Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Binance Mafia

@binancemafia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,848subscribers

-98 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001231014026
TypeChannel
Username@binancemafia
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/binancemafia

Growth

13,84813,94613,8977 August 2026 — 13,946 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,946 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,944 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,932 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,925 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,908 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,890 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,848 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -98. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,833–13,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5413,848-15
11 Aug 2026, 21:1413,863-27
11 Aug 2026, 00:3813,890-18
10 Aug 2026, 00:2913,908-17
9 Aug 2026, 00:5313,925-7
8 Aug 2026, 00:0113,932-12
7 Aug 2026, 03:0413,944-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:4513,946no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:3513,946first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 13,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,990
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
23
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held23 (16 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total68,750
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔥 UPDATED SIGNAL: #4USDT TP1: 0.0107 +11.65% ✅ TP2: 0.0109 +17.48% ✅ TP3: 0.0111 +23.30% ✅ TP4: 0.0115 +34.95% ✅ TP5: 0.0120 +49.51% ✅ TP6: 0.0130 +78.64% ✅

9 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC≈2,600 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin is experiencing its longest capitulation phase since the FTX collapse in 2022, according to Glassnode. Heavy selling and investor losses suggest the market is going through a major de-risking period. Historically, extended capitulation can eventually create the conditions for a stronger recovery, but confirmation of a bottom is still needed.

8 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈2,660 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥 Event: 100% Deposit Cashback,up to $11,000!8 tasks,all Stacked!Tradfi For Win 15USDT Daily! ⏰ Event time: 2026-07-30 00:00 to 2026-08-31 23:59 (UTC+8) 🌏 Event eligibility: both new and old users are welcome Event Highlights: 100% Deposit Cashback: Earn Position Vouchers equal to your deposit amount, up to $11,000 Daily $15 Bonus: Complete any Gold, Silver, Crude Oil, or Crypto trade daily to unlock $15 Position

26 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥LONGING #4USDT🔥 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Exchanges: Binance Futures $4USDT has seen the highest volume breakout of any coin on Binance, getting ready for an easy 2-3x short term ENTRY: Below 0.0103 TARGETS: 0.0107 – 0.0109 – 0.0111 - 0.0115 - 0.0120 - 0.013 - 0.014 - 0.017 - 0.023 - 0.028 - OPEN SL: Below 0.0083 https://www.binance.com/en/futures/4USDT

21 Jul 2026, 18:52 UTC≈3,080 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥#CHILLGUY (Binance Futures)🔥 Same setup as $BANK before it went parabolic. Leverage: 3-5x Entry: Below 0.011 Targets: 0.0112 - 0.0114 - 0.0117 - 0.0121 - 0.0128 - 0.0135 - 0.0146 - 0.0160 - 0.018 - 0.021 - 0.024 - 0.030 - 0.038 - 0.045 - 0.060 - 0.081 - OPEN SL: Below 0.0077

19 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Key Levels for SOL • Resistance: $76.00 (POC / prior structure), then $83.68 → $85.21 (weekly level) • Support: $73.63 (daily level / range POC) held on this test • Below that: $64.00 zone as the deeper range low if support fails

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @binancemafia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTCAnonymous Poll34 voters

Do you like our signals ?

  1. Yes we love it 😍82%
  2. New here18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Wallstreet Queen Official®
@wallstreetqueenofficial · 200,738
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
Binance Killers®
@binancekillers · 315,444
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
Crypto Pump Signals Bitcoin
@Crypto_Pump_Money_Daytrade · 601,640
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
Crypto Pump Club 📈
@crypto_pumps_p · 202,578
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Binance Mafia” (@binancemafia), 13,848 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/binancemafia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.