Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лис Z Ворон

Channel

Лис Z Ворон

@foxandraven

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,257subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370630176
TypeChannel
Username@foxandraven
Created30 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/foxandraven

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@foxandraven/34606 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC@bumaznayaZmeya/807525 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC1.0072 seconds
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bumaznayaZmeya8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutesthis entry (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 204 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,2227,3727,2976 August 2026 — 7,299 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,299 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,299 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,284 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,275 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,277 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,276 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,289 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,287 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,291 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,368 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,372 subscribers25 September 2026 — 7,370 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,356 subscribers10 October 2026 — 7,370 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,222 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,233 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,246 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,245 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,241 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,243 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,251 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,240 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,248 subscribers11 November 2026 — 7,257 subscribers7,2576 August 202611 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 97 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,200–7,395 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:467,257+9
7 Nov 2026, 20:087,248+8
4 Nov 2026, 10:357,240-11
1 Nov 2026, 13:387,251+8
29 Oct 2026, 17:457,243+2
26 Oct 2026, 14:257,241-4
23 Oct 2026, 19:597,245-1
20 Oct 2026, 20:107,246+13
17 Oct 2026, 10:467,233+11
14 Oct 2026, 08:187,222-148
10 Oct 2026, 13:217,370+14
4 Oct 2026, 16:397,356-14
25 Sept 2026, 01:187,370-2
16 Sept 2026, 20:587,372+4
12 Sept 2026, 15:567,368+77
8 Sept 2026, 19:157,291+4
3 Sept 2026, 19:387,287-2
31 Aug 2026, 16:377,289+9
28 Aug 2026, 07:127,280+4
24 Aug 2026, 23:497,276first reading

Engagement

264 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.58%
avg views ÷ 7,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
623
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
105
of 264 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held264 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total64,792
Reactions total2,433
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
52m 22s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 62 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,076 reactions across 245 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,39923.0%
🔥1,26620.8%
💯80513.2%
🤬5779.50%
🙏3656.01%
😁3485.73%
👏2183.59%
🤣2083.42%
🤯1933.18%
❤1843.03%
❤‍🔥811.33%
🎉440.724%
😢380.625%
🫡360.592%
🤡350.576%
💩340.56%
💔270.444%
🤩250.411%
🤮250.411%
👀180.296%
19 further kinds1502.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 260 of the 264 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,512 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 264 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 25 of 105 posts held from the last 30 days (23.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:24 UTC284 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️Российская ПВО впервые сбила американские ракеты Rusty Dagger — Минобороны заявило об уничтожении четырёх боеприпасов. Не боятся переговорный фон испортить, ишь ты 🤣 @foxandraven

👍10⚡1❤1

10 Nov 2026, 16:19 UTC600 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️35-летняя гражданка Украины Ксения П. была схвачена польскими пограничниками на железнодорожном переходе с Украиной. Она находилась в розыске Интерпола с 2020 года за торговлю человеческими органами. В Казахстане ей присвоили 12 лет тюрьмы за продажу 56 человеческих почек. Reuters. @foxandraven

🤯25💯3🤡1

10 Nov 2026, 16:14 UTC419 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Единственный недостаток ударов по Киеву — недостаток ударов по Киеву.

💯26😁3💊1

10 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC544 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

⚡️Свет погас во время речи Санду о светлом будущем в ЕС 😂 @foxandraven

😁25🔥4

10 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC535 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️Напоминаю, у нас ещё есть группа ВК, на случай если нас всех тут скоро запретят 😂 https://vk.ru/foxandraven @foxandraven

👍6💩2

10 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC529 views54 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️МВД России инициировало принятие закона, по которому с 2027 года трудовые мигранты будут платить налог за каждого приехавшего в РФ члена семьи (c) Владимир Колокольцев, РИА @foxandraven

👍50💯2🤡2

10 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC549 views31 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

⚡️За три года российское гражданство было прекращено у 5 тыс бывших иностранцев — преимущественно из-за совершенных ими преступлений, сообщил министр внутренних дел Владимир Колокольцев. @foxandraven

👍28🤡3

10 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC685 views29 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

⚡️Хохлы строят насыпную переправу через Днепр ниже Запорожья. Сегодня ночью по ней прилетело 5 ФАБов 😃 @foxandraven

👍27🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC526 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥29💯3🤡2🤬2🤮2

9 Nov 2026, 16:42 UTC656 views53 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

⚡️Россия не согласится на замораживание конфликта, которое позволит сохранить существующие угрозы нашей безопасности и создаст условия для новой эскалации, — Небензя @foxandraven

👍53

9 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC658 views10 reactionsread 11 November 2026

⚡️Напоминаю, у нас ещё есть группа ВК, на случай если нас всех тут скоро запретят 😂 https://vk.ru/foxandraven @foxandraven

👍6💩3❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 264 posts we hold for @foxandraven. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@foxandraven edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

V🇷🇺Рука Кремля🇷🇺Z
@thehandofthekremlin · 21,662
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лис Z Ворон” (@foxandraven), 7,257 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/foxandraven.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.