Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AltSignals.io 🥷👑

@altsignals

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,737subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354862145
TypeChannel
Username@altsignals
DescriptionFounded 2017 ✅ World Class Signals Official channel for AltSignals. Beware of other channels, others often impersonate. Site: altsignals.io Join: altsignals.io/join Results: altsignals.io/results Verify Real Through @altsignalssupportofficial
Created7 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/altsignals

Growth

27,73727,84927,7936 August 2026 — 27,849 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,849 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,833 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,817 subscribers9 August 2026 — 27,804 subscribers10 August 2026 — 27,795 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,776 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,761 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,737 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,720–27,866 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:4527,737-24
11 Aug 2026, 22:1127,761-15
11 Aug 2026, 01:1127,776-19
10 Aug 2026, 01:4227,795-9
9 Aug 2026, 02:5127,804-13
8 Aug 2026, 02:0827,817-16
7 Aug 2026, 02:4327,833-16
6 Aug 2026, 06:4527,849no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:3927,849first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.09%
avg views ÷ 27,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
579
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held39 (22 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total22,591
Reactions total65
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 21:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,250
Videos
78
Links
2,440

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

37 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2362.2%
👍1437.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 14:42 UTC132 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

We’ll decide by the most reactions. Feel free to react, the choice is yours.

3

12 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC194 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#BREAKING: 🇺🇸 US CPI came in at 3.4%, Expectations: 3.4% Lowest level in 4 months.

2

12 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC285 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 Solana Price Analysis: Institutional Investment and Innovation Fuel Growth Despite Market Volatility Solana demonstrates strong resilience amid crypto market volatility, maintaining key support levels around 73.5 to 74 dollars and attracting significant institutional inflows. Continued ecosystem growth, rising stablecoin activity, and technical upgrades are fueling optimism for further price gains.

1

11 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC307 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 Rocket Lab Sees Record Q2 Revenue, Growing Backlog, and Expansion into Space and Government Deals Full Article: https://altsignals.io/post/rocket-lab-q2-growth-backlog-outlook Summarised Video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0kEAYbtuO3Y

11 Aug 2026, 02:26 UTC321 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 Ondo Finance: Technical Analysis, Key Partnerships, and Future in DeFi & Tokenized Assets Ondo Finance ONDO is gaining increased attention in the digital finance space, with its price consolidating near key support and resistance levels and a growing market cap of 1.68 billion. This article explores ONDO's recent partnerships, such as the integration with RoqquPay to expand tokenized stocks to milli

1

10 Aug 2026, 18:25 UTC330 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 SharpLink Q2 Revenue Surges, But Net Loss Hits Record High on Ethereum Swings, Expansion Costs Full Article: https://altsignals.io/post/sharplink-q2-loss-ethereum-growth Summarised Video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/KBBmnht4dys

10 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC379 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 Dogecoin Price Rises as Whale Buying Fuels Momentum Near Resistance and Fed Uncertainty Dogecoin’s price momentum is shifting as whale accumulation increases, signaling potential trend reversals. This analysis explores key resistance and support levels, technical insights, and the impact of macroeconomic factors on DOGE’s near-term outlook. Stay informed on whale movements, pivotal price thresholds,

9 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC378 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 Earnings, Inflation Data to Fuel Market Swings as Tech and AI Giants Announce Results Full Article: https://altsignals.io/post/key-earnings-economic-data-week Summarised Video: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/GF6nGonb5gQ

9 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC431 viewsread 12 August 2026

🚨 Latest News 🚨 China’s Gold Hoarding Shifts Global Reserves and Accelerates De-Dollarization Efforts China is accelerating its global gold strategy, expanding reserves to 2,366 tonnes with 21 straight months of purchases in a move to diversify away from the US dollar and boost economic resilience. Explore China’s motives, Hong Kong’s emerging role in gold trading, and the global impact of China’s growing influence

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @altsignals. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,783 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DeFi Million
@DeFimillion · 402,919
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 10 August 2026
Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,738
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 315,444
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AltSignals.io 🥷👑” (@altsignals), 27,737 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/altsignals.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.