Still holding GBPCHF. Nothing changed here. I'm expecting all this chop to resolve to the upside. Target still 1.12
Signed Jay Rally

Channel
@BeSomebodyFX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,020subscribers
+584 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263737468 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BeSomebodyFX |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BeSomebodyFX |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:20 | 6,020 | +22 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:34 | 5,998 | +5 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 5,993 | +6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 5,987 | +18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 5,969 | +22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 11:27 | 5,947 | +11 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 10:48 | 5,936 | +29 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 5,907 | +11 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 5,896 | +10 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:00 | 5,886 | +30 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 14:56 | 5,856 | +38 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 5,818 | +73 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:00 | 5,745 | +31 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 5,714 | +34 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 5,680 | +34 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 5,646 | +33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 5,613 | +36 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 5,577 | +16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 5,561 | +29 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 5,532 | first reading |
34 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (15 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 29,499 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 02:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Still holding GBPCHF. Nothing changed here. I'm expecting all this chop to resolve to the upside. Target still 1.12
Signed Jay Rally
The weekend that created the Forex market: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdg7W5PYsek A different kind of video today while we wait for the US midterm election on Tuesday, a bit of history knowledge is always useful!
Signed Jay Rally
New lows approaching on GOLD. Still the same view. "Cheap" is NOT a reason to buy yet.
Signed Jay Rally
GBPCHF, still there. UK budget to be announced tomorrow. Once that clears without any surprises, it should start breaking higher.
Signed Jay Rally
Positive surprise here for Europe. Base case scenario was a downgrade in the rating but they didn't! For Monday it should mean some relief in the French bonds stress and less safe haven demand for the CHF. In plain words, will help lift GBPCHF higher too. Have a great weekend everybody!
Signed Jay Rally
The same force that pushed GOLD from 5400 down to 4000 is still there and getting stronger. As long as the context doesn’t change, we are NOT buying the dip in GOLD yet. If you prefer to watch the video on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQZD_akXnG0 7 minutes to be on the right side of the context!
Signed Jay Rally
Still NOT buying GOLD yet. "Cheap" is NOT a reason to buy! We'll get long the precious metal ONLY when the context shifts bullish for it. For now... Higher energy prices = higher rates = bearish GOLD
Signed Jay Rally
We are long GBPCHF. 1. Unemployment rate dropped to 4.7% (from 4.9%) 2. Wages (ex bonuses) accelerated to 3.7% (from 3.5%) 3. Services CPI jumped to 3.7% (from 3.4%) Simply, all hawkish for the Bank of England which will have to hike at their next meeting and keep more hikes on the table as well. Target 1.12
Signed Jay Rally
The Dollar fell after a hot CPI and everyone’s calling the top. Ehhh I wouldn’t be so sure about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfs34uK2rxY Don’t fight the FED!
Signed Jay Rally
We took the small profit on AUDCHF after the labor market data from Australia. As bad as it gets there with the unemployment rate up to a 5 year high! That puts a dent in the RBA's outlook, no more hikes anytime soon.
Signed Jay Rally
If you've watched the latest video, you know exactly the strategy behind it.
Signed Jay Rally
AUDCHF
Signed Jay Rally
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @BeSomebodyFX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BeSomebodyFX” (@BeSomebodyFX), 6,020 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BeSomebodyFX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.