Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Chelsea FC ๐Ÿ”ต

@CFC_ChelseaFC

On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

136,991subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ€“316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001225748870
TypeChannel
Username@CFC_ChelseaFC
Descriptionโญ๏ธโญ๏ธ โ—๏ธGet all Chelsea news, interviews and more here!๐Ÿ”ต โ„น๏ธ Promos: ONLY @BlueBoy_97, @Chelsea_Source โ„น๏ธ Buy ads via website: https://telega.io/c/CFC_ChelseaFC โšฝ๏ธ Our soccer channel collection: @Soccer_Collection
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CFC_ChelseaFC

Topic

Sports โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

136,989137,048137,018.56 August 2026 โ€” 137,048 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 137,039 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 137,024 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 137,017 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 137,045 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 137,038 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 136,989 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 136,991 subscribers136,9916 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 136,980โ€“137,057 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:56136,991+2
11 Aug 2026, 16:27136,989-49
10 Aug 2026, 14:54137,038-7
9 Aug 2026, 12:02137,045+28
8 Aug 2026, 13:33137,017-7
7 Aug 2026, 10:20137,024-15
6 Aug 2026, 11:30137,039-9
6 Aug 2026, 09:01137,048first reading

Engagement

200 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
7.62%
avg views รท 136,991 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,400
198 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.48%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
200
of 200 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 196 of 198 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held200 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total2,067,207
Reactions total71,989
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ63,700
Videos
โ‰ˆ68
Links
โ‰ˆ6,440

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

64,570 reactions across 176 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค46,90072.6%
๐Ÿ‘3,9896.18%
๐Ÿคฃ3,5175.45%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3,2845.09%
๐Ÿ‘1,7592.72%
๐Ÿ‘Ž9261.43%
๐Ÿ–•6410.993%
๐Ÿฅฐ6030.934%
๐Ÿ˜5420.839%
๐Ÿ˜ญ4570.708%
๐Ÿ†4060.629%
๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚2370.367%
๐Ÿ’”1780.276%
๐Ÿซก1360.211%
๐Ÿฅฑ1140.177%
๐Ÿ™1100.17%
๐Ÿ’ฉ1010.156%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ910.141%
๐Ÿ˜ข910.141%
๐Ÿ’ฏ760.118%
27 further kinds4120.638%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 71,989reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 198 we hold a reading for ยท 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @CFC_ChelseaFC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 200 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTCโ‰ˆ2,070 views128 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

All have now joined full team trainingโ€ฆ โœ… #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค123๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿคฃ1

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTCโ‰ˆ7,410 views413 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Chelsea now have a 10% chance of winning the 2026/27 Premier League title. โœ… ๐Ÿ”— Polymarket #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค320๐Ÿ‘36๐Ÿคฃ27๐Ÿ”ฅ14๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿค”5๐Ÿ‘€2๐Ÿ‘Ž2

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTCโ‰ˆ8,230 views638 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Kyle Walker chooses the best fullback: Cucurella or Robertson?: ๐Ÿ—ฃ Robertson Robertson or Kounde? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Robertson Robertson or O'Reilly? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Robertson Robertson or Carvajal? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Timber? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Trent? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Mendes? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Reece James? ๐Ÿ—ฃ All round, Iโ€™d say Reece James Reece James or Hakimi? ๐Ÿ—ฃ Reece James #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค555๐Ÿ‘49๐Ÿ”ฅ33๐Ÿคฃ1

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTCโ‰ˆ8,320 views375 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

No full back made more carries into the opposition half than Pep Chavarrรญa in LaLiga last season (69). โšก๏ธ Untameable. ๐Ÿ”— Opta #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค336๐Ÿ‘22๐Ÿ‘€12โšก3๐Ÿคฃ2

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTCโ‰ˆ9,510 views363 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ ๐—•๐—ฅ๐—˜๐—”๐—ž๐—œ๐—ก๐—š: Chelsea have joined the race for AS Monaco's Lamine Camara, who is also the subject of interest from Crystal Palace, Nottingham Forest, Liverpool and Man United. ๐Ÿ”— Sรฉbastien Denis - Foot Mercato #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค204๐Ÿ–•108๐Ÿ˜29๐Ÿ‘Ž11๐Ÿคฃ7๐Ÿ˜ข4

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTCโ‰ˆ11,900 views319 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

โ€ผ๏ธ Chelsea are demanding โ‚ฌ5m for a dry loan of Axel Disasi. A sum deemed excessive by Crystal Palace. More discussions in the coming days. ๐Ÿ”— Santi Aouna - Foot Mercato #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค260๐Ÿ‘31๐Ÿ‘16๐Ÿ˜11๐Ÿคฃ1

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTCโ‰ˆ12,900 views452 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ Tosin is exploring a potential move away from Chelsea. Tosin was keen to remain in west London but he is open to exploring opportunities elsewhere. Acheampong and Colwill are regarded as untouchable, and Wesley Fofana is expected to stay. Mamadou Sarr and Aaron Anselmino could leave on loan. ๐Ÿ”— Nizaar Kinsella - BBC Sport #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค363๐Ÿ™41๐Ÿ”ฅ25๐Ÿค8๐Ÿ˜ญ6๐Ÿคฃ5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘2

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTCโ‰ˆ13,500 views381 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

โ€ผ๏ธ Manchester Cityโ€™s move for Enzo Fernandez is confirmed. Rodriโ€™s potential departure for Barcelona will prompt the Citizens to re-engage with Chelsea to explore the figures involved in a possible deal. Maresca is a major advocate for Enzo Fernรกndez. ๐Ÿ”— Gianluigi Longari - Sportitalia #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

๐Ÿ‘261โค63๐Ÿ‘Ž27๐Ÿฅฑ14๐Ÿคฃ8๐Ÿ–•4๐Ÿ™4

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTCโ‰ˆ13,300 views361 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ No indication yet of Chelseaโ€™s valuation for Tosin, but he has interest from a number of PL clubs and Benfica. ๐Ÿ”— Kieran Gill - Daily Mail โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–โž–โž– Chelsea have received interest from Benfica for Tosin Adarabioyo. It would reunite him with former Fulham manager Marco Silva. There is also interest from at least one other Premier League club. He has less than two years left on his contract. ๐Ÿ”— Nizaar Kinsella - BBโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘263โค86๐Ÿ–•9๐Ÿคฃ3

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTCโ‰ˆ12,700 views639 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ Tosin is drawing interest from Benfica and a number of PL clubs. ๐Ÿ”— Ben Jacobs - talkSPORT #CFC | #Chelsea ๐Ÿ“ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC

โค457๐Ÿ‘84๐Ÿ™64๐ŸŽ‰11๐Ÿคฃ11๐Ÿ‘5๐Ÿ”ฅ5โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2

Signed ๐™ช๐™ฃ๐™จ๐™ฉ๐™ค๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™–๐™—๐™ก๐™š ๐™๐™ซ

12 Aug 2026, 12:57 UTCโ‰ˆ12,900 views410 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ—ฃJohn Terry on Xabi Alonso: "I met him very recently at the training ground and got a great feeling from him." "Just having conversations with the boys as well โ€“ I know itโ€™s early days โ€“ but the boys are speaking really positive of him and the sessions that heโ€™s doing." "Welbeck is a great signing for me. Jordan Henderson is still a top player, still got so much to give and will help and guide these players." "Weโ€ฆ

โค363๐Ÿ‘41๐Ÿ‘3๐Ÿคฃ2๐Ÿ‘Ž1

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

12 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTCโ‰ˆ13,100 views326 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’ฐ Chelsea believe the market for wide forwards has been inflated by a lack of options for leading clubs, highlighted by the ยฃ117m fee paid for Rogers and PSG's ยฃ145m Barcola valuation. Those figures have influenced Chelsea's valuation of Pedro Neto. Maresca and Neto are understood to have a strong relationship, and the winger is among those reported to have been frustrated by the Italian's departure midway through โ€ฆ

โค271๐Ÿ‘43๐Ÿ‘Ž5๐Ÿคฃ4๐Ÿ˜3

Signed ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’–๐’† ๐‘ฉ๐’๐’š ๐Ÿ”ต

Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @CFC_ChelseaFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 21:20 UTCFinal Results4,020 voters approx.

Best player against AC Milan? ๐Ÿค” #CFC | #CHEACM

  1. Joao Pedro28%
  2. Palestra42%
  3. Caicedo21%
  4. Lavia9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 86,568 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Chelsea Fc Fan
@chelsea_prideoflondon ยท 196,848
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 80 here โ€” alongside 79 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_sports_football_updates ยท 258,577
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here โ€” alongside 90 others โ€” read 10 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG ยท 379,249
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here โ€” alongside 94 others โ€” read 10 August 2026
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee ยท 151,843
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 92 here โ€” alongside 91 others โ€” read 12 August 2026
แŠขแ‰ตแ‹ฎ แ‰ผแˆแˆฒ ๐™ต๐™ฐ๐™ฝ๐š‚ แ‰ แŠขแ‰ตแ‹ฎแŒตแ‹ซ โ„ข
@ETHIO_CHELSEA ยท 211,021
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 75 here โ€” alongside 74 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG ยท 240,966
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here โ€” alongside 89 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
WASSCE DITTO DITTO
@wassce_bece_dittoditto ยท 182,621
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 55 here โ€” alongside 54 others โ€” read 12 August 2026
ETHIO CHELSEA FANSโ„ข
@ET_CHELSEA_FANS ยท 193,577
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here โ€” alongside 67 others โ€” read 11 August 2026
Enokay69 Prediction Hub ๐Ÿฅ‚๐ŸŽ‰
@enokayPredictions ยท 179,262
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 73 here โ€” alongside 72 others โ€” read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œChelsea FC ๐Ÿ”ตโ€ (@CFC_ChelseaFC), 136,991 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CFC_ChelseaFC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.