Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 189 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -775. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,465–33,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 15:40
32,581
-22
9 Nov 2026, 00:40
32,603
-11
7 Nov 2026, 20:41
32,614
-1
6 Nov 2026, 20:46
32,615
-2
5 Nov 2026, 21:50
32,617
-4
4 Nov 2026, 22:27
32,621
+3
3 Nov 2026, 22:21
32,618
-3
2 Nov 2026, 19:16
32,621
-7
1 Nov 2026, 22:06
32,628
-5
31 Oct 2026, 20:26
32,633
-2
30 Oct 2026, 16:59
32,635
-21
29 Oct 2026, 14:00
32,656
-3
28 Oct 2026, 13:05
32,659
-10
27 Oct 2026, 13:40
32,669
-4
26 Oct 2026, 15:28
32,673
-7
25 Oct 2026, 16:36
32,680
-5
24 Oct 2026, 19:48
32,685
-7
23 Oct 2026, 22:17
32,692
-6
22 Oct 2026, 19:30
32,698
-11
21 Oct 2026, 17:17
32,709
first reading
Engagement
367 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 172 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.3%
avg views ÷ 32,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,270
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 367 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
367 (1 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
989,030
Reactions total
42,401
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 08:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈15,200
Videos
≈2,080
Links
≈554
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
18m 51s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
125,179 reactions across 367 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
29,550
23.6%
❤
28,067
22.4%
💔
15,590
12.5%
👍
13,627
10.9%
🔥
9,699
7.75%
🤯
6,980
5.58%
👎
5,488
4.38%
😐
3,606
2.88%
😈
3,408
2.72%
🍓
1,711
1.37%
🤬
1,435
1.15%
🌚
1,382
1.10%
😭
1,281
1.02%
🫡
1,210
0.967%
😇
591
0.472%
💋
434
0.347%
😘
421
0.336%
👀
323
0.258%
🦄
86
0.069%
🙉
78
0.062%
4 further kinds
212
0.169%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 367 of the 367 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 125,179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 367 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 367 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @popthings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 367 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 136 posts held from the last 30 days (12.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
دیدی بعضی از فیلم ها میخندونت ولی وقتی به خودت میای میبینی چقدر داستانش تلخ و ناراحت کنندس؟
این فیلم ها از اوناس:
Dr. Strangelove (1964)
Fargo (1996)
In Bruges (2008)
The Big Lebowski (1998)
Birdman (2014)
After Hours (1985)
Arsenic and Old Lace (1944)
Snatch (2000)
Trainspotting (1996)
@popthings
سلام شبتون بخیر باشه
اگر vpn رایگان استفاده میکنید که هیچی اما اگر میخرید، میتونید از ایشون تهیه کنید
@marlashinger
من از زمان جنگ از وایرگاردشون برای اپلود ویدیوهای حجیم پیج هام و از ویتوری برای وبگردی روی لپتاپ استفاده میکنم.
کیفیتشون بینظیره.
شاید براتون جالب باشه بدونید که اگه بیش از ۲۴ تا گیاه کنار هم باشن دیگه فتوسنتز اتفاق نمیفته،
چون هر ۲۴ تصویر یک فریم هست و اونجوری میشه فیلمسنتز.
✍🏻nikolaportal
@popthings
دنیل ردکلیف : احتمالاً سریال هری پاتر را نمیبینم.
۸ ساعت برای هر چیزی زیاده!
پ.ن: مدت زمان لازم برای دیدن فیلم های هری پاتر ۱۹ ساعت و ۳۹ دقیقهس.
@popthings
گیم آو ترونز اومد و رفت،
هری پاتر اومد و رفت،
اودیسه هم اومد و رفت،
دون هم چند وقت دیگه میاد و میره...
هربار که یه اثر فانتزی یا حماسی میاد من فقط بیشتر مطمئن میشم ارباب حلقه ها چقدر دست نیافتنیه.
✍🏻 khashayar
@popthings
شوک بزرگ
جیمز گان از مدیریت استودیو DC کنار میره!
فقط چهار سال بعد از آغاز مدیریت جیمز گان و پیتر سفران بر استودیو DC، قراره هر دو از سمت خودشون کنار برن و مدیر سابق مارول جاشون رو بگیره.
البته این پایان همکاری جیمز گان با دنیای DC نیست! اون و سفران همچنان در تولید برخی پروژهها حضور دارن و ساخت دنبالهی سوپرمن هم ادامه داره.
بنظرتون رفتن جیمز گان به نفع دی سیه؟
@popthings
بازیگر نقش مادر چندلر بینگ در سریال Friends به انلیفنز پیوست.
مورگان فیرچایلد برخلاف تصور رایج درباره این شبکه، قصد انتشار محتوای جنسی یا برهنه نداره و میخواد عکسها، ویدئوها، لحظات روزمره، شوخیها و علایق شخصی خود را با طرفدارانش به اشتراک بگذاره و ازش پول دربیاره.
پ.ن: تو سریال هم مادر نرمالی نبود:/
@popthings
اودیسه رو دیدم...
فکر کنم مردی این داستانها رو سرهم کرده بود که زنش نفهمه چند سال پیش شارلیز ترون بوده.
ناکس چه خوب هم بافته: آره خانمم نمیدونی چی شد، یه اژدهای ۶سر شبیه خواهرت بهمون حمله کرد، افرادم خوک شدن پریدم نجاتشون دادم و...
خانم پاشو یه چایی بریز بیار تا بقیهش رو تعریف کنم.
✍🏻Blonde_bald
@popthings
😁163❤3😈3👎2🌚1👍1
Signed Aqasjd isback
Showing the 12 most recent of 367 posts we hold for @popthings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @popthings as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
17 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
17 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
27 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Chosefilm @Chosefilm · 80,292 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 24 August 2026
HIGH MOVIES @high_moviess · 52,553 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 August 2026
Cinema Freak @cinemaafreak · 217,155 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
مووی کاتیج @CottageOrg · 744,032 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
🎥 CinemaFact 📺 @MyCinemaFact2 · 274,911 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
AnimotionArt | انیموشن آرت @animotionart · 491,398 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 August 2026
هتریک | Hattric @Hattric_Official · 137,932 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
Marvel Verse | مارول ورس | Spider-Man Brand New Day | DoomsDay | مرد عنکبوتی | SpiderMan @MarvelVerse · 31,222 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
Cinema Tweet @cinema_twittt · 29,470 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
MovieTwitte | مووی توییت @MovieTwitte · 45,404 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
سینما توییتر @OfficialCinemaTwitter · 21,513 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 23 September 2026
Blue Moon @bluemoon · 34,249 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 2 September 2026
شوتیفای | اخبار فوتبال @Shootify · 84,287 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
Broken🚬boy @Brokenboy313 · 23,549 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 18 September 2026
باجه فیلم | BajeFilm @bajefilm · 19,963 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 September 2026
ویدلش | weedlashya @weedlashya · 209,848 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Funy Shots | فانی شات @FunyShots · 66,203 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 30 August 2026
Persiana Media Group @Persianatv · 76,180 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 August 2026
تغییر رتبه کنکور(تضمینی)-صندلی پزشکی @taghirrotbee · 1,283,948 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 3 September 2026
جرکینگ توییت @Jerking_twitt · 50,703 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
Fotballbad @FotballBad_Tv · 132,775 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 25 September 2026
MUSIC STAR @musicstar2 · 135,770 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
گیموشن آرت | GamotionArt @gamotionart · 104,587 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Popthings” (@popthings), 32,581 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/popthings.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.