На Чернігівщині шакали ТЦКуни витягли з дому та викрали чоловіка. На жаль, наш козак не був готовий захистити своє життя від нападу людоловів ТЦКунів... TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤬630😈87❤52😢50😭16🤣12👍6🕊4

Channel
@panchakvolodymyr
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
42,230subscribers
-454 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001547781058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @panchakvolodymyr |
| Description | Паньчак Володимир |
| Created | 11 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/panchakvolodymyr |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 42,230 | -164 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 42,394 | -118 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 01:59 | 42,512 | -90 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 42,602 | -121 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 42,723 | -146 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 42,869 | -165 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 43,034 | -130 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 43,164 | -92 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 43,256 | -55 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:43 | 43,311 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 43,353 | -50 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 43,403 | -90 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 43,493 | -65 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 43,558 | -83 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 43,641 | -68 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 11:26 | 43,709 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 43,712 | +144 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 43,568 | +71 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 43,497 | +31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 43,466 | first reading |
85 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 85 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 51 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,666 reactions across 85 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 8,610 | 41.7% | |
| 👍 | 1,706 | 8.26% | |
| ❤ | 1,465 | 7.09% | |
| 🤣 | 1,338 | 6.47% | |
| 🔥 | 1,183 | 5.72% | |
| 💯 | 1,094 | 5.29% | |
| 😢 | 1,054 | 5.10% | |
| 😁 | 840 | 4.06% | |
| 😈 | 804 | 3.89% | |
| 😡 | 671 | 3.25% | |
| 👏 | 440 | 2.13% | |
| 🙏 | 282 | 1.36% | |
| 👎 | 214 | 1.04% | |
| 🤪 | 199 | 0.963% | |
| 🤯 | 190 | 0.919% | |
| 😭 | 134 | 0.648% | |
| 🕊 | 93 | 0.45% | |
| 😱 | 89 | 0.431% | |
| 🙈 | 58 | 0.281% | |
| 🙉 | 49 | 0.237% | |
| 17 further kinds | 153 | 0.74% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 85 of the 85 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,666 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На Чернігівщині шакали ТЦКуни витягли з дому та викрали чоловіка. На жаль, наш козак не був готовий захистити своє життя від нападу людоловів ТЦКунів... TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤬630😈87❤52😢50😭16🤣12👍6🕊4
В Одесі зграя шакалів ТЦКунів намагаються викрасти одну людину для утилізації... TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
😡318🤬61😈41❤15😢12🤯8😁4🕊2
Громадянина Латвії побили людолови ТЦКуни на Авраменко, м. Кривий-Ріг. Потерпілий розповідає, що на нього напали, хоча він показував паспорт іншої країни. Хлопець боїться викликати швидку допомогу, так як вважає що його передадуть до Тцкунів. TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤬386🤣49😢37❤21👍11🤯7👎4🔥3
Новий випадок смерті мобілізованого на Україні: у Житомирській області помер Андрій Стесюк — чоловік з інвалідністю, який важив близько 200 кг і постійно приймав ліки. Крім того у чоловіка були ментальні проблеми За словами матері, він вийшов в магазин Без телефону і документів, після чого співробітники ТЦК силою посадили його в автобус. Свідка, яка намагалася попередити про стан його здоров'я, Слухати не стали. Ст…
🤬391😢94🙏24❤22😡8😈4🕊1😁1
Борис Джонсон заперечує, що зірвав мирні переговори України та РФ навесні 2022 року. Екс-прем'єр Британії каже, що українці самі хотіли продовжувати воювати, оскільки мали успіхи на полі бою і вже вибили РФ з Київської області. "Це повна, повна нісенітниця. Не було жодного Європейського чи західного лідера, який міг би зупинити українців від боротьби за свою країну. Все, що я сказав тоді Зеленському: «якщо ви хочет…
🤣229🤬159😈49❤21🤯11👍6🔥5👎4
Ветерана ЗСУ відлупцювали та принизили ТЦКуни, а потім ще і знайомі просили його не записувати звернень, бо ж "вороги використають"... TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤬332🤯63😢30😁14❤13👍11🤣11👏3
Колишні подільники Зєльця: Наумов-втік, Шурма-втік, Шефір-втік. Міндіч-втік. Цукерман-втік, Пушкар-втік, Котін-втік, Дмитрук-втік, Холодов-втік, Куницький-втік, Одаренко-втік, Комарницький-втік, Ведмідь-втік, Миронюк-втік. Кордон на замку тільки для холопів... З цих ніхто не провів жодного дня реального терміну. Ніхто не був покараний. Спокійно живуть всі на курортах і витрачають награбовані мільярди. Зараз вже но…
💯317🤬119👍28❤22😁13🤣4🔥1
Затримано 4 шакала з ТЦКунів в Одеській області, причетних до тортур і насильства над чоловіками. Таким чином, загальна кількість підозрюваних у цьому провадженні вже зросла до 13 осіб. Дев'ять з них були викриті ще в червні, троє з яких це представники ГО, які допомагали розшукувати людей і збирали інформацію про них. Постраждалих незаконно утримували, били, залякували і психологічно тиснули на них. TELEGRAM | FA…
👏157👍90🤣22❤18🔥12😡6🍾2
"Чоловіки, які не служили в армії, не мають морального права брати участь у політичному житті країни і працювати в державному апараті", — політолог Тарас Загородний. TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤣338🤬64😈58👍35👎13🤪11❤10🥴6
У Хмельницькому людолови ТЦКуни викрали людину TELEGRAM | FACEBOOK | RUTUBE | BASTYON | VIBER | INSTAGRAM | YOUTUBE
🤬177😈34😢10👍5❤4😁4🕊1
24 162 учасників взяли участь в опитуванні, люди я це роблю для аналітики каналу, щоб зрозуміти з яких соціальних мереж ви потрапляєте на канал, хто ще не дав відповідь зробіть свій вибір?! Дякую !
🔥35👍8❤4😈2
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍30❤7🔥5🦄2😈2🤔1🥱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 85 posts we hold for @panchakvolodymyr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@panchakvolodymyr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Шановні козаки і козачки запитання - як ви потрапили на цей Телеграм канал ?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 85 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Паньчак Володимир” (@panchakvolodymyr), 42,230 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panchakvolodymyr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.