Read Rare — архив из документов и книг: внутренние записки, утекшие руководства и забытые материалы от создателей Apple, Intel, Google, Facebook и др. Чтение — бесплатно. Полезно для проведения исследований и работы с первоисточниками. 📎 ссылка на ресурс 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Беларусь

Channel
OSINT Беларусь
@osintby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,561subscribers
+547 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001163864941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osintby |
| Description | Обратная связь: E-mail: [email protected] Admin: @admOSINTBY |
| Created | 19 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osintby |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:07 | 8,561 | -8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 10:08 | 8,569 | +4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:32 | 8,565 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:55 | 8,574 | +18 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 8,556 | +48 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:56 | 8,508 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 8,507 | +6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:06 | 8,501 | +10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:51 | 8,491 | +8 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 8,483 | +2 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 8,481 | +36 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 8,445 | +45 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:56 | 8,400 | +49 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 8,351 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 8,350 | +8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:42 | 8,342 | +131 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 8,211 | +80 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 8,131 | +15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 8,116 | +56 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 8,060 | first reading |
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.6%
- avg views ÷ 8,561 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 996
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 14
- of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 53 (25 June 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 13,950 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 00:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈963
- Videos
- ≈137
- Links
- ≈1,550
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 48s
- Average length
- 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Общаемся, обсуждаем, делимся знаниями в чате канала "OSINT Беларусь"
Global Surface Water Explorer — интерактивная карта, которая позволяет заглянуть в прошлое и отследить изменения любых поверхностных вод планеты (рек, озер, водохранилищ, болот). 📎 ссылка на ресурс 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Беларусь
Map of Life — сервис, который позволяет визуализировать распространение различных видов животных и растений по всему миру, используя краудсорсинговые данные и профессиональные реестры как маркеры экологического состояния территорий. 📎 ссылка на ресурс 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Беларусь
Общаемся, обсуждаем, делимся знаниями в чате канала "OSINT Беларусь"
SIGID Wiki — открытая энциклопедия для идентификации радиосигналов. В базе собраны описания сигналов и примеры аудио, которые помогают сравнить перехват с известными типами передачи. Поиск доступен по диапазонам и категориям, в т.ч. спутниковая связь, авиация, военные и цифровые протоколы. Ресурс особенно полезен при первичном анализе радиоэфира. 📎 ссылка на ресурс 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Беларусь
5 громких событий в кибербезопасности за последние время: 1. PHP2Shell — 9,2/10. Две критические уязвимости PHP позволяют удаленно выполнять код без авторизации. 2. Взлом VMmanager 6. Атака затронула инфраструктуру хостинг-провайдеров РФ. Под угрозой оказались пароли, токены, SSH-ключи и файлы клиентов. 3. Удары по российским дата-центрам. Повреждены объекты «Яндекса», Сбера и VK, вызвав сбои облачных сервисов, банк…
Telegram OSINT от UK OSINT — тематический раздел с материалами и инструментами для исследования публично доступной информации в Telegram. В нем собраны статьи о поиске аккаунтов, определении ID пользователя, веб-поиске по Telegram и Python-инструментах для анализа открытых данных. Полезен как стартовая подборка для работы с публичными каналами, группами и профилями. 📎 ссылка на раздел 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Бел…
Общаемся, обсуждаем, делимся знаниями в чате канала "OSINT Беларусь"
OSINT Checklist Generator — бесплатный онлайн-инструмент от ShadowDragon для создания чек-листов расследования. Нужно выбрать объект исследования — человека, компанию или локацию — и добавить исходный контекст. Сервис генерирует структурированный план поиска с направлениями для дальнейших проверок. Полезен как отправная точка при подготовке OSINT-исследования. Результаты следует адаптировать под задачу и проверять …
World Watch — интерактивная карта для глобального мониторинга в реальном времени. Объединяет данные об авиации, судоходстве, военной и критической инфраструктуре, ЧС, погоде, интернете, экономике и новостях. Полезна для первичного ситуационного анализа и сопоставления событий на одной карте. ⚠️ Информацию необходимо проверять по первичным источникам. 📎 ссылка на ресурс 👉 Подписывайтесь на OSINT Беларусь
Общаемся, обсуждаем, делимся знаниями в чате канала "OSINT Беларусь"
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @osintby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@cpb_msk · 2022 postsIntelligence Resources
@intelligenceresources · 4772 postsByDeanon
@bydeanon · 5601 postИнформационная безопасность
@cyberif · 3,4921 postХранители
@guardians_belarus · 2381 postPython в Telegram
@itpython · 171 postЛегальный разведчик - OSINT и AI
@osint_ai · 2431 postSchwarz
@Schwarz_0sint · 6301 postSbX | Security by Xyurity
@xyuriti · 1,2271 postЗеленый Луг Паблик-канал
@ZeLugMinsk · 451 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@social_graph_channel_ru · 24,458
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 September 2026
@Pulsechanel · 20,004
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 September 2026
@mycroftintel · 20,691
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
@osint_mindset_eng · 20,704
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 September 2026
@forensictools · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,184
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
@cybdetective · 28,012
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
@Russian_OSINT · 48,514
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
@osint_mindset · 64,889
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
@irozysk · 45,728
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
@tele_scan · 100,614
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 21 August 2026
@KladovkaPavlu · 64,668
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026
@lab_hack · 25,423
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026
@elliot_cybersec · 38,923
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
@cyberyozh_official · 62,555
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
@deedcoin_club · 23,008
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
@open_source_friend · 52,669
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@ProProfiIing · 23,151
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OSINT Беларусь” (@osintby), 8,561 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osintby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.