Channel
@RavenSignalsPro
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
77,703subscribers
-1,921 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001930642453 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RavenSignalsPro |
| Description | Base your moves on real data from former JP Morgan investors. 🔒 | VIP channels: 8-14 Trading Signals / Month, AutoBot, Market Updates) - www.ravensignalspro.com/services ✉️ Support: @RavenProSupport 📊 | Stats: https://t.me/ravensignalspro_stats |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RavenSignalsPro |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 77,703 | -159 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:59 | 77,862 | -87 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 77,949 | -37 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 77,986 | -58 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:39 | 78,044 | -40 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 78,084 | -107 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 78,191 | -133 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:42 | 78,324 | -65 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:05 | 78,389 | -44 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:48 | 78,433 | -86 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 78,519 | -57 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 78,576 | -48 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 78,624 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 78,645 | -28 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 78,673 | -9 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 78,682 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 78,716 | -43 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 78,759 | -51 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 78,810 | -62 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 78,872 | first reading |
148 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 675,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Ever missed a trade… then entered late because you didn’t want to miss the profit? That is one of the easiest ways to turn FOMO into a bad entry. If the planned entry is gone, the trade has changed. Different price. Different risk. Different reward. Missing one setup is frustrating. Chasing it can be worse. 📩 Want to learn how Raven entry zones work? @RavenProSupport
You could be missing another trade right now. Not because there are no opportunities. Because you are still waiting. XPL/USDT already moved +35.58% today. That setup is done. The next one could come anytime. How many more moves do you want to watch after they happen? 🌐 Join Raven VIP: https://ravensignalspro.com/services/ 📩 @RavenProSupport
Why do VIP members like setups like this? Because it is not just “buy now” and hope for the best. For XPL/USDT, members received: • the entry zone • multiple take-profit levels • the stop-loss • a clear direction: LONG LONG means we expect the price to go up. The entry zone gives members a range to enter, not just one random price. The multiple TP levels give flexibility based on your own risk style. That is wh…
Why do we use an Entry Zone instead of one exact price? Because the market does not always touch one perfect number. For AVNT/USDT, the Entry Zone was: 0.1110 – 0.1080 That gives traders a range where the setup is still considered valid. It also helps avoid chasing price if the market has already moved too far. Entry Zone = flexibility. But still with a clear plan. 📊 Want to see more real Raven setups? @raven…
❓What does “LONG” actually mean? AVNT/USDT was shared as a LONG setup. In simple terms: LONG = we expect the price to move UP from the entry area. So the plan is: ✅ Enter around the Entry Zone ✅ Take profit as price moves higher ✅ Use the Stop Loss if the trade goes the wrong way Simple idea. But the important part is having the levels planned before entering. 📩 Still learning how our signals work? @RavenProS…
Still interested in Raven… but haven’t joined? Then tell us what is actually stopping you. Not enough proof? Confused about the signals? Unsure which membership fits you? Concerned about risk? Need help getting started? You do not have to figure it out alone. 📩 Message @RavenProSupport and ask us directly. If Raven fits what you need, we’ll show you how to get started. 🌐 https://ravensignalspro.com/services/
“What if I’m too busy when a Crypto setup arrives?” That is a real problem for traders with work, business or family. You may find a good trade... but see it too late. That is why Raven Crypto supports Cornix automation. It can help manage: ✅ Entries ✅ Take Profit levels ✅ Stop Loss So you do not need to stare at Telegram all day just to follow a setup. 📩 Want help understanding Cornix? @RavenProSupport
if you’ve been waiting for “the right time” to join Raven… maybe waiting for another day's results means missing everything that happens before then. 🌐 Get Raven VIP access: https://ravensignalspro.com/services/ 📩 Still deciding? @RavenProSupport
Video, posted without a caption
❓“Which Take Profit should I actually use?” This is where many traders overthink. Raven gives multiple TP levels because you do NOT have to hold every trade to the final target. Some members secure profit earlier. Many prefer around TP2–TP3. Others leave part of the position running. The goal is not to catch the absolute top. It is to have an exit plan before greed takes over. 📩 Still unsure how our TP system w…
It’s only Tuesday… and Raven VIP is already moving. 👀 The week has barely started. And this is already on the board. 📩 Want to know what’s happening inside Forex VIP? @RavenProSupport
❓If you were in this GOLD trade, where would you have closed? TP1: +40 PIPS TP2: +80 PIPS TP3: +120 PIPS TP4: +160 PIPS 🔥 There is no prize for holding the longest. Some traders secure profit early. Some scale out. Some let part of the position run. The important part is having your exit plan BEFORE emotion takes over. 📩 Not sure how our TP system works? Ask us: @RavenProSupport
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @RavenSignalsPro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
When you look at a trading signal, what makes you trust it most?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How would you follow Raven Crypto signals?
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
If you joined Raven VIP today, what would you use it for most?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
When a good setup appears, what usually makes you miss it?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What's stopping you from joining Raven VIP?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What's hardest for you when trading?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RAVEN Signals Pro - Crypto Forex 🐦⬛” (@RavenSignalsPro), 77,703 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RavenSignalsPro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.