Channel
@RavenSignalsPro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
79,381subscribers
-243 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001930642453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavenSignalsPro |
| Description | Base your moves on real data from former JP Morgan investors. 🔒 | VIP channels: 8-14 Trading Signals / Month, AutoBot, Market Updates) - www.ravensignalspro.com/services ✉️ Support: @RavenProSupport 📊 | Stats: https://t.me/ravensignalspro_stats |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavenSignalsPro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 79,381 | -64 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 79,445 | -44 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 79,489 | -47 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 79,536 | -59 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:23 | 79,595 | -27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 79,622 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:30 | 79,624 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 79,624 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 326,370 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
💬 RAVEN ANSWERS “Do I need to take every signal you send?” No. You are always in control of which setups you choose to follow. Inside Raven VIP, we provide the trade plan: ✅ Entry Zone ✅ Take Profit Targets ✅ Stop Loss ✅ Trade Direction From there, you decide whether the setup fits your own risk and trading plan. You don't need to chase every opportunity. Sometimes the best decision is simply to wait for the …
You have probably noticed something if you have been following Raven for a while... We usually show you the results AFTER they happen. But inside VIP, members receive the setup first. ✅ Entry Zone ✅ Take Profit Targets ✅ Stop Loss ✅ Structured Crypto + Forex setups Yesterday, CETUS/USDT reached +15.10% at TP2. Today, 2 more trades are already active. 👀 The question is: Will you be watching the next result from…
🔥 VIP WIN TO START THE WEEK Yesterday, Raven Crypto VIP started the week with another result. CETUS/USDT LONG 📈 ✅ Entry reached in 5 minutes ✅ TP1: +10.07% ✅ TP2: +15.10% And VIP members received the complete setup BEFORE the move: 🔹 Entry Zone 🔹 Take Profit Targets 🔹 Stop Loss 🔹 Clear Trade Direction The public channel sees the result. VIP sees the opportunity first. 👀 📊 Stats History: @ravensignalspro_stats
👀 LAST WEEK'S RESULTS ARE DONE. +333.10% Crypto +350 PIPS Forex Now those numbers go into the history books. Because this week starts from ZERO again. New setups. New entries. New targets. New opportunities. And this is the part that matters: Public members see what happened. VIP members receive the setups BEFORE we know how they'll end. That's the difference. Want to be inside for this week's setups? 📩 Que…
Photo, posted without a caption
One losing Forex day. One Crypto Stop Loss in the trade history. And both markets still finished the week strongly positive. That's why we show the FULL picture. Wins and losses. Good days and bad days. The numbers stay visible. 📊 Past results don't guarantee future performance.
🔥 RAVEN WEEKLY REPORT August 3–9, 2026 CRYPTO 📈 Monday: +53.46% Wednesday: +22.88% Thursday: +58.61% Friday: +113.61% 🔥 Saturday: +75.05% Sunday: +9.50% 💰 TOTAL: +333.10% FOREX 📊 Monday: -130 PIPS Tuesday: +160 PIPS Wednesday: +160 PIPS Thursday: +160 PIPS 💰 TOTAL: +350 PIPS
📊 MONDAY = RESULTS DAY Before we start another trading week, let's look at what happened inside Raven VIP last week. And it was a BIG week for Crypto. 👀 Crypto: +333.10% Forex: +350 PIPS But as always, we're not only showing you the wins. There were Stop Losses too. Full weekly breakdown coming next. 👇
👀 TOMORROW, WE START AGAIN. New week. New market. New setups. And as always, we'll continue showing you what happens inside Raven VIP, including the wins AND the losses. Tomorrow we'll publish our Weekly Report so you can see the numbers for yourself. 📊 No cherry-picking. No pretending every trade wins. Just another week of following the plan. Enjoy the rest of your Sunday. We'll see you when the markets get m…
📊 YOU TOLD US. WE'RE LISTENING. The final results from Friday's poll are in 👇 🥇 43% struggle with finding a good entry 🥈 34% struggle with knowing when to take profit 📊 9% managing emotions 📊 9% knowing how much to risk 📊 5% setting the right Stop Loss The biggest takeaway? 77% of you struggle with either ENTRY or TAKE PROFIT. And both should be decided before you enter a trade. That's why every Raven VIP setup…
#MMT/USDT All targets achieved 😎 Profit: 42.8443% 📈 Period: 2 hr 36 min ⏰
#SAGA/USDT All targets achieved 😎 Profit: 37.8127% 📈 Period: 1 hr 19 min ⏰
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @RavenSignalsPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What's hardest for you when trading?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛” (@RavenSignalsPro), 79,381 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavenSignalsPro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.