❗️ Умер посол России в США Александр Дарчиев, ему было 67 лет, сообщили в пресс-службе МИД РФ. ▪Канал РБК в «Максе»
😢22🥱7👍4🎉2

Channel
@Svoidanash
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
25,584subscribers
+494 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001455634751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Svoidanash |
| Description | О чем шепчут Свои Нашим в коридорах власти. Шепчите нам сюда @Svoi_na_svyazi_bot |
| Created | 26 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Svoidanash |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Svoidanash/13451 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC | @neoreshkins/1558815 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC | 1.00 | 2.4 hours |
| @neoreshkins/1559116 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC | @Svoidanash/13456 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC | 1.00 | 3.5 hours |
| @neoreshkins/1562019 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC | @Svoidanash/13466 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC | 1.00 | 6 minutes |
| @neoreshkins/1565721 Oct 2026, 09:55 UTC | @Svoidanash/13474 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 10:12 UTC | 1.00 | 16 minutes |
| @russicaru/7057215 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC | @Svoidanash/13448 · this entry15 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC | 1.00 | 47 minutes |
| @Svoidanash/13466 · this entry19 Oct 2026, 08:56 UTC | @russicaru/7061319 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC | 1.00 | 5 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @neoreshkins | 27 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 1.9 hours | this entry (15–12) |
| @russicaru | 21 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2.3 hours | @russicaru (11–10) |
| @kremlebezBashennik | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 43 minutes | @kremlebezBashennik (4–2) |
| @bigtransfer2024 | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 74 minutes | this entry (6–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 11 of the 11 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 203 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:50 | 25,584 | +6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 25,578 | -5 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 05:57 | 25,583 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:18 | 25,588 | +1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 02:59 | 25,587 | +31 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:08 | 25,556 | +34 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 22:50 | 25,522 | +46 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 25,476 | +88 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:51 | 25,388 | +1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:26 | 25,387 | +14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 25,373 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:11 | 25,357 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 16:45 | 25,369 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 15:55 | 25,381 | -1 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:04 | 25,382 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:15 | 25,383 | -25 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 25,408 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:29 | 25,416 | +8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:04 | 25,408 | +33 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 25,375 | first reading |
234 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 142 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 186 of 187 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 234 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,555,660 |
| Reactions total | 4,937 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 21:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,196 reactions across 230 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 982 | 13.6% | |
| ❤ | 916 | 12.7% | |
| 💯 | 688 | 9.56% | |
| 🤡 | 673 | 9.35% | |
| 🤬 | 653 | 9.07% | |
| 🤣 | 603 | 8.38% | |
| 🔥 | 564 | 7.84% | |
| 👍 | 523 | 7.27% | |
| 🤔 | 279 | 3.88% | |
| 👏 | 278 | 3.86% | |
| 😢 | 163 | 2.27% | |
| 😱 | 116 | 1.61% | |
| 🤮 | 89 | 1.24% | |
| 🤯 | 73 | 1.01% | |
| 💩 | 60 | 0.834% | |
| 👎 | 53 | 0.737% | |
| 👀 | 48 | 0.667% | |
| 🙈 | 46 | 0.639% | |
| ❤🔥 | 44 | 0.611% | |
| 😡 | 34 | 0.472% | |
| 31 further kinds | 311 | 4.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 233 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Svoidanash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 234 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 187 posts held from the last 30 days (12.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️ Умер посол России в США Александр Дарчиев, ему было 67 лет, сообщили в пресс-службе МИД РФ. ▪Канал РБК в «Максе»
😢22🥱7👍4🎉2
27 километров, с которых началась железнодорожная индустриализация России 30 октября (11 ноября по новому стилю) 1837 года состоялось торжественное открытие Царскосельской железной дороги — первой в России железной дороги общего пользования с паровой тягой. В этот день из Петербурга в Царское Село отправился состав из восьми вагонов во главе с паровозом «Проворный», построенным в Англии на заводе Роберта Стефенсона…
🔥10❤4👍3
⚖Бывших топ-менеджеров «Роснано» приговорили к срокам от пяти до семи с половиной лет лишения свободы, сообщает ТАСС со ссылкой на адвоката Андрея Гривцова. Их обвинили в злоупотреблении полномочиями, которое привело к ущербу в 52 млрд рублей. ▶Решение вынес Гагаринский районный суд Москвы. Артура Галстяна приговорили к 7,5 года лишения свободы, Марину Касенкову – к 6,5 года, Бориса Подольского – к 5 годам. Суд так…
🤣11🤬3❤2👍2🤡1
🫶 ОМК заберет производство фотошаблонов Продолжаем приносить подробности о мегакорпорации чипов, которую формируют у нас в стране. 📢Согласно проекту стратегии развития «ОМК», в ее контур войдут: Московская испытательная лаборатория микроэлектроники и материалов (МИЛМ) и центр фотошаблонов (НТЦ ФШ). МИЛМ хотят интегрировать в ОМК уже в 2027 г. ⚗️Лаборатория должна заниматься испытаниями микросхем, аналитикой химич…
❤4🤡2🔥1😁1
Путин поручил сделать электроэнергию для российской промышленности дешевле китайской. Но есть одна проблема — кто за это заплатит? Владимир Путин поручил правительству обеспечить стоимость электроэнергии в России на 20% ниже, чем в Китае. Для отечественной промышленности это принципиальный вопрос: например, в себестоимости алюминия расходы на электроэнергию достигают 25–30%, а ферросплавов — 30–40%. Но российская э…
💯8🤡6❤1👍1
На крупнейшем российском производителе микроэлектроники — зеленоградском заводе «Микрон» — проходят массовые увольнения сотрудников. Как сообщает профсоюзный Telegram-канал «На равных», руководство предприятия вынуждает работников писать заявления по собственному желанию, чтобы не выплачивать компенсации при сокращении штата. По оценке сотрудника завода, увольнения уже затронули сотни человек. Давление на работников…
🤬19👍3❤2👀1😁1
Ту-214: 20 самолётов в год к 2029-му? Казанский авиационный завод имени С. П. Горбунова рассчитывает через три года выйти на выпуск 20 Ту-214 ежегодно. Об этом раис Татарстана Рустам Минниханов сообщил Владимиру Путину. По его словам, на предприятии уже перешли от стапельной сборки к поточным линиям. Минниханов также сообщил, что на заводе реконструировано 900 тыс. кв. м и построено 80 тыс. кв. м производственных пл…
😁12🦄3
Очередные пассы руками Богоспасаемого: министр Алиханов решил ещё глубже залезть в карман автовладельцев. Минпромторг подготовил проект постановления, объединяющий правила расчёта и уплаты утильсбора для автомобилей, грузовиков, автобусов, самоходной техники и прицепов. Документ заменит два действующих постановления — № 1291 и № 81. Предполагаемая дата вступления в силу — 1 мая 2027 года. Официально Минпром настаив…
🤬10❤5👏2
Суд приговорил бывшего министра по вопросам Открытого правительства Михаила Абызова к 14 годам лишения свободы по делу о мошенничестве с инвестициями Российской венчурной компании (РВК). Ему также назначен штраф в размере 80 млн рублей и предписано возместить ущерб на сумму более 353 млн рублей. Абызов вину не признаёт. Защита намерена обжаловать приговор. Это уже второе уголовное дело в отношении бывшего министра.…
😁8👍2
Основные заявления Кушнера и украинской стороны по результатам переговоров в Абу-Даби Джаред Кушнер: • Завтра вместе со Стивом Уиткоффом отправится в Москву на встречу с Владимиром Путиным. • США пытаются привлечь европейцев к участию в переговорном формате. • Обсуждались вопросы послевоенной безопасности. • Достигнут значительный прогресс по гарантиям безопасности для Украины. • Самым сложным вопросом остаётся сог…
🦄10🤡4❤1
Российская металлургия: октябрьский спад после сентябрьского отскока Российская чёрная металлургия в октябре вновь перешла к сокращению производства. По предварительным данным корпорации «Чермет», выплавка стали составила 5,2 млн тонн (−2% год к году), выпуск готового проката — 4,4 млн тонн (−4,7%). Производство чугуна снизилось на 3,5%, до 3,9 млн тонн. Единственное исключение — стальные трубы: рост на 7%, до 0,8 м…
⚡️Главные заявления Мединского по итогам переговоров России, США и Украины в Абу-Даби ⚪️Тема европейской системы безопасности была центральной на переговорах. ⚪️Конфликт на Украине показал, что система безопасности в Европе работает очень плохо. ⚪️Миру нужна справедливая система безопасности, не в ущерб каким-либо странам. ⚪️С участием США обменялись позициями. Где-то нашли взаимопонимание, где-то нет. Разговор б…
🤡6
Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @Svoidanash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 47 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Свои да Наши” (@Svoidanash), 25,584 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Svoidanash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.