Channel
@numberone_crypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
772subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001821175637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @numberone_crypto |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/numberone_crypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 772 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 775 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:38 | 775 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (15 June 2026 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 94 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
59 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5827778898456219561 | 17 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5825741284366618718 | 14 | 23.7% | |
| custom 5850548276733939864 | 13 | 22.0% | |
| custom 5433964911770225918 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5077829135573714360 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| custom 5314447198967046292 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.69% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @numberone_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 17 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Есть предположение, что GRAM (бывший TON) станет токенизированными акциями Telegram Посмотрим что из этого будет в итоге (IPO Telegram еще не было)
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
Удивительно, но сегодня случайно на работе встретил человека, который так же торгует криптовалютой.
custom 58257412843666187182custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
BTC еще одно крупное движение в область 40-49 тыс $ и с большей вероятностью это дно. Вероятен провал к трендовой и выход за нее с резким возвратом (это прям база )
custom 58277788984562195611
Signed numberone
Открыть кросс Лонг по 35-40 🤔 Самое сложное это вытерпеть 1000 дней роста.
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
lol
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
Время шортов еще не закончилось
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
Каким-то чудесным образом все ещё держит планку , но вопрос времени обвала до 30-35 тыс через 40К, покупать можно начать от 40 и все, что ниже
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
#бетховенживи
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
🟠 #BTCUSDT FUTURES Входить в шорт по тренду от 67000-67300 после сбора ликвидности и подтверждения нисходящего тренда Подтверждением будет слив одной свечой после сбора ликвидности, стоп за максимум SL 1% TP 59000$
custom 58257412843666187181custom 58277788984562195611custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
Биткоин ? Не рискованно, лучше в облигации, тем временем предложения депутатов: В Госдуме призвали немедленно изъять из банков не менее 30 триллионов рублей вкладов граждан для пополнения бюджета РФ По словам главы КПРФ Геннадия Зюганова, «в условиях войны» 67 триллионов рублей граждан и 63 триллиона рублей предприятий просто лежат на банковских счетах и не работают на экономику России: «Это три государственных б…
custom 58277788984562195612custom 58257412843666187181custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
22 июня, согласно мониторингу Onchain Lens, новый адрес открыл шорт-позицию на сумму 6,68 млн долларов США с плечом 20x по BTC, ETH и SOL. Стоимость шорт-позиций составляет соответственно 27 млн, 13 млн и 7 млн долларов США.
Signed numberone
Выбрал список из 26 монет, которые буду накапливать Основные позиции будут по #ETH #SOLANA #TON #LINK Все остальное набор по 50-100$, чтобы в случае чего не было FOMO Посмотрел историю монет сейчас, могут лежать долго на дне и двумя прострелами за пару месяцев дать по 30-50 иксов +
custom 58277788984562195612custom 58257412843666187181custom 58505482767339398641
Signed numberone
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @numberone_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NUMBER ONE CRYPTO” (@numberone_crypto), 772 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/numberone_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.