Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Арсений Ким

Channel

Арсений Ким

@arseniy_kim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,103subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403402464
TypeChannel
Username@arseniy_kim
DescriptionВ этом канале ты узнаешь, как быть в прекрасной физической форме используя собственное тело и здравый смысл Начни с вот этого поста: https://t.me/arseniy_kim/1256
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/arseniy_kim

Growth

14,09614,11414,1057 August 2026 — 14,104 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,104 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,110 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,113 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,114 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,112 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,105 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,096 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,103 subscribers14,1037 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,093–14,117 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:4714,103+7
16 Aug 2026, 08:2614,096-9
14 Aug 2026, 17:2714,105-7
13 Aug 2026, 08:1414,112-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:5514,114+1
11 Aug 2026, 09:1214,113+3
9 Aug 2026, 10:3214,110+2
8 Aug 2026, 09:5614,108+4
7 Aug 2026, 08:5514,104no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:4714,104first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 14,103 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total48,740
Reactions total935
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
622
Videos
64
Links
362

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
35m 16s
Average length
4m 25s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

935 reactions across 18 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥39442.1%
25627.4%
👍17218.4%
424.49%
👏282.99%
custom 5471883477219549006262.78%
custom 581691559901974139580.856%
🤔50.535%
🤯30.321%
🎉10.107%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 935reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @arseniy_kim. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,380 views73 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

С каждым переездом коробок становится больше, а нервов меньше. В какой ещё ситуации фраза «давай спокойно всё обсудим» звучит в три часа ночи, стоя на горе из вещей и держа в руках скотч 😅

🔥4522👏5custom 54718834772195490061

13 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,670 views81 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

А что вообще сегодня считается нормой? Я по образованию социолог, и меня всегда интересовал один вопрос: "Почему одни вещи мы воспринимаем как совершенно нормальные, а другие — как что-то странное?" Причём сама «норма» постоянно меняется. То, что ещё несколько десятилетий назад могло казаться совершенно диким, сегодня становится обыденностью. И наоборот — вещи, которые столетиями воспринимались обществом как данно

🔥42👍22custom 581691559901974139585custom 54718834772195490064

10 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,440 views108 reactions3 Starsread 17 August 2026
Video

На прошлой неделе был на свадьбе Романа Овчарова (из канала BIOMACHINE). Подснял пару кадров для вас. Из интересного — очень много гостей на свадьбе подходили, делились, как начинали с моих тренировок и растяжек 5–8 лет назад. Впервые за долгое время почувствовал себя старым. Хотя внутренне ощущаю себя максимум на 25, надеюсь, и внешне тоже.

57👍33custom 547188347721954900613🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈3,070 views29 reactionsread 17 August 2026

@autkin68 (Антон), огромное спасибо за искренность и готовность поделиться не только красивым результатом, но и своими ошибками, трудными периодами и выводами. Такие разговоры особенно ценны, потому что это не теория о том, как «правильно». Это опыт человека, который продолжает развиваться, строить семью и становиться лучше. Тем, кто пока не состоит в Клубе 6/1, но чувствует, что уже созрел присоединиться к нашему

15👍9🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC≈2,660 views45 reactionsread 17 August 2026

20 принципов гармоничных отношений: честный разговор с победителем конкурса «Семья года» Изначально я хотел выложить этот эфир целиком. Но он длится почти три часа и предназначался для участников Клуба 6/1. Поэтому мы подготовили сокращённую версию — выжимку главных мыслей и инсайтов из нашего разговора с Антоном Уткиным. Антон — участник Клуба 6/1, отец троих детей. Недавно его семья победила во всероссийском кон

40🔥5

6 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,810 views11 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥54👍2

6 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,970 views63 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Небольшой влог о том, как прошла прошлая неделя. Семья, друзья, отдых, спорт. Кстати, на тему семьи у нас в клубе прошёл отдельный эфир с участником (писал об этом тут). Разобрали 10 пунктов, что делать и чего не делать, чтобы построить гармоничные отношения. Сегодня опубликую запись. Ставьте ⚡️, кому будет полезно.

42🔥163👍2

4 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC≈2,360 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Как на самом деле работает наша офлайн-группа (и почему это не просто «потренить в зале») Ребята, решил записать аудио-заметку, а по итогу — держите текстом. Часто слышу вопрос: «А что у вас там происходит? Чем отличается от клуба?». Если в двух словах — это другая вселенная. Сейчас поясню, в чём принцип: 1. Мы не просто делаем упражнения, а идём к цели Когда ты занимаешься один, это обычно выглядит так: пришёл,

🔥127

31 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC≈3,190 views104 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

Кайфовать от лета, катаясь на велике, пока есть такая возможность. ✅ DONE

🔥68👍2114custom 54718834772195490061

30 Jul 2026, 18:51 UTC≈3,110 views35 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Я часто говорю про клуб как про тело, форму, энергию. Но прикол в том, что хорошая физическая форма, здоровье и энергичность часто подтягивают за собой все остальное: семью, отношения, то что на самом деле важнее всего. И я подумал — многие из вас тоже имеют семью или хотели бы ее создать, и вероятно вам было бы полезно получить тот опыт, который есть у Антона. Поэтому в субботу в клубе мы проведем эфир на тему —

18👍11🔥6

28 Jul 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,770 views39 reactions2 Starsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Интервальные тренировки Да, вы все ответили правильно в комментариях к предыдущему посту. Каждый понедельник у нас в клубе и на моих программах начинается с подобной тренировки, и вот почему. У современного человека вечная проблема: голова весь день работает на пределе, а тело почти не работает вообще. При этом самое главное, у всех хроническая нехватка времени. Интервальные тренировки решают эту проблему Суть пр

🔥22👍76custom 54718834772195490064

28 Jul 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,350 views24 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Кто, например, понимает, что это такое?)

👍19🤔5

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @arseniy_kim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTCAnonymous Poll578 voters

Ребята, кто из вас бегает?

  1. Бегаю регулярно18%
  2. Бегаю нерегулярно20%
  3. Бегаю редко20%
  4. Не бегаю вообще42%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,181,822 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Арсений Ким” (@arseniy_kim), 14,103 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arseniy_kim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.