$maiga tp 0.0085 Tp2 0.012

Channel
Crypto Hidden Gems Finder
@cryptotalkpump
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,094subscribers
-80 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002032846885 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptotalkpump |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptotalkpump |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 1,094 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 1,098 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 1,105 | -14 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 08:42 | 1,119 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:43 | 1,137 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 1,157 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 1,164 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 1,167 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 1,170 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,172 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 1,174 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 1,174 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
$h 20% Dyor
$BANK is sitting at a critical area now. 👀 Current price: ~$0.048 🟢 Major support: $0.044 If $0.044 holds, upside levels I'm watching: 🎯 $0.054 🎯 $0.063 There’s also heavy liquidity stacked above these levels. Lose $0.044 → weakness continues. Hold $0.044 → bounce setup becomes interesting. #BANK #Crypto #Trading
$h tp 0.138
Buy $h Huge risk huge profit
$beat hit 6.2 today Congratulations🥳🎉
$beat 50%
Loading pump soon
Buy here
$beat in top on binance alpha More is coming Don't sell cheap
❤️❤️✨💥💥💥$pyr
Sell scond targer now
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptotalkpump. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@crypto_pump_island · 116,577
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@F_crypto_pumps_l · 214,570
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Signal_Binance · 793,049
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@Pumps_Signals_Trading_Whales · 20,603
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 September 2026
@Kucoin_Binance_Pumps · 85,928
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
@rhinopumps · 22,349
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 20 September 2026
@Crypto_Popup_Signals · 71,585
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Global · 26,948
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 10 September 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 555,934
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@Free_Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Vip · 161,034
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Whales_Signals · 51,940
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 August 2026
@Crypto_Pump_Exclusive_Signals · 127,263
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
@crypto_pumps_p · 197,330
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
@Crypto_Pumps_Signals_Big · 21,226
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 24 September 2026
@Pancakeswappumpss · 35,786
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,659
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
@KucoinPumpChannel · 43,031
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@pumpleaks · 20,832
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 September 2026
@wallstreetgems · 36,688
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
@cryptopumps · 42,365
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
@bigpumpsbinance · 22,610
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 September 2026
@RavenSignalsPro · 77,703
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Hidden Gems Finder” (@cryptotalkpump), 1,094 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptotalkpump.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.