In-depth analysis of Chelsea games across all competitions✅👍🏽
❌Content mostly from X
For ads speak to @cobbl or @othcebuch
More channels on: @sky_source
Created
8 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,137. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,027–48,506 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 11:15
47,198
-151
19 Sept 2026, 03:36
47,349
-105
16 Sept 2026, 18:40
47,454
-30
14 Sept 2026, 18:57
47,484
-79
13 Sept 2026, 02:16
47,563
-47
11 Sept 2026, 05:38
47,610
-64
8 Sept 2026, 10:58
47,674
-100
5 Sept 2026, 06:19
47,774
-38
3 Sept 2026, 09:08
47,812
-24
2 Sept 2026, 00:27
47,836
-24
31 Aug 2026, 22:07
47,860
-26
30 Aug 2026, 23:36
47,886
+11
29 Aug 2026, 23:44
47,875
-30
29 Aug 2026, 02:35
47,905
-20
28 Aug 2026, 01:07
47,925
+7
27 Aug 2026, 03:48
47,918
-19
26 Aug 2026, 04:33
47,937
-12
25 Aug 2026, 03:25
47,949
+11
23 Aug 2026, 22:06
47,938
-40
22 Aug 2026, 03:29
47,978
first reading
Engagement
531 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 47,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,050
286 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
288
of 531 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 285 of 286 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
531 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,729,315
Reactions total
30,643
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 04:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈13,200
Videos
≈57
Links
≈786
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
27m 37s
Average length
53s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
69,440 reactions across 526 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
47,486
68.4%
🔥
5,951
8.57%
🤣
4,707
6.78%
👍
2,591
3.73%
😁
1,991
2.87%
🥰
1,117
1.61%
👏
991
1.43%
👎
816
1.18%
🕊
527
0.759%
😭
494
0.711%
😢
438
0.631%
⚡
263
0.379%
🤡
216
0.311%
💔
211
0.304%
🖕
204
0.294%
🙏
154
0.222%
💩
147
0.212%
🎉
121
0.174%
👌
121
0.174%
💯
110
0.158%
35 further kinds
784
1.13%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 527 of the 531 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69,440 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 531 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 528 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ChelseaAnalysis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 531 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚨🇦🇷 The £43 million Garnacho transfer to Aston Villa next summer, as detailed in the loan arrangement with @Chealsea and which will happen if certain targets are hit, is already looking UNLIKELY.
(TomCollomosse) #CFC
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
Just imagine Enzo Fernandez and Enzo Maresca getting relegated and playing Championship football next season. 😭
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
🔵🤕 Jamie Gittens went off with an injury for England U21's today.
Get well soon, Jamie.
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
🚨 Morgan Rogers on @Chealsea's attacking trio:
"The three of us have spoken together about it, but it's not just us, it's a team game. You can score as many goals as you want, but if the other teams are scoring the same amount, you're not going to win games."
(MrDomSmith) #CFC 🏴
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
🚨 Morgan Rogers rates his time at Chelsea so far:
"10 — I’ve enjoyed it. I'm feeling as good as I've ever felt playing, contributing, scoring goals, assists, creating chances, as good as I ever have done in my career. So why would it not be a 10?" 🥶
(MrDomSmith) #CFC
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
🚨 Joao Pedro has been named on the shortlist for the September Premier League Creative Moment of the Month
😍 Register and deposit on 1win with this link and use SSBET1 promocode for 500% bonus on your first deposits!
🚨 FA Statement:
Chelsea FC has been charged with breaching FA Rule E21 during the ninth minute of its Premier League fixture against Fulham FC on 24 August. It’s alleged that the club failed to ensure its spectators and/or supporters did not behave in an improper, offensive, abusive or insulting way.
It’s further alleged that this behaviour was discriminatory in that it included a reference, whether express or impl…
🗣 Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink:
"When you are at a big club, and you lose matches, there's always going to be talk. But I think that Chelsea will have a lot of patience with Alonso, and I think they should have a lot of patience as well."
"So, no. Alonso’s future should not even be a conversation at this moment."
#CFC | #Chelsea
Showing the 12 most recent of 531 posts we hold for @ChelseaAnalysis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ChelseaAnalysis edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 September 2026
Most recent edit
16 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 531 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
CHELSEA NEWS 🗞 🔵 @Chelsea_fc_worldwide · 94,756 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🔵 @CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,376 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
CHELSEA MEDIA 🎥 @ChelseaFC_Media · 22,343 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 September 2026
Chelsea @Chealsea · 33,022 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Premier League 🏆 @PL_PremierLeague · 40,630 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Chelsea - Sun Sport @ChelseaSunSport · 40,671 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
⚽️ Chelsea Football Club 💙 @ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 · 121,712 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
⚽ All About Football ⚽ @Allfootball_01 · 26,030 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
TIA Chelsea Futbal Media @tiacfutbal · 41,176 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
BBC Sport Football @BBC_Sports_Football_Updates · 52,930 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🖤 @chelseafcen · 28,794 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
ESPN FOOTBALL @Espn_Football_News_UK · 93,800 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
LIVERPOOL FC @liverpool_worldwide · 62,593 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
Football @footballfactlys · 32,509 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
FOOTBALL DIGEST @footballdigestt · 25,639 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 September 2026
Troll Football @Troll_Football_Telegram · 145,555 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
Premier League News @Premier_League_News_TG · 261,764 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Cristiano Ronaldo Fans @Cristiano_Ronaldo_7_Fans · 21,553 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Fantasy Premier League @Fantasy_Epl · 31,138 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Transfermarkt @transfermarkt_off · 22,598 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Sky Sports News @skysport_football_official · 51,533 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Lionel Messi Fans @Lionel_Messi_10_Fans · 47,273 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Football XI News Live @footballxilive · 33,149 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
ESPN FC @espnfc1 · 52,928 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 86 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CHELSEA ANALYSIS 📈🔵” (@ChelseaAnalysis), 47,198 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChelseaAnalysis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.