Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dr. Alan Mandell

Channel

Dr. Alan Mandell

@alan_mandell_official

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,804subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002116529219
TypeChannel
Username@alan_mandell_official
Created15 February 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/alan_mandell_official

Growth

22,74422,80822,7766 August 2026 — 22,746 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,750 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,747 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,744 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,756 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,785 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,802 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,799 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,806 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,808 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,804 subscribers22,8046 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,734–22,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 06:1322,804-4
14 Aug 2026, 18:3822,808+2
13 Aug 2026, 06:5622,806+7
12 Aug 2026, 10:1522,799-3
11 Aug 2026, 10:1222,802+17
10 Aug 2026, 10:5822,785+29
9 Aug 2026, 12:3622,756+12
8 Aug 2026, 14:5022,744-3
7 Aug 2026, 14:2122,747-3
6 Aug 2026, 14:3122,750+4
6 Aug 2026, 06:3322,746first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 22,804 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,720
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held53 (31 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total144,054
Reactions total1,964
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
22m 25s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,845 reactions across 49 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
98453.3%
👍65835.7%
🔥764.12%
💯532.87%
🙏271.46%
🤔211.14%
🤯70.379%
🥴50.271%
🤓40.217%
🎉30.163%
👏30.163%
❤‍🔥10.054%
😁10.054%
😱10.054%
🤬10.054%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,964reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC834 views12 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

🦶 One Ankle Injury Can Affect You for Years Most people think ankle arthritis develops simply because of aging. But research tells a different story. 📊 Nearly 3 out of 4 cases of ankle arthritis are linked to a previous injury, most commonly an ankle sprain. Unlike the knee or hip—where age-related wear is a major factor—the ankle usually becomes arthritic because of trauma that occurred years, or even decades, earli

7👍2💯2🤔1

15 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,100 views39 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

LOVE YOURSELF FIRST! Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

33👍6

14 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC≈1,910 views43 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

In the early 1900s, grounding was not a wellness “fad” for many, it was an elegant way of life. Copper and brass walking sticks were not just elite society accessories; they were made to serve as a connection. Why copper and brass? By choosing conductive metals like copper to keep a physical bond between the hand and the ground, people hoped to: • Calm Inflammation: Releasing static buildup and aligning the body w

👍269🙏8

14 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC≈1,490 views14 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Lisa (48) from Arizona had struggled with stubborn belly weight for years. She tried everything. Low-carb diets. Evening walks. Short home workouts she found online. But the results never lasted. Some weeks she would lose a little weight… and then gain it back just as quickly. What frustrated her the most was the constant bloating and the feeling that her metabolism had simply slowed down with age. One night wh

13🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTC≈1,610 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Have you ever been disappointed in yourself? Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

29👍5🙏3

13 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈1,910 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

These 4 Core Exercises Burn Belly Fat and Keep Your Back Strong 🔥 Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

👍258🙏2

13 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈1,880 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

What Habit is Hurting Your Health? Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

20👍17

13 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC≈1,880 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Stop Pushing! Watch This First Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

👍278

13 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,010 views45 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Oil pulling with coconut oil is a time-tested Ayurvedic practice that helps eliminate harmful oral bacteria, reduce plaque buildup, and support healthier gums. Rich in antimicrobial compounds like lauric acid, coconut oil has been shown to combat Streptococcus mutans, one of the primary bacteria responsible for tooth decay and gum disease. Clinical studies have found that oil pulling can significantly decrease plaqu

24👍15🔥4💯2

12 Aug 2026, 21:43 UTC≈2,090 views35 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Cooling off with these Blueberry Coconut Popsicles 🍯🫐Made with just coconut water, blueberries, lime, and a touch of honey. These popsicles hydrate with natural electrolytes, deliver antioxidants that support cognitive function, and offer a bright, lightly sweet flavor. Ingredients: * 1 cup blueberries * ¾ cup coconut water * 1 tbsp honey or agave * 1 tsp lime juice Instructions: 1. Blend all ingredients until smoo

22👍13

12 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈1,820 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Forwarded from @elixir_youth1Photo

“14 million Americans lost their jobs to AI and automation in 2026.” — Forbes While people lose their paychecks, corporations put AI to work and consolidate control over technology, land, and assets. The new era will divide society into two groups: those replaced by technology and those whose assets grow because of it. I’m Richard Shapiro. After 20 years at Goldman Sachs, I learned to recognize change before it be

8🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈2,020 views23 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Video

Follow me: Dr. Alan Mandell✅️

17👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @alan_mandell_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@alan_mandell_official edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,113 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Barbara O'Neill
@BarbaraOneill_official · 109,565
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
Cruel History
@cruel_historyy · 104,507
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dr. Alan Mandell” (@alan_mandell_official), 22,804 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/alan_mandell_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.