Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПолітБавовна

Channel

ПолітБавовна

@politbavovna

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,362subscribers

+889 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001547689199
TypeChannel
Username@politbavovna
DescriptionКанал про політику і політиків 👤 Ексклюзив із штабів партій і кулуарів парламенту Посилання для приєднання https://t.me/+hqQP1idEuJg1ZGMy Контакт - [email protected] Онлайн-зв'язок: https://t.me/politbavovna?direct
Created15 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/politbavovna

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,39915,36214,880.56 August 2026 — 14,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,467 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,463 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,456 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,445 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,440 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,422 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,413 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,406 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,407 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,432 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,427 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,424 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,419 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,403 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,399 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,519 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,513 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,506 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,491 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,488 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,479 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,476 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,468 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,457 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,453 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,491 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,474 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,456 subscribers14 September 2026 — 14,445 subscribers16 September 2026 — 14,441 subscribers18 September 2026 — 14,426 subscribers1 October 2026 — 14,634 subscribers6 October 2026 — 14,655 subscribers10 October 2026 — 14,599 subscribers14 October 2026 — 14,659 subscribers15 October 2026 — 14,902 subscribers16 October 2026 — 14,969 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,110 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,097 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,082 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,084 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,062 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,041 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,031 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,022 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,017 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,003 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,002 subscribers28 October 2026 — 14,988 subscribers29 October 2026 — 14,972 subscribers30 October 2026 — 14,963 subscribers31 October 2026 — 14,954 subscribers1 November 2026 — 14,942 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,084 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,286 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,263 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,244 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,362 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 93 days, net +889. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,255–15,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:5615,362+118
5 Nov 2026, 19:2915,244-19
4 Nov 2026, 17:0515,263-23
3 Nov 2026, 16:3715,286+202
2 Nov 2026, 17:4015,084+142
1 Nov 2026, 17:2014,942-12
31 Oct 2026, 14:4414,954-9
30 Oct 2026, 15:1714,963-9
29 Oct 2026, 16:5114,972-16
28 Oct 2026, 17:5614,988-14
27 Oct 2026, 19:2115,002-1
26 Oct 2026, 19:2915,003-14
25 Oct 2026, 19:4715,017-5
24 Oct 2026, 17:0115,022-9
23 Oct 2026, 17:0115,031-10
22 Oct 2026, 15:3615,041-21
21 Oct 2026, 08:1915,062-22
20 Oct 2026, 05:3915,084+2
19 Oct 2026, 06:4615,082-15
18 Oct 2026, 06:2715,097first reading

Engagement

287 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
23.8%
avg views ÷ 15,362 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,660
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.16%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 287 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held287 (4 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total303,980
Reactions total12,632
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,160
Videos
≈1,450
Links
≈10,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 42m
Average length
3m 14s

Measured directly from 50 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

41,378 reactions across 274 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9,83323.8%
👍8,63220.9%
😁7,05117.0%
💯3,8319.26%
😡3,1967.72%
🤣1,7464.22%
😢1,5673.79%
🔥1,1292.73%
🙏1,0182.46%
🤔6441.56%
🙈6401.55%
🤯5851.41%
👏3810.921%
🤪3310.8%
😱1610.389%
👀1530.37%
🙉1510.365%
🙊1090.263%
👻430.104%
🗿410.099%
12 further kinds1360.329%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 286 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42,819 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 25 of 83 posts held from the last 30 days (30.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 15:27 UTC730 views104 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_officialVideo

Найбільше уражень російських окупантів забезпечує саме «Альфа». І насправді дуже хотілося б тільки таких результатів і від усіх інших складових Служби безпеки. На жаль, цей тиждень приніс зовсім інші новини про СБУ – відверто неприємно, відверто ганебно, абсолютно неприпустимі речі. І були вже через це звільнення в Службі безпеки України, і будуть ще інші кадрові рішення. Важливо, щоб розслідування дало повну правду…

❤92😁6🤔4🤣2

7 Nov 2026, 13:21 UTC≈1,420 views71 reactionsread 7 November 2026

🙈 Друзі, ну от де ви відкопали Гордона з його "планом". Це дослівно те ж саме, що напередодні розганяли від Павлюченка і що ми вчора коментували і спростовували на ПолітБавовні. Ну який нах Гордон ? який "путін готовий" ? P.S. Хтось підписав Діму-пірамідку на ПолітБавовну. Ну ок, нехай користується 😉

👍46💯17😁8

7 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC≈1,450 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026

⚡️ Давід Арахамія не очікує прориву від першого раунду переговорів між Україною, США та росією які пройдуть 10-11 листопада у Абу-Дабі, але сподівається на результати другого - про це він заявив у коментарі DW. "Була велика пауза в переговорному процесі. Саме відновлення тристоронніх переговорів уже є досягненням. Домогтися цього було непросто. Стів Віткофф виконав велику роботу, щоб просунути цей процес", - Араха…

👍42😁8💯7🤔5❤1😡1

7 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,520 views124 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_officialPhoto

Коли відбуваються зустрічі на рівні переговорних груп – тристоронні, двосторонні, не має значення – різні сторони заявляють, що потрібен час для підготовки до припинення вогню. Вони говорять, що складно здійснювати моніторинг, що необхідно відвести озброєння, а Україна має створити буферну зону. Припинення вогню в Олешках показало: ні. Це не обов’язково. Зараз війна технологічно інша. Можна вести моніторинг за допом…

❤83💯29👍6😁4🙏2

7 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,320 views114 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_official

Ми боремося за свободу і гинемо за свободу. Слова дуже важливі. Слова зі Сполучених Штатів, найбільшого захисника свободи, важливі. Підтримка важлива. Якщо будуть сильні слова проти Путіна та його агресії, якщо буде сильний пакет підтримки для України, Путін двічі, тричі, десять разів подумає, чи хоче він атакувати, чи, можливо, йому вже досить цієї війни. Я завжди намагався донести цю думку до Президента Америки, з…

👍89❤21😁4

7 Nov 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,270 views113 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_officialPhoto

Ідея обговорення європейсько-російської інфраструктури безпеки непроста і може бути небезпечною. Я був дуже чітким з усіма партнерами: спочатку ми маємо обговорити, як закінчити війну Росії проти України. По-друге, якою буде інфраструктура безпеки для України. Які гарантії безпеки отримає Україна. І вже потім, залежно від цих відповідей, сторони зможуть обговорювати інфраструктуру безпеки між Європою – або Євросоюзом…

👍96❤13😁4

7 Nov 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,440 views109 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_officialPhoto

До тристоронніх перемовин Росія готується, запускаючи балістику по українській критичній інфраструктурі. Де дозволяє безпекова ситуація, тривають ремонтні та рятувальні роботи у постраждалих регіонах. Комбінована була атака, загалом росіяни застосували 172 дрони і 36 балістичних ракет, і всі ракети – по Києву та області. Головна мішень удару – знову енергетика. У столиці складна ситуація з постачанням електрики, води…

😢65🙏35❤6👍2👏1

6 Nov 2026, 19:09 UTC≈2,160 views193 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @v_zelenskiy_officialVideo

Ми зараз маємо інформацію від розвідки, що готується новий удар – по енергетиці, по наших мостах через Дніпро, по цивільній інфраструктурі. Повітряні Сили та Збройні Сили України загалом готуються до захисту. Це непросто. Потрібні перехоплювачі для «петріотів», кожна домовленість – важлива, кожен день в постачанні – дуже важливий. І дуже просимо партнерів не відкладати постачання на потім. Будь ласка, бережіть себе…

😢88🙏71❤14🤣7🤪5😡4👍2😁1

6 Nov 2026, 18:00 UTC≈2,840 views166 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

😂 🔜 Завтра на усіх екранах столиці ... ПІДПИСАТИСЬ 📥

😁131🔥15👏7🤪6🙉3❤2🤣2

6 Nov 2026, 17:44 UTC≈2,140 views203 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @insiderukrPhoto

⚡️Украина продолжит наносить удары по российским НПЗ в ответ на атаки по своей энергетике. Следующие ответные действия уже определены, — Президент Зеленский 🇺🇦INSIDER UA | Прислать контент

❤142👍42🔥13👏2😡2🤪1🤯1

6 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,610 views138 reactionsread 7 November 2026

⚡️ Дякую усім нашим партнерам з NB8. Обговорили з партнерами підготовку до тристоронньої зустрічі в Абу-Дабі, - Президент України В.Зеленський Цими днями було багато підготовчих кроків: зустріч у Брюсселі за участю НАТО та європейців, мої контакти з представниками Президента Америки, фактично постійно переговорні команди на звʼязку. Вважаємо, що треба зробити зустріч в Еміратах результативною, і наші пропозиції щодо…

🙏82❤42🤪6👍2😁2🙈2😡1🙉1

6 Nov 2026, 16:30 UTC≈3,720 views134 reactionsread 7 November 2026

⚡️ Керівник Офісу Кирило Буданов очолить українську делегацію на переговорах в Абу-Дабі — CBS News. Кирило Буданов підтвердив це у інтерв'ю телекомпанії. З його слів, прориву на переговорах він не очікує, але вважає прогресом те, що сторони зустрінуться віч-на-віч вперше за кілька місяців. Upd. Буданов спростував інформацію про те, що він очолить українську делегацію в Абу-Дабі. Він уточнив, що буде присутній на …

👍88❤25🤪6😁6🤯3😡2🙈2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @politbavovna. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@politbavovna edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
7 November 2026
Most recent edit
7 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @politbavovna as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Absolution Leaks 🇪🇺
@absolutionleaks · 154,449
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Записки пасквілянта
@volodymyrboyko · 19,503
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Голубцы с Банковой
@golubtsybankova · 22,198
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 September 2026
Аналітика Куща
@Analityka_Kush · 48,429
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
➕Ігор Мосійчук 🦏
@mosiychuk72 · 487,741
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Миха Анархист Чаплыга
@MihaChaplyha · 100,529
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
Only News World/UA
@relikt_news · 20,272
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
Harley Quinn
@harley_with_love · 30,453
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Середич.info
@seredych · 33,198
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Карточный Офис
@office_ua · 98,697
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
Криоген
@krioggen · 19,027
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 September 2026
ПРАВДА ДМИТРИЯ СПИВАКА
@pravda_DS · 128,207
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 September 2026
Макс Бужанский
@MaxBuzhanskiy · 25,548
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
наглый
@maksnazar · 24,871
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
ШЕЛЕСТ
@shelestlive · 139,494
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
НАЗК
@NAZK_gov_ua · 24,453
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Бондаренко: Былое и Думы
@kost1969 · 84,498
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПолітБавовна” (@politbavovna), 15,362 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/politbavovna.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.