Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

MegaLodon Futures 🐳

@MegaLodonFutures

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,095subscribers

-2,234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669847400
TypeChannel
Username@MegaLodonFutures
Description🚨Kênh cập nhật tin tức thị trường tài chính, chia sẻ kiến thức phân tích kỹ thuật và góc nhìn cá nhân về Crypto. Admin : @LouisMegaLodon
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/MegaLodonFutures

Growth

52,09554,32953,2127 August 2026 — 54,329 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,329 subscribers7 August 2026 — 54,286 subscribers8 August 2026 — 54,227 subscribers9 August 2026 — 54,133 subscribers10 August 2026 — 54,089 subscribers11 August 2026 — 54,039 subscribers12 August 2026 — 52,095 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2,234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,760–54,664 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:5552,095-1,944
11 Aug 2026, 19:2354,039-50
10 Aug 2026, 20:4254,089-44
9 Aug 2026, 23:3454,133-94
8 Aug 2026, 22:2154,227-59
7 Aug 2026, 19:2554,286-43
7 Aug 2026, 07:3054,329no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:1854,329first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.7%
avg views ÷ 52,095 subscribers
Avg views / post
16,000
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
59
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held59 (5 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total927,060
Reactions total177,001
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
858
Videos
34
Links
135

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 02s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

177,001 reactions across 58 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
88,79550.2%
👍88,20649.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177,001reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,720 views207 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#AT /USDT – LONG Entry: 0.1688 - 0.1278 ❌ Stoploss: 0.0950 TP: 20% 30% X2

👍11691

13 Aug 2026, 05:07 UTC≈7,470 views1,396 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#ZEC /USDT – LONG Entry: 497 - 420 ❌ Stoploss: 363 TP: 20% 30% X2

734👍662

13 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC≈8,140 views1,928 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Anh em theo lâu chắc cũng biết rồi, qua tháng 9 luật chơi bắt đầu chặt hơn, nên mình cũng phải xoay bài cho hợp thời thế 😎 Từ giờ bớt đánh lung tung, tập trung hẳn sang HÀNG HÓA cho dễ chiến, dễ quản lý. 🤑 1 Tuần nay test MT5 thấy khá ngon: vào lệnh nhanh, thoát lệnh mượt, đánh vàng hàng hóa cực ổn 👍 Nếu chạy ngon như hiện tại thì thời gian tới mình chuyển dần cả team sang hướng này. Market đổi thì mình đổi. Miễn

1,010👍918

12 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC≈10,900 views3,050 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#ACE /USDT – LONG Entry: 0.12120 - 0.0824 ❌ Stoploss: 0.05915 TP: 20% 30% X2

1,540👍1,510

12 Aug 2026, 06:36 UTC≈4,420 views2,910 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @MegaLodonGOLDForexPhoto

VIP Được chăm sóc tận tình lại còn FREE 🤑

👍1,5101,400

12 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC≈9,300 views2,920 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @MegaLodonGOLDForexPhoto

3 Ngày X5 Tài Khoản 🤑🤑🤑

1,470👍1,450

11 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈18,100 views2,950 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#CAP/USDT – LONG Entry: 0.05264 - 0.03682 ❌ Stoploss: 0.02847

1,480👍1,470

11 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC≈35,100 views3,010 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#INX/USDT – LONG Entry: 0.009115 - 0.007219 ❌ Stoploss: 0.006471

👍1,5201,490

11 Aug 2026, 11:30 UTC≈3,540 views3,230 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥 ANH EM NHÓM FOREX ĐANG HÚP VÀNG CỰC CĂNG! 🤑 🥇 Kèo XAUUSD lên liên tục – anh em bám đúng plan là có cái để ăn! 🎁 ĐẶC BIỆT: ĐANG CÓ EVENT TẶNG TIỀN CHO THÀNH VIÊN MỚI : TẠI ĐÂY ⚡ Vào nhóm nhận ưu đãi event có giới hạn ➡️ https://t.me/MegaLodonGOLDForex

1,650👍1,580

11 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC≈3,550 views3,120 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

#FLOW +154% Market không chờ đợi bất kì ai và cơ hội cũng vậy, chỉ có gia nhập VIP mới nắm bắt được điều đó Hướng dẫn tham gia nhóm thực chiến

1,580👍1,540

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @MegaLodonFutures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 183,475
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MegaLodon Futures 🐳” (@MegaLodonFutures), 52,095 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MegaLodonFutures.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.