Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 5Money Bitcoin

Channel
@fiveminutes_research
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
23,379subscribers
-106 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002223069566 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fiveminutes_research |
| Description | Kênh thông tin Research đơn giản và dễ hiểu nhất Kênh thông tin mới nhất: https://t.me/Fivemincryptoann Chat : @fiveminutes_research_chat Website : https://5phutcrypto.io X : https://x.com/5phutcrypto_ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fiveminutes_research |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:18 | 23,379 | -20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 23,399 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 23,412 | -12 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 23,424 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 23,434 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 23,447 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 23,462 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 23,478 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 23,483 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 23,485 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 44 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 85,725 |
| Reactions total | 335 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 05:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
335 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 165 | 49.3% | |
| 😁 | 97 | 29.0% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 17.6% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.79% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 1.19% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.597% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.597% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 335reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 5Money Bitcoin
🔥🔥🔥🔥Kaito có thật sự comeback ? Không phủ nhận market hiện tại đang nát như tương, việc coin giảm là bình thường ➡️ Tuy nhiên việc giá $KAITO x6 trong 3 tháng rồi chia 3 chỉ trong 2 tuần khiến cộng đồng đặt dấu chấm hỏi ? Liệu dự án có thật sự đang làm việc hay chỉ bơm tin để hợp thức hóa đường giá ? 💠 Lật lại các sự kiện gần đây, chúng ta có: + Ngày 23/7: Kaito thông báo đã đạt được thỏa thuận với X và comeback …
😁4❤2👍1
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
🔥🔥🔥🔥Lighter chi 11 triệu $LIT (26 triệu đô) để giành thị phần trên Robinhood Chain - Dòng tiền vẫn tiếp tục fomo 💠 Sự fomo trên Robinhood Chain vẫn chưa hạ nhiệt với các bộ sưu tập NFT thì Lighter lại bơm thêm incentive, cụ thể: + Từ hôm nay ae có thể cày volume perp để kiếm point ngay trên Robinhood app hoặc Lighter App (chain Robinhood) + Pool thưởng 11 triệu $LIT sẽ được chia dựa trên số point ae kiếm được + T…
❤4😁4👍3
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 5Money Bitcoin
🔥🔥🔥🔥Cập nhật vụ hack 4 tỷ $ONE - 26% nguồn cung từ Harmony Sau khi $ONE chia 99% từ đỉnh thì vụ hack vừa qua đã khiến token mất thêm 50% giá trị 💠 Thay vì đóng băng, theo dõi ví hacker hoặc buy back hỗ trợ holder thì team lại đi rollback blockchain 💠 Nước đi này làm cộng đồng holder phản ứng dữ dội trên X, lý do là vì: + Không thu hồi được phần lớn lợi nhuận của hacker: vì token giả đã bán hết trên CEX, rollback …
😁6❤2👍1
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
🔥🔥🔥🔥Tại Sao người dùng nên tránh xa token Ondo - Sự thật mà 99,9% dự án crypto đang gặp phải ? Sao vàng tăng, cổ phiếu tăng vù vù, còn token crypto thì cứ cắm đầu lao dốc mãi ? ➡️Bài viết ngắn dưới đây sẽ trả lời rõ ràng cho bạn, và gợi ý cách chọn dự án “làm thật ăn thật” cho mùa tới 💠 TVL tăng, sản phẩm ship thật - Mùa downtrend này, nhiều dự án chung tình trạng: không user, không doanh thu, không câu chuyện gì…
❤6😁6👍4
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
🔥🔥🔥🔥Variational tuyên chiến với các sàn perpdex - Nhận ngay 150 nghìn điểm + 1 triệu đô khi là active trader Cuộc đua tranh giành thị phần perpdex đang nóng hơn bao giờ hết. Mới đây sàn Variational từng gọi vốn hơn 50 triệu đô đã chạy 1 chiến dịch đánh thẳng vào tệp người dùng active trước đó, cụ thể: + Nếu bạn là top 10k trader active mạnh trên các sàn Hyperliquid, Aster, Lighter,.. có thể vào đây để check phần t…
❤6😁3👍2
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 5Money Bitcoin
🔥🔥🔥🔥Thêm trường hợp không rút được tiền từ Bitmart - Làm gì để giảm thiểu rủi ro khi để tiền trên sàn ? Sau dự án và MM phốt Bitmart thì ad cũng nhận được 1 vài trường hợp nhắn tin về cho kênh là không rút được tiền 💠 Qua câu chuyện đợt rồi thì ae để tiền trên sàn cũng nên chuẩn bị cho những trường hợp xấu nhất. Một số nguyên tắc vàng ae nên nắm: + Chỉ để tiền trên sàn cho các giao dịch ngắn hạn + Ưu tiên sàn top…
❤7😁7👍4
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 5Money Bitcoin
🔥🔥🔥🔥Dòng tiền đổ vào Robinhood chain - Dev NFT lại tranh thủ kiếm tiền ? Sau cơn sốt meme, cơn sóng tiếp theo được đẩy trên Robinhood là NFT 💠 Cụ thể hôm nay ColeThereum, từng là co founder của Pudgy Penguins đã ra mắt bộ sưu tập Spritehood Wisps trên Rohinbooh với supply 44444 NFT 💠 Phí mint phiên bản thường là 17 đô và Death Knight và 117 đô 💠 Bộ sưu tập này nhanh chóng sold out, mang về cho Cole hơn 1,2 triệu…
❤12👍4😁3
Signed Quan Ke Huy |5 Phut
Giữa lúc chứng khoán Mỹ xé tan mọi kháng cự, vàng cũng leo cao thì ngó sang crypto, lại chỉ thấy một sự im ắng đến sốt ruột. Chẳng có câu chuyện mới đủ lớn để kéo dòng tiền vào, CLARITY Act bị trì hoãn và Saylor lại bán Bitcoin…Cụ hết thời thật rồi sao? Tầm này có nên buông tay, đứng ngoài hay làm gì khác? 👉AE đọc dự báo tuần này tại đây nhé: https://5phutcrypto.io/du-bao-thi-truong-tuan-33-nam-2026/
❤9👍3😁2
Signed Hoang
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @fiveminutes_research. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
AE thấy chương trình kiếm tiền mới trên X thế nào ?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 55,497 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5Money Research | Channel” (@fiveminutes_research), 23,379 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fiveminutes_research.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.