Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ESPN FC

Channel

ESPN FC

@Espnfc_news

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

62,279subscribers

-194 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601713192
TypeChannel
Usernames@Espnfc_news @footballnews
DescriptionCovering Football Around The World⚽️🌎 Ads: @Source_Ads, https://telega.io/c/Espnfc_news Admin: @charles_de_gaulle *Unofficial. No copyright intended.
CreatedBetween 1 October 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Espnfc_news

Growth

62,27962,47362,3765 August 2026 — 62,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62,459 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62,457 subscribers6 August 2026 — 62,461 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,454 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,453 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,453 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,445 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,446 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,433 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,417 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,409 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,409 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,399 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,396 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,388 subscribers13 August 2026 — 62,385 subscribers14 August 2026 — 62,382 subscribers14 August 2026 — 62,368 subscribers15 August 2026 — 62,361 subscribers16 August 2026 — 62,341 subscribers16 August 2026 — 62,325 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62,283 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62,282 subscribers18 August 2026 — 62,280 subscribers18 August 2026 — 62,279 subscribers5 August 202618 August 2026
27 measurements spanning 13 days, net -194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,250–62,502 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 23:0862,279-1
18 Aug 2026, 20:4362,280-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:1762,282-1
17 Aug 2026, 19:0862,283-42
16 Aug 2026, 22:2662,325-16
16 Aug 2026, 13:4562,341-20
15 Aug 2026, 17:2262,361-7
14 Aug 2026, 19:2662,368-14
14 Aug 2026, 07:4662,382-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:0562,385-3
12 Aug 2026, 23:5662,388-8
12 Aug 2026, 10:3862,396-3
12 Aug 2026, 01:3362,399-10
11 Aug 2026, 11:4762,409no change
11 Aug 2026, 00:4462,409-8
10 Aug 2026, 08:4762,417-16
10 Aug 2026, 00:0162,433-13
9 Aug 2026, 07:1662,446+1
9 Aug 2026, 00:5162,445-8
8 Aug 2026, 10:1662,453first reading

Engagement

128 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.84%
avg views ÷ 62,279 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,130
128 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
128
of 128 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held128 (3 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total784,310
Reactions total14,286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 01:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
16,200
Videos
4
Links
2,150

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 02s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,734 reactions across 121 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7,67655.9%
👍4,05329.5%
🤣9576.97%
😁1551.13%
🤩1461.06%
💔1421.03%
👌1090.794%
👎670.488%
🏆600.437%
❤‍🔥590.43%
🔥500.364%
🕊480.349%
🤡330.24%
🌚260.189%
🥴230.167%
🙏170.124%
😍160.116%
🤯160.116%
🤮150.109%
👏140.102%
9 further kinds520.379%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 128 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC≈2,790 views69 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Jose Mourinho says he feels back at home in Madrid 🤍

🤣4721🤩1

18 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈3,420 views81 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

When Rodri celebrated right above Bernardo Silva after Silva missed a header late in stoppage time in the World Cup round of 16. Former teammates, now ElClásico rivals ⚔️😳

❤‍🔥5919🌚3

18 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈3,750 views60 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Wayne Rooney's advice for Marcus Rashford returning to @ManchesterUnited 👀

60

18 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈3,790 views124 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Rodri starting a new chapter as a @BarcelonaEn player ❤️💙

113🥰7👍4

18 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC≈4,620 views76 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Virgil van Dijk on building a relationship with his two new CB teammates 🤝: 🗣️ "Jeremy’s English is, I would say, a bit better than Ronald's, but at the end of the day we are all pretty good footballers. We can see and smell some moments on how to defend certain situations. But it's pretty clear that you need to form a connection together, and that takes a bit of time. In my opinion, that's absolutely normal, but h

76

18 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC≈4,590 views110 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Jay-Jay Okocha's brilliant story about signing for Bolton Wanderers 😂: 🗣️ "To be honest, I didn't do my research. When I heard about Bolton, it's just 10 minutes away from Manchester, so I was like, 'It's the same level' When I was invited to negotiate, they picked me up at Manchester airport and drove me straight to the stadium. The stadium was beautiful. I had it all with the stadium, the hotel - interesting. Th

🤣8819😁3

18 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC≈4,880 views80 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Luton Town were trailing 3-1 at Reading before manager Jack Wilshere's HT speech inspired a 4-3 comeback win 🧠👏: 🗣️ "Lads, I could stand here and show you some clips, but the truth is, boys, I must be going crazy because I have spent six weeks telling you we drop points against counter-attacking teams. What happens on day one? We concede three goals, three goals, a f---ing hat-trick, lads, come on, please! We can d

71🤩9

18 Aug 2026, 07:53 UTC≈5,330 views5 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

🎾 LOOKING FOR WINNING TENNIS PICKS? 👑 Welcome to ALEXBETS 🎯 Daily Tennis Picks 🆓 FREE Plays every day 💎 VIP & High-Stake Plays 🎰 Tennis Lotto & Challenges 📊 Transparent Results — Wins AND Losses 🔥 RECENT FREE WEEK: +40 UNITS 🏆 €100 → €1,000 LADDER — FIRST TRY ✅ 🔎 Every pick is posted BEFORE the match starts. 🚫 No fake promises. No hidden losses. 📲 JOIN ALEXBETS FOR FREE 👇 👉 @vipalexhub

5

17 Aug 2026, 20:07 UTC≈6,250 views128 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Rodri's tucked-in shirt aesthetic with @Manchester_City's vintage-inspired 2019 Community Shield kit 😮‍💨📸

117👌11

17 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,490 views139 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

Bernardo Silva and @Kylian_Mbappe reunited at the same club 10 years later 🤝

123😁16

17 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈6,320 views158 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Photo

There's no player like Rodri 🪄

🤩8851🤣14🤨3👎1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @Espnfc_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,144,205 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

REAL MADRID C.F.
@Realmadrid_world · 117,707
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Manchester United - Sun Sport
@ManchesterUnitedSunSport · 97,814
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 113,422
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 151,289
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG · 380,893
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
B/R Football
@br_football_news · 79,788
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Premier League
@premier_league_football_news · 86,538
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
VETLAND SPORTS
@vetland_sports_football1 · 110,418
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Manchester City FC
@manchester_city · 128,968
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Just Football
@jfball · 93,992
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
Troll Football
@Troll_Football_Telegram · 142,487
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Here We Go Club
@herewegoclub · 85,780
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
CHELSEA NEWS 🗞️ 🔵
@Chelsea_fc_worldwide · 94,949
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
UNITED CENTRAL🔱🔴
@Utd_Central · 126,303
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 143,225
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 258,422
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
English Premier League Update
@Premier_League_Update · 117,462
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 240,821
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
ESPN FOOTBALL
@Espn_Football_News_UK · 94,563
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
MANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 94,291
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
Premier League
@premier · 131,139
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🔵
@CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,088
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
FC BARCELONA
@barcelonaen · 116,418
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Transfer News Football
@transfer_news_football · 89,720
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domainthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

alexator.com1 post · 5 August 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ESPN FC” (@Espnfc_news), 62,279 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Espnfc_news.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.