🔽 Khối lượng giao dịch giao ngay trên các sàn giao dịch tập trung giảm xuống mức thấp nhất trong hai năm Tháng 7 năm 2026 là tháng có hoạt động giao dịch giao ngay yếu nhất trên các sàn giao dịch tập trung trong vòng hai năm. 🕯 Tổng khối lượng giao dịch giảm xuống 807 tỷ đô la Mỹ, giảm 31% so với tháng trước (tháng 6, đạt 1,17 nghìn tỷ đô la Mỹ) và thấp hơn mức thấp nhất trước đó được ghi nhận vào tháng 4 và tháng …

Channel
DTL Channels 🇻🇳
@DTLChannels
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
80,748subscribers
-487 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001923987540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DTLChannels |
| Description | 🤝 Hợp tác , Booking quảng cáo liên hệ ADMIN : @mitterduy 🇻🇳 Nhóm Chat: @DTLCryptoFree |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DTLChannels |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 80,748 | -127 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 80,875 | -123 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 80,998 | -91 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 81,089 | -79 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 81,168 | -67 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 81,235 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.63%
- avg views ÷ 80,748 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,310
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.216%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 32,810 |
| Reactions total | 42 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈17,800
- Videos
- ≈337
- Links
- ≈9,650
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
42 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 47.6% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 26.2% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 23.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🤑 OpenGradient cáo buộc BitMart có nguy cơ mất khả năng thanh toán CEO OpenGradient cho biết tiền củ đội market-making đang bị kẹt trên BitMart và không thể rút, đồng thời cáo buộc sàn có dấu hiệu mất khả năng thanh toán. Ông cũng cho rằng BitMart từng kêu gọi người dùng khóa tài sản chỉ khoảng một tuần trước khi thông báo đóng cửa, có thể nhằm thu hút thêm thanh khoản. Các cáo buộc hiện chưa được xác minh độc lậ…
🇷🇺 TIN MỚI: Ngân hàng trung ương Nga đề xuất cho phép giao dịch Bitcoin, Ether và USDT trên các sàn giao dịch được quản lý.
🟠 Cập nhật giá vàng trong nước và thế giới hôm nay ➕ Tham Khảo Thị Trường Vàng https://t.me/DTLChannels/22053
🟠 Vàng vừa hồi phục lên vùng 4400$
❤2
😁 Peter Schiff cho rằng Bitcoin là "chống lại vàng", và tuyên bố rằng giá Bitcoin sẽ tiếp tục giảm trong khi giá vàng và bạc tăng lên do tình hình chiến tranh và lạm phát 😁
😁1
💵 Đô giảm quá mà hết tiền để bắt đáy nữa rồi 😁
😁 CẬP NHẬT: Trong năm 2026, tiền điện tử là loại tài sản hoạt động kém nhất so với các loại tài sản khác như vàng, bạc, Nasdaq và Russell 2000.
📱 Tin mới : X sẽ ngừng chương trình tạo thu nhập cho người sáng tạo hiện tại và thay thế bằng chương trình "Chương trình Thưởng Nội dung Nguyên bản" mới. Tất cả người sáng tạo hiện tại sẽ phải đăng ký lại, bắt đầu từ ngày 8 tháng 9. ✏️ Nói 1 cách đơn giản dễ hiểu : X đang muốn chuyển từ trả tiền cho lượng tương tác sang thưởng cho nhà sáng tạo ra nội dung có giá trị thực Chiến này anh em phong bạt rồi rep bài lại …
❤3😁2
🤔 Nếu bạn đã đầu tư 100 đô la mỗi tháng vào tiền điện tử kể từ năm 2022, điều gì sẽ xảy ra? 😁 Tính đến tháng 8 năm 2026, tổng số tiền đã đầu tư vào mỗi loại tài sản sẽ đạt 5.600 đô la, nhưng kết quả sẽ khác nhau đáng kể: TRX — 16.521 đô la | +195,0% BTC — 8.660 đô la | +54,6% XRP — 8.465 đô la | +51,2% SOL — 8.025 đô la | +43,3% ETH — 4.898 đô la | -12,5% ADA — 2.616 đô la | -53,3% 🤯 Tron là lựa chọn tốt nhất tro…
❤1
😁 Bitcoin lấy lại mốc 65.000$
🕯 Khối lượng giao dịch hợp đồng tương lai trên các sàn giao dịch tập trung (CEX) giảm xuống mức thấp nhất kể từ tháng 12 năm 2023. 🔽 Khối lượng giao dịch hợp đồng tương lai trên các sàn CEX đã giảm xuống 4.0 nghìn tỷ đô la vào tháng 7 năm 2026, đạt mức thấp nhất trong 31 tháng. Giai đoạn phục hồi từ tháng 4 đến tháng 6 đã kết thúc, và không sàn giao dịch lớn nào thoát khỏi sự sụt giảm này. 👉 https://cryptorank.i…
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @DTLChannels. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 304,412 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@onus_newsroom · 222,609
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DTL Channels 🇻🇳” (@DTLChannels), 80,748 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DTLChannels.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.