привычные сервисы будут работать без перебоев.
Предлагаем посмотреть, как будет р…
Вчера Госдума приняла в первом чтении бюджет на 2027 год
Он будет снова дефицитным. Но бесконечно повышать сборы и налоги нельзя. Нагрузка на людей и так огромная.
Владислав Даванков призвал коллег искать новые способы пополнения бюджета. И ещё ввести правило: каждый депутат, который вносит законопроект, должен объяснять, откуда взять деньги на его реализацию. Просто написать «понадобятся средства из бюджета» недос…
Перерасчёт за плохие коммунальные услуги должен быть автоматическим
Жители нескольких районов Москвы и Подмосковья жалуются, что вода из-под крана течёт еле тёплая. При этом платёжки рассчитываются по стандартным тарифам, как будто с качеством услуг всё в порядке.
В СМИ пишут, что в Балашихе жители одного дома несколько месяцев получают завышенные счета за подогрев, хотя горячей воды почти нет. Жилищная инспекция о…
Ксения Горячева становится моим советником по женской повестке
Манифест женщин России подписали 724 тысячи человек. Больше четырёх тысяч предложений мы получили с мая. За этими цифрами — доверие людей, которые ждут от нас законопроектов и конкретных решений.
Партия «Новые люди» занимается вопросами женщин не первый год. Мы собрали в Манифест то, о чём нам годами писали женщины: здоровье, безопасность, алименты, обр…
Безопасность дата-центров можно обеспечить без повышения цен для людей
Минцифры подготовило рекомендации, как защитить цифровую инфраструктуру от дронов. Компаниям нужно установить системы обнаружения угроз, создать запасные площадки и дубли важных сервисов. На выполнение этих мер нужны деньги.
По прогнозам, из-за новых расходов услуги провайдеров подорожают в среднем на 10%. То есть платить за безопасность дата-це…
Бюджету нужны новые доходы, а не только экономия
В новом бюджете заложено 48,7 трлн рублей расходов — почти столько же, сколько и на этот год. Траты почти не растут. А раз денег больше не становится — надо искать новые источники. У нас такие предложения есть. И Вице-премьер — Министр финансов Антон Силуанов их поддержал.
Одно из них — разобраться с недостроями. Это миллиарды рублей, которые не работают на людей и н…
Вячеслав Володин поддержал наш закон по «красивым» номерам
После выступления депутата от «Новых людей» Максима Гулина, спикер Госдумы призвал отдельно рассмотреть и проанализировать наши предложения.
На своем выступлении Максим показал госномер А888АА, который прямо сейчас продается за 26 млн рублей в интернете.
Доход с продажи этого номера пойдет в карман мутным посредникам. А мог бы пойти на ремонт школы в Челяб…
Бюджет должен работать на людей
В Госдуме подводим итоги бюджета-2025. Мы еще в 2024-м говорили: лишних денег нет. Каждый рубль должен решать конкретные проблемы людей или работать на будущее.
И в некоторых сферах такой подход уже сработал. Проект «Искусственный интеллект» исполнен почти полностью, на 7,25 млрд рублей. На беспилотные системы потратили 35,2 млрд, финансирование за год выросло на 11%. Центры поддержк…
👍143🔥48❤45👎2😁2😡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @nechaev_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nechaev_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 October 2026
Most recent edit
15 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 94 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 238 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Партия «Новые люди» @partynewpeople · 81,854 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
САРДАНА @RealSardana · 28,852 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
Пять партий @agendarussia · 34,824 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 3 September 2026
ДАВАНКОВ // Вице-спикер Госдумы @davankov · 211,905 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ГОРЯЧЕВА-МАХНИЦКАЯ @DeputatGoryacheva · 70,024 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Faberlic.Official.News @faberlic_official_news · 19,709 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 29 September 2026
Детский иммунитет @detskiy_immunitet · 26,692 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 11 September 2026
Faberlic Official @official_faberlic · 137,636 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 August 2026
Станислав Дружинин: правда о важном @svdruzhinin · 31,950 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕЧАЕВ” (@nechaev_official), 37,003 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nechaev_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
