8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,434–17,468 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 15:57
17,438
-9
13 Aug 2026, 02:54
17,447
-2
12 Aug 2026, 03:43
17,449
-10
10 Aug 2026, 02:52
17,459
-5
9 Aug 2026, 00:52
17,464
+2
8 Aug 2026, 02:23
17,462
+3
7 Aug 2026, 19:16
17,459
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:06
17,459
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 17,438 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
66 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.748%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
66
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
66 (5 August 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
134,071
Reactions total
958
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
958 reactions across 63 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
688
71.8%
👍
119
12.4%
🔥
71
7.41%
👎
47
4.91%
😁
24
2.51%
😢
5
0.522%
🤯
3
0.313%
😱
1
0.104%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 958reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗪𝗘 𝗚𝗢: Paris Saint-Germain have agreed a deal to sign Ferran Torres from @BarcelonaEn for €50M.
Torres only wanted to join PSG, with the agreement now sealed after several days at the final stages.
(Source: FabrizioRomano)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Tijjani Reijnders to Al-Qadsiah is 𝗛𝗘𝗥𝗘 𝗪𝗘 𝗚𝗢 done. ✅🇸🇦
The midfielder has given the green light to the move, with a verbal agreement now in place between all parties.
@Manchester_City will receive €61M, with documents being exchanged ahead of signatures. Reijnders did not train today as he waits to fly to Saudi Arabia.
(Source: FabrizioRomano)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Chelsea have given @Manchester_City until 5pm on Friday to make an offer for Enzo Fernandez.
Chelsea value the midfielder at £120M and do not intend to sell him if @Manchester_City fail to meet their demands.
Fernandez has six years left on his Chelsea contract and previously worked with @Manchester_City boss Enzo Maresca.
(Source: SkySports)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Chelsea have received interest from @Benfica and at least one other Premier League club in Tosin Adarabioyo.
The 28-year-old has less than two years left on his contract and is increasingly likely to leave Chelsea permanently.
Tosin is open to exploring other opportunities, with a reunion with former Fulham boss Marco Silva understood to appeal.
(Source: NizaarKinsella)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 @BarcelonaEn are pushing to reach an agreement with @Manchester_City for Rodri within the 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧 𝟰𝟴 𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗥𝗦.
@BarcelonaEn's opening €50M bid was rejected, with @Manchester_City asking around €70M for the midfielder.
The clubs are discussing a €60M-€65M deal including add-ons, while @BarcelonaEn have already agreed terms with Rodri.
(Source: marca)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Paris Saint-Germain are preparing a 𝗡𝗘𝗪 𝗕𝗜𝗗 for Mika Godts as they look to reach an agreement with Ajax.
Ferran Torres is also expected to join PSG soon, with the formal steps of the transfer still to follow.
PSG also have a verbal agreement in place for Zion Suzuki, with formal steps to follow.
(Source: FabrizioRomano)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Cristian Romero is set to travel to Madrid ahead of his move to @Madrid_Atletico.
The deal is worth €40M, with Tottenham also securing a 15% sell-on clause on any future transfer.
@BarcelonaEn considered a move for Romero but ultimately decided against pursuing a deal under Hansi Flick.
(Source: FabrizioRomano)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
🚨 Everton are targeting Burnley right-back Kyle Walker as David Moyes looks to strengthen his squad.
The 36-year-old could leave Burnley for a nominal fee following their relegation from the Premier League.
Walker joined Burnley from @Manchester_City for £5M last summer and made 35 league starts last season.
(Source: TheSunFootball)
WHATSAPP CHANNEL 👉 HERE
❤19
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @live_transfer_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Transfers // NEWS” (@live_transfer_news), 17,438 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/live_transfer_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.