Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
1.0 average views per post against 33,080 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.003%. Across the 3,699 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,625–99,947 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.72% and 11.0%, with a median of 5.08%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (27 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Posts measured
324 of 324 published in the window (324 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
324
Mature posts only
0.003% over 100 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 48 days, net -71. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,069–33,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 07:21
33,080
-16
18 Sept 2026, 19:41
33,096
-9
16 Sept 2026, 13:36
33,105
-5
14 Sept 2026, 15:58
33,110
-3
13 Sept 2026, 04:19
33,113
-5
11 Sept 2026, 04:16
33,118
-3
8 Sept 2026, 08:20
33,121
-2
5 Sept 2026, 02:17
33,123
-3
3 Sept 2026, 06:45
33,126
-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:15
33,130
-2
31 Aug 2026, 02:03
33,132
-2
29 Aug 2026, 23:04
33,134
-2
29 Aug 2026, 00:44
33,136
-2
27 Aug 2026, 00:42
33,138
-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:16
33,139
-1
22 Aug 2026, 05:46
33,140
-1
19 Aug 2026, 17:21
33,141
-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:47
33,142
-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:17
33,143
-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:56
33,145
first reading
Engagement
579 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 81 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.003%
avg views ÷ 33,080 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
324 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
324
of 579 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
579 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
324
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 19:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈909
Videos
≈210
Links
≈1,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 35m
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
0.345%
2 of 579 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1.0
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1.0
over 577 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 579 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
The Fed proposed new reserve and capital requirements for stablecoin issuers under the GENIUS Act
Governor Barr supported the move but emphasized the need for clearer rules on stablecoin redemption during periods of market stress.
🦘 Roobet – The #1 Crypto Casino & Sportsbook.
BULLISH: 🟠 Strive CEO Matt Cole says, "the release valve will be the dollar and Bitcoin will reclaim its role as the fastest horse versus gold and it will go to the moon."
"We are perpetual Bitcoin bulls because we think the U.S. government will not fix the debt crisis until something breaks."
"No Bitcoin price is too high because we think Bitcoin can effectively go to infinity versus the dollar."
Source: https://…
JUST IN: 🟠 $172 billion WisdomTree says Bitcoin "is working exactly as intended" 👀
"Bitcoin was built for economic uncertainty...it has traded through a war, an oil shock and a rate rise, and rallied 46% since July." 🚀
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2103542531892080716
JUST IN: 🟠 Strategy’s Michael Saylor just said, "Major U.S. banks could create $100 billion of bank credit on #Bitcoin within 12 months and buy 10 years’ worth of BTC supply."
"The BTC price would triple, and the industry would expand to $10 trillion."
"Bank adoption will be really important, and they will get their signals from the Treasury."
Source: https://x.com/BTCtreasuries/status/2103399353910255938
BULLISH: 🟠 Head of Blockware Intelligence says it's clear Bitcoin "is not going anywhere" and the cycles are changing.
"As the capital base grows larger and larger, the bear markets may become shallower." 🚀
Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2102422947960963377
Showing the 12 most recent of 579 posts we hold for @Soldi_fals1o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Soldi_fals1o edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
22 September 2026
Most recent edit
22 September 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SOLDI BANCONOTE” (@Soldi_fals1o), 33,080 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Soldi_fals1o.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
