Quan điểm cá nhân , k phải lời khuyên đầu tư
✅ G Trend: @TrendCrypto_TCX
📊 TẠO TÀI KHOẢN GIAO DỊCH VÀNG, INDEX, NGOẠI HỐI NGAY HÔM NAY
✍️ Đăng ký tài khoản trade EXNESS : https://one.exnessonelink.com/a/bgmgnk4yxo
✅Contact MKT : @Vanshuka_TCX
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -163. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,905–14,116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 09:28
13,929
-27
15 Aug 2026, 18:23
13,956
-23
14 Aug 2026, 04:59
13,979
-15
12 Aug 2026, 23:34
13,994
-29
12 Aug 2026, 00:06
14,023
-24
10 Aug 2026, 21:24
14,047
-13
9 Aug 2026, 21:31
14,060
-17
8 Aug 2026, 18:01
14,077
-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:01
14,079
-13
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
14,092
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:58
14,092
first reading
Engagement
99 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.20%
avg views ÷ 13,929 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,000
97 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
99
of 99 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
99 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
97,216
Reactions total
1,283
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
199
Videos
13
Links
54
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
12m 37s
Average length
1m 35s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,283 reactions across 97 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
270
21.0%
😁
266
20.7%
🤩
256
20.0%
🔥
235
18.3%
👏
234
18.2%
❤
22
1.71%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 97 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ngày thì cứ tềnh tàng thế thôi, Lụm 3-5R/ngày cùng chỉ báo TCX Indicator Pro là quá đơn giản
Anh em nào chưa biết cách sử dụng chỉ báo TCX Indicator Pro có thể xem qua một vài video hướng dẫn sử dụng dưới đây:
▶️ 1. Hướng dẫn nhận chỉ báo FREE: TẠI ĐÂY
▶️ 2. Giới thiệu qua về chỉ báo TCX Indicator Pro: TẠI ĐÂY
▶️ 3. Hướng dẫn add chỉ báo TCX vào Tradingview: TẠI ĐÂY
▶️ 4. Phân tích ưu điểm và nhược điểm của chỉ …
Ae lưu ý , sáng nay có 1 pha fake tín hiệu và stoplost 1 lệnh lúc 6h sáng. Phần đa lúc mở phiên là lúc dễ bị fake và nhiễu tín hiệu. Nên những lúc mới mở phiên như này ae hạn chế vào lệnh
TUY NHIÊN: Chỉ báo vẫn bá vl. Lúc stoplost lệnh BUY xong, tín hiệu ra 1 lệnh sell ngay lập tức và đạt tp 3 ăn 9 giá sell . Ăn xong lệnh SELL , chỉ báo tung ra 1 lệnh BUY giá 4372 và chạy full tp 4384, rồi tiếp tục chạy nốt sóng 40…
Sáng 14.8, Hội nghị Công nghệ TP.HCM - Conviction 2026 do Hội Truyền thông Điện tử TP.HCM, Liên đoàn Thương mại và Công nghiệp Việt Nam (VCCI) cùng Ban tổ chức Conviction tổ chức diễn ra tại TP.HCM. Với chủ đề tập trung vào công nghệ Blockchain, tài sản số và trí tuệ nhân tạo (AI), Conviction 2026 thu hút được sự tham gia của lãnh đạo các ban ngành, doanh nghiệp trong và ngoài nước.
Tại phiên thảo luận đầu tiên ngay…
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @TrendCryptoTCX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TrendCryptoTCX edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 899,665 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Hidden Gems @airdrop_hiddengems · 180,671 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
ThuanCapital @ThuanCapital · 91,406 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 17 August 2026
Thông báo Baby Doge @BabyDogeAnnVI · 89,745 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Channel Trend Crypto - GOLD 🏛” (@TrendCryptoTCX), 13,929 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TrendCryptoTCX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.