Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 94 days, net -6,302. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 22:21
29,664
+29,641
11 Nov 2026, 02:57
23
-29,783
10 Nov 2026, 12:54
29,806
-110
8 Nov 2026, 23:07
29,916
-69
7 Nov 2026, 15:19
29,985
-45
6 Nov 2026, 11:50
30,030
-72
5 Nov 2026, 14:16
30,102
-69
4 Nov 2026, 12:11
30,171
+30,151
3 Nov 2026, 11:31
20
-30,216
3 Nov 2026, 10:06
30,236
-74
2 Nov 2026, 09:19
30,310
-28
1 Nov 2026, 11:39
30,338
-67
31 Oct 2026, 14:20
30,405
-64
30 Oct 2026, 16:59
30,469
-70
29 Oct 2026, 17:20
30,539
-71
28 Oct 2026, 15:07
30,610
-59
27 Oct 2026, 18:10
30,669
+30,648
27 Oct 2026, 06:37
21
-30,700
26 Oct 2026, 20:08
30,721
-51
25 Oct 2026, 21:06
30,772
first reading
Engagement
146 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.37%
avg views ÷ 29,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
999
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.885%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 146 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
146 (6 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
18,978
Reactions total
168
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
37
Videos
1
Links
13
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
11m 33s
Average length
3m 51s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,484 reactions across 143 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,754
79.0%
😁
307
8.81%
👍
142
4.08%
😭
77
2.21%
🤣
74
2.12%
🔥
49
1.41%
👏
21
0.603%
😱
14
0.402%
👌
12
0.344%
🤔
11
0.316%
😢
7
0.201%
🥰
6
0.172%
🍓
4
0.115%
❤🔥
3
0.086%
😍
1
0.029%
🤡
1
0.029%
🤯
1
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 143 of the 146 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,484 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 146 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
BTC has now reached the $70K area, and the market is still playing out very close to my previous expectations. My next downside targets are $68K and $65K.
I’ve already started gradually accumulating spot BTC, allocating around 5–10% of my total portfolio so far. I’ll wait for the next target zones before adding more, with a long-term holding plan through 2028.
The key is to spread capital across different price lev…
I’ve received over $3,300 in funding fees from holding my BTC short positions.
My first target around $73K has now been reached, with BTC touching $73,380 today.
I’ve closed part of my short positions and started gradually accumulating spot BTC as part of my long-term investment plan through the end of 2027.
My next downside targets for the coming month are $68K and $65K.
This is my personal market view and tradi…
📊 Exclusive for new users: Up to $10,000 for CFD accounts & Up to 100% deposit cashback!
Claim Credit Vouchers to boost your trading capital and trade CFDs with confidence.
🎁 Tasks & Rewards:
→ First Deposit of $50 - Get a $50 USDx Credit Voucher credited to your CFD account
→ Higher Deposit Tiers - Unlock Vouchers up to $5,000 USDx
→ First CFD Trade of min. 0.01 lot XAU - Receive a $200 USDx Credit Voucher
Availa…
BTC has now reached the Daily EMA200, while momentum indicators are also approaching oversold territory.
We could see a minor recovery over the next 1–2 days, potentially toward the $79.5K–$80K zone, before the broader downtrend resumes, with further downside targets around $73K and $68K.
This is my personal market view, not financial or investment advice.
🎃 Last Chance - Earn Points, Redeem BXClusive Rewards
October is almost over, and Halloween is just around the corner!
Have you joined the night gift hunt?
🎁 The gift vault is waiting for you:
→ Premium Cartier jewelry, Porsche cars, Cybertruck
→ Samsung and Apple tech gifts, Ferrari racing simulator,...
→ Exclusive BingX merch, Hot Tokens & Voucher Bonus
🧛♂️ Join in 3 simple steps:
1️⃣ Go to BXClusive and r…
Things are gradually playing out as expected!
BTC has now reached the $77K level. The next key downside targets I’m watching are $73K and $68K.
Patience is key at this stage.
Some of the altcoins I’ve been waiting to accumulate have now reached the levels where I can start buying gradually. Others haven’t dropped to my target zones yet, so I’ll continue to wait patiently for better entries.
No need to rush. Let t…
🔥 3 Simple missions - New users claim $20 Each!
Calling all new BingX traders, have you claimed your welcome perks yet?
Event Details:
✅ First Net Deposit of $20 - Get $2
✅ First Futures trade of $100 - Get $3
✅ Trade for 3 active days, $100 daily volume - Get an extra $15
The event ends on October 31, 2026!
Learn more here: https://bingx.com/en/activity/task/6899609204?themeType=2
--
• New users can …
BTC has held the $79K support zone well and now looks ready to enter a Daily timeframe recovery move. Over the next few days, I’m watching for a potential move toward $84K.
However, my broader outlook for the next 1–2 months remains bearish, with BTC potentially moving toward the $73K–$68K zone.
As for Gold, we could see a recovery above $4,300 before the medium-term downtrend resumes, with a downside target around…
🌕 Share $5,000,000 Prize Pool at SuperX October Halloween Party!
Get ready to hunt for rewards with BingX:
👻 Step 1: Register
→ Get a free airdrop
→ Unlock rewards based on your luck
👻 Step 2: Complete Tasks & Spin the Lucky Wheel
→ Trade Futures/Spot, Copy Trading, upgrade your VIP level and more
→ Get a chance to win Voucher Bonus worth up to $200, Wealth APR Boost Vouchers worth up to $500, hot tokens and more
…
❤4👍1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @cryptohotelchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@cryptohotelchannel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
18 October 2026
Most recent edit
18 October 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
QUANG PHÁP AIRDROP | Chanel @airdropquangphap · 20,842 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 19 September 2026
days1000crypto @days1000crypto · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 2 September 2026
Đầu tư cho người mới 🆕 @dautuchonguoimoibtc · 22,725 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
5 Phút Research | Channel @fiveminutes_research · 21,900 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 September 2026
DTL Channels 🇻🇳 @DTLChannels · 70,026 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 August 2026
Dân Cày Airdrop 💎💙 @dancayairdrop · 69,105 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
ONUS Announcements @onus_newsroom · 191,266 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Thông báo Baby Doge @BabyDogeAnnVI · 74,615 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 17 August 2026
Number++ @numb3rdp · 32,799 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
Futures Color @futucolorr · 36,355 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
Ronin Crypto Lab @ronincryptolab · 25,667 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
goldminer_app @GoldMiner_App · 2 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
reviewcryptoo @reviewcryptoo · 1 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 September 2026
DGPub Retroactive Channel @dg_pub · 29,242 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Time Hotel” (@cryptohotelchannel), 29,664 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptohotelchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.