A trade can hit profit… and still reverse afterwards. That’s exactly what happened with VVV/USDT. ✅ TP2 reached: +23.81% Later, the remaining position reversed and eventually closed at Stop Loss. This is why Raven uses multiple Take-Profit levels. Markets don’t move in a straight line. Taking profit along the way gives traders options instead of relying on price reaching one final target. And yes, sometimes a…

Channel
RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛
@RavenSignalsPro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
48,166subscribers
-31,458 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001930642453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavenSignalsPro |
| Description | Base your moves on real data from former JP Morgan investors. 🔒 | VIP channels: 8-14 Trading Signals / Month, AutoBot, Market Updates) - www.ravensignalspro.com/services ✉️ Support: @RavenProSupport 📊 | Stats: https://t.me/ravensignalspro_stats |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavenSignalsPro |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 06:50 | 48,166 | -39 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 21:16 | 48,205 | -17 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 16:06 | 48,222 | -25 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 14:07 | 48,247 | -25 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:46 | 48,272 | -34 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:51 | 48,306 | -45 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:05 | 48,351 | -67 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 48,418 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:15 | 48,427 | -28 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 48,455 | -33 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 48,488 | -117 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 48,605 | -140 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 48,745 | -75 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 48,820 | -16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:09 | 48,836 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 48,846 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:48 | 48,866 | -157 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 17:57 | 49,023 | -452 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 49,475 | -379 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 15:36 | 49,854 | first reading |
Engagement
232 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.2%
- avg views ÷ 48,166 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 9,750
- 54 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 54
- of 232 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 232 (4 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 526,520 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,640
- Videos
- ≈81
- Links
- ≈943
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 35s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 54 posts held from the last 30 days (1.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Another weekly report is finished. But those opportunities are already behind us. Crypto: +156.38% Forex: +380 PIPS You can study last week’s results today. What you can’t do is go back and receive those setups before they moved. That’s what VIP access changes. When Raven finds the next opportunity, members receive the trade plan while the outcome is still unknown: 📍 Entry 🎯 Take-Profit Targets 🛑 Stop Loss ⚡ T…
One bad day doesn’t always decide the week. Forex proved that again. Midweek: 📉 Tuesday: -55 PIPS 📉 Wednesday: -130 PIPS Then: 📈 Thursday: +120 PIPS 🔥 Friday: +260 PIPS Final weekly result: +380 PIPS Crypto had the same reminder on Sunday. One Stop Loss came in… but the week still closed at +156.38% after results like: 🏆 BLESS +55.46% 🏆 FIL +47.64% 🏆 ARIA +43.73% This is why discipline matters. You don’t…
🔥 RAVEN VIP WEEKLY REPORT | NOV 2–8 November is off to a strong start. Both VIP markets finished the week in the green: 🪙 CRYPTO 📈 +156.38% 🎯 83.33% TP/SL Accuracy ✅ 5 Wins | ❌ 1 SL 💱 FOREX 📈 +380 PIPS 🎯 75% TP/SL Accuracy ✅ 6 Wins | ❌ 2 SL Not a perfect week. There were losing trades in both markets. But both still finished profitable overall. That’s the full picture we want you to see every Monday. 📊 Full …
If you’ve been following Raven for weeks, you probably already know whether VIP interests you. You’ve seen the results. You’ve seen the losses. You’ve seen how we trade through different market conditions. So if you’re ready to stop watching and see Raven from the inside: 🔥 ACCESS RAVEN VIP HERE 🌐 https://ravensignalspro.com/services/ Not sure which membership is right for you? 📩 @RavenProSupport Tell us CRYP…
What actually changes when you join Raven VIP? You stop seeing only the finished result. You start seeing the process before it becomes one. A new setup appears. You can review the entry. You can see the targets. You know the Stop Loss. Then you decide whether the trade fits your own risk. Some setups will win. Some won’t. But you’re finally seeing Raven from the side our public screenshots can’t fully show…
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥 Forex VIP is already moving today. GBPJPY SELL 213.20: ✅ TP1 +25 PIPS ✅ TP2 +50 PIPS ✅ TP3 +75 PIPS ✅ TP4 +100 PIPS And this comes after another recent GOLD setup reached +120 PIPS. The important part? Members received the setups before these became result screenshots. That’s the side of Raven you don’t fully experience from the public channel. 📊 More results: @ravensignalspro_stats
Sometimes one of the best messages Raven can send is: ❌ SETUP CANCELLED That might sound strange. After all, members join VIP to receive trades. But our job isn’t to keep everyone constantly in the market. If the setup changes before entry… if price moves without giving us the entry we planned… or if the opportunity is no longer worth taking… we would rather cancel it than force it. No trade is better than a…
Maybe the thing stopping you from joining isn’t the results anymore. Maybe you just want to know: “Will Raven actually be useful for the way I trade?” That’s something we can help you figure out before you pay. Tell us what you’re looking for: 🪙 CRYPTO 💱 FOREX 🔥 BOTH Or simply send us your question. 📩 @RavenProSupport No need to keep wondering from the public channel. Talk to us directly and decide whether R…
VIP shouldn’t be judged by: “How many signals did I get today?” Look at the bigger picture. Some setups may stop at TP1. Some may reach TP6. Some may hit Stop Loss. And sometimes the market simply doesn’t give us enough reason to enter. The value is having Raven there week after week, analysing and sharing the setups that meet our criteria. That’s why we publish weekly results instead of cherry-picking the bu…
📩 We get questions like this: > “What if I join VIP and there aren’t many signals that week?” Fair question. Raven doesn’t have a quota we need to fill. If the market gives us several setups we like, we can be active. If conditions are messy, there may be fewer. Because sending a trade just so members feel “busy” would defeat the point. You’re not paying us to manufacture action. You’re paying for access when…
Showing the 12 most recent of 232 posts we hold for @RavenSignalsPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
If you were considering VIP this week, what would matter most to you?
- More consistent Forex opportunities38%
- Stronger Crypto performance15%
- More proof over several weeks23%
- More help with risk & trade management15%
- A better membership offer31%
- I already want to join, I just have questions15%
The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
What would make you most likely to join Raven VIP?
- More consistent weekly results48%
- More Forex & Crypto wins like this15%
- Clearer explanation of how signals work4%
- Easier automation / less monitoring15%
- A better price / offer19%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
When you look at a trading signal, what makes you trust it most?
- Clear entry + TP + SL52%
- Consistent weekly results11%
- Seeing losing trades too26%
- Clear explanations11%
- Support when I have questions0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How would you follow Raven Crypto signals?
- Manually48%
- Auto Trading with Cornix32%
- One Click Follow with Cornix8%
- I’m still learning how it works20%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you joined Raven VIP today, what would you use it for most?
- Crypto signals64%
- Forex signals12%
- Both Crypto + Forex29%
- Saving time finding setups5%
- I’m still just watching12%
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When a good setup appears, what usually makes you miss it?
- I see it too late52%
- I don’t know where to enter5%
- I don’t know when to take profit19%
- I am busy and cannot monitor charts14%
- I hesitate too much10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 232 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ravensignalspro_stats · 710#1
@ExclusivePumps · 273,091#2
@binancekillers · 233,777#3
@TechCryptoAnalyst · 308,245#4
@FedRussianInsiders · 113,266#5
@BinanceKillersVipChannel · 45,262#6
@binance_futures · 24,634#7
@cryptosignals0rg · 44,232#8
@AlgoBotAnnouncements · 9,095#9
@FedRussianInsidersOfficial · 20,702#10
@binancemafia · 12,911#11
@cryptovirussignals · 1,838#12
@learn2tradectypto · 21,761#13
@hitpumpangels · 3,235#14
@wolfxsignals_stats · 5,163#15
@Master_of_binanace · 10,705#16
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 82,579#17
@AltSignal_VIP · 7,742#18
@Whalesguide · 183,177#19
@WolfxCrypto_VIP · 7,686#20
@lvxsignalsfree · 660 (as read 19 August 2026)#21
@Binance_360_spot · 8,334#22
@Always_Win_Premium · 17,264#23
@binance_360 · 100,885#24
@crypto_musk1 · 81,543#25
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 495,628#26
@crypto_pump_island · 21,300#27
@cryptoamanclubpremium · 24,971#28
@KingCryptoCalls · 294,374#29
@CryptoInfinitum · 14,508#30
@altsignals · 26,609#31
@aman_crypto_signals · 6,565#32
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 86,491#33
@megafutures · 10,624#34
@crypto_pumps_p · 189,067#35
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 148,491#36
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 83,629#37
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 195,160#38
@CryptoVIPsignalTA · 314,216#39
@whalepumpgroup23 · 16,032#40
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 48,682#41
@wolfoftrading · 119,761#42
@Trading_Signals8 · 154,463#43
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 67,493#44
@coincodecap · 25,185#45
@BitcoinBullets · 96,074#46
@Crypto_Insiders_Club · 7,696#47
@thecryptoexpress · 247,150#48
@BitcoinBullets_VipOfficial · 20,374#49
@WallstreetQueenOfficialViP · 23,806#50
@Pumps_Signals_Trading_Whales · 20,025#51
@mexcpumpcoins · 11,068#52
@Binance_Hotbit_Kucoin_Pumps · 11,391#53
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,584#54
@dexpumps · 42,032#55
@Crypto_Vip_Rose_Signals_Pumps · 17,288#56
@cryptopumps · 41,314#57
@pumpleaks · 19,999#58
@mexc_pumpsignal · 37,538#59
@crypto1_pump · 3,481#60
@Pancakeswappumpss · 34,299#61
@BinancePumpSignaIs · 20,590#62
@Kucoin_english_pump · 10,210#63
@cryptobull · 13,595#64
@wallstreetgems · 35,270#65
@bigpumpsbinance · 21,812#66
@crypto_pumps_events_signals · 5,367#67
@sharks_pump · 4,013#68
@Binance_Pro_orginal · 7,966#69
@cryptoclubspump · 563#70
@BeSomebodyFX · 6,020#71
@Therichtrader_Reborn · 24,339#72
@pumpreview · 910#73
@rhinopumps · 21,442#74
@cryptotalkpump · 1,013#75
@wolfxcryptopromos · 1,130#76
@Binance_Pumps_Signals_Crypto_vip · 24,916#77
@FedRussianInsiders_Vip · 17,452#78
@snakesignal · 33,913#79
@Cryptoy · 34,119#80
@kucoin_crypto_pumps_trading · 26,827#81
@cryptocompass360 · 826#82
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wallstreet_queenofficial · 86,491
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 18 August 2026
@ExclusivePumps · 273,091
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@fatpigsignals · 41,174
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 29 August 2026
@crypto_pump_island · 21,300
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 495,628
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@cryptopumps · 41,314
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 82,579
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 195,160
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,584
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@wallstreetgems · 35,270
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptosignals0rg · 44,232
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_p · 189,067
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Pumps_Signals_Trading_Whales · 20,025
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
@pumps20 · 58,502
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
@bigpumpsbinance · 21,812
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@pumpleaks · 19,999
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@DeFimillion · 219,009
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
@Pancakeswappumpss · 34,299
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@crypto_pumps_binance · 75,530
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 48,682
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 67,493
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 83,629
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@coincodecap · 25,185
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026
@dadpumps · 25,450
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛” (@RavenSignalsPro), 48,166 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavenSignalsPro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.