Channel
@aewarminds
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,130subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001657694667 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aewarminds |
| Created | 18 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aewarminds |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,130 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 2,136 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 2,134 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 2,134 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
46 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 45.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 13.0% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 13.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 May 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aewarminds. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 May 2026 to 8 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The Russian originator of the periodic table: ‘Mendeleev’ died under mysterious circumstances along with two of his lab assistants around 1907-1909 and just one year after the entire zero channel had been removed from his periodic table including the Aether. Aether was originally known as the ‘Quintessence’ meaning the purest, most concentrated essence. In medieval times it was considered to be the connection to spir…
💯6👏3👀1
Delphine (@stemiteracy) [10:42] · 66.5K views · May 22, 2026 · 6.6K likes · 624 comments · mp4 540p [38 MB] Posted 22 May 2026 - Discussing the book WIRELESS by PJ Risdon, 1923. Not available on Internet Archives but I have scanned it and sharing it on my website. If you know how to upload to Internet Archives, please help by uploading it for everyone. Book discusses the ether theoru vs Einstein's theory, and offer…
❤6👍2🙏2
Jason Fervento (@foundconscious) [0:36] · 632 views · Jun 1, 2026 · 56 likes · 2 comments · mp4 540p [3.9 MB] Nature got us boy!!🍉🍋🫚 saved by @InstantMediaBot
❤4
Perfect, so dystopian (@foundconscious) [1:59] · 3.9K views · Jun 5, 2026 · 450 likes · 17 comments · mp4 540p [7.1 MB] Georges Lakhovsky. 📖 The Secret of Life saved by @InstantMediaBot
❤4👎1
Jasper Reed (@danakippel) [3:00] · 27.3K views · Jun 2, 2026 · 3.5K likes · 265 comments · mp4 720p [24 MB] Seal of Solomon, Plasma, & Your Soul Magic 🦭“If it is really possible to derive from the four elements the higher fifth element, which is really the element of life itself, the great healing power, then the true art of transformation would have been discovered” - link in bio for plasma book & magic classes #a…
❤2
Stacey and Sage (@weareallenergy11) [3:00] · 98.6K views · Jun 5, 2026 · 5.1K likes · 251 comments · mp4 540p [15 MB] Is Apple monitoring your brain? Or is this just another conspiracy theory 🤨 saved by @InstantMediaBot
🤔1
What alcohol does to your body. Join us: t.me/CRUEL_HISTORY 🜂
❤1🤪1
This is GREAT ONE ✨ About our HEART 💚 Very well put together video, Must Watch… t.me/DavideB144
Emily (@20camels_emily) [1:32] · 356.1K views · Apr 17, 2026 · 48.2K likes · 532 comments · mp4 540p [7.5 MB] Would you try this Chinese Hospital?? 🤔🇨🇳 #china #中国 #chongqing #medicaltourism #hospital 📍 Location: Zhenggang Traditional Chinese Orthopedics Hospital (Chongqing, China) saved by @InstantMediaBot
❤1
https://youtu.be/skXhpuYqaAM?si=5qBvjAEDnHNDeMHr
👍2🔥1
Perfect, so dystopian (@foundconscious) [1:44] · 1.3K views · May 30, 2026 · 135 likes · 4 comments · mp4 540p [1.8 MB] Robert O. Becker 🗣️ Legend. saved by @InstantMediaBot
❤1
thescouseoracle [1:54] · 8.3K views · Jun 1, 2026 · 1.6K likes · 78 comments · mp4 540p [7.2 MB] What’s in the document… #digital #identity #data #gov #UK saved by @InstantMediaBot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aewarminds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,000,775 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@aewarminds named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Æwar Minds Channel” (@aewarminds), 2,130 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aewarminds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.