Channel

CryptoVirus 🦠

@cryptovirussignals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,924subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001413179415
Type	Channel
Username	@cryptovirussignals
Created	Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	13 August 2026
Measurements held	5
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/cryptovirussignals

Growth

5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,923–1,932 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:34	1,924	-4
10 Aug 2026, 17:11	1,928	-1
7 Aug 2026, 20:15	1,929	-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:15	1,931	no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:07	1,931	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	20	27.0%
🔥	16	21.6%
❤	15	20.3%
🤔	6	8.11%
😱	4	5.41%
😁	3	4.05%
🤣	3	4.05%
🤯	3	4.05%
😭	2	2.70%
🤝	1	1.35%
🤬	1	1.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 September 2025 to 13 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Mar 2026, 07:22 UTC≈1,160 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

A $50 Million Fat-Finger Mistake A crypto trader swapped 50,400,000 USDT for just $36,000 while trying to buy AAVE through their interface. He ended up with only 324 AAVE, worth $36,000. Despite a warning, he confirmed the transaction with 99% slippage. In the end, the block builder Titan captured $34 million in profit, while the Aave team is now trying to reach the trader to at least return the $600,000 in fees 😂

❤4🤬1