Channel
@pumpreview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
971subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001231172246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pumpreview |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pumpreview |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:11 | 971 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 971 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Bro fr, you changed my fkn life with this channel. I’ve been in crypto for a while but never seen calls this accurate. That last pump? In and out with 2.5x like it’s nothing. No bullshit, no hype – just clean moves and solid entries. Respect for keeping it real. Staying here for good 🔥🙏
thanks, great signals, love you
Thank you so much brother
Another amazing pump!
Photo, posted without a caption
This one was insane bro, best one so far thanks
Ok then thank you bro ... You're Awesome 😎💯
Another great run, thank you!
This is incredible! You have helped me turn $150 into $67k in 5 days. My annual salary is $72k... 🤯
That was a great one! Thanks!
Another fantastic run! Thanks!
It was great, really, peace be upon you. You control the Karbpet market.
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pumpreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 164,132 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pump Reviews” (@pumpreview), 971 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pumpreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.