All have now joined full team trainingโฆ โ #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค123๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2๐คฃ1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต

Channel
@CFC_ChelseaFC
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
136,991subscribers
-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 100,000โ316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001225748870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CFC_ChelseaFC |
| Description | โญ๏ธโญ๏ธ โ๏ธGet all Chelsea news, interviews and more here!๐ต โน๏ธ Promos: ONLY @BlueBoy_97, @Chelsea_Source โน๏ธ Buy ads via website: https://telega.io/c/CFC_ChelseaFC โฝ๏ธ Our soccer channel collection: @Soccer_Collection |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 30 June 2021โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CFC_ChelseaFC |
Sports โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 136,991 | +2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 136,989 | -49 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 137,038 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 137,045 | +28 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 137,017 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:20 | 137,024 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:30 | 137,039 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:01 | 137,048 | first reading |
200 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 196 of 198 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (5 August 2026 โ 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,067,207 |
| Reactions total | 71,989 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
64,570 reactions across 176 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 46,900 | 72.6% | |
| ๐ | 3,989 | 6.18% | |
| ๐คฃ | 3,517 | 5.45% | |
| ๐ฅ | 3,284 | 5.09% | |
| ๐ | 1,759 | 2.72% | |
| ๐ | 926 | 1.43% | |
| ๐ | 641 | 0.993% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 603 | 0.934% | |
| ๐ | 542 | 0.839% | |
| ๐ญ | 457 | 0.708% | |
| ๐ | 406 | 0.629% | |
| ๐คทโโ | 237 | 0.367% | |
| ๐ | 178 | 0.276% | |
| ๐ซก | 136 | 0.211% | |
| ๐ฅฑ | 114 | 0.177% | |
| ๐ | 110 | 0.17% | |
| ๐ฉ | 101 | 0.156% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 91 | 0.141% | |
| ๐ข | 91 | 0.141% | |
| ๐ฏ | 76 | 0.118% | |
| 27 further kinds | 412 | 0.638% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 196 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 71,989reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @CFC_ChelseaFC. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 200 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
All have now joined full team trainingโฆ โ #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค123๐ฅ2๐ฅฐ2๐คฃ1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
Chelsea now have a 10% chance of winning the 2026/27 Premier League title. โ ๐ Polymarket #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค320๐36๐คฃ27๐ฅ14๐5๐ค5๐2๐2
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
Kyle Walker chooses the best fullback: Cucurella or Robertson?: ๐ฃ Robertson Robertson or Kounde? ๐ฃ Robertson Robertson or O'Reilly? ๐ฃ Robertson Robertson or Carvajal? ๐ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Timber? ๐ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Trent? ๐ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Mendes? ๐ฃ Carvajal Carvajal or Reece James? ๐ฃ All round, Iโd say Reece James Reece James or Hakimi? ๐ฃ Reece James #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค555๐49๐ฅ33๐คฃ1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
No full back made more carries into the opposition half than Pep Chavarrรญa in LaLiga last season (69). โก๏ธ Untameable. ๐ Opta #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค336๐22๐12โก3๐คฃ2
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
๐จ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐: Chelsea have joined the race for AS Monaco's Lamine Camara, who is also the subject of interest from Crystal Palace, Nottingham Forest, Liverpool and Man United. ๐ Sรฉbastien Denis - Foot Mercato #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค204๐108๐29๐11๐คฃ7๐ข4
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
โผ๏ธ Chelsea are demanding โฌ5m for a dry loan of Axel Disasi. A sum deemed excessive by Crystal Palace. More discussions in the coming days. ๐ Santi Aouna - Foot Mercato #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค260๐31๐16๐11๐คฃ1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
๐จ Tosin is exploring a potential move away from Chelsea. Tosin was keen to remain in west London but he is open to exploring opportunities elsewhere. Acheampong and Colwill are regarded as untouchable, and Wesley Fofana is expected to stay. Mamadou Sarr and Aaron Anselmino could leave on loan. ๐ Nizaar Kinsella - BBC Sport #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค363๐41๐ฅ25๐ค8๐ญ6๐คฃ5โคโ๐ฅ2๐2
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
โผ๏ธ Manchester Cityโs move for Enzo Fernandez is confirmed. Rodriโs potential departure for Barcelona will prompt the Citizens to re-engage with Chelsea to explore the figures involved in a possible deal. Maresca is a major advocate for Enzo Fernรกndez. ๐ Gianluigi Longari - Sportitalia #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
๐261โค63๐27๐ฅฑ14๐คฃ8๐4๐4
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
๐จ No indication yet of Chelseaโs valuation for Tosin, but he has interest from a number of PL clubs and Benfica. ๐ Kieran Gill - Daily Mail โโโโโโโโโ Chelsea have received interest from Benfica for Tosin Adarabioyo. It would reunite him with former Fulham manager Marco Silva. There is also interest from at least one other Premier League club. He has less than two years left on his contract. ๐ Nizaar Kinsella - BBโฆ
๐263โค86๐9๐คฃ3
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
๐จ Tosin is drawing interest from Benfica and a number of PL clubs. ๐ Ben Jacobs - talkSPORT #CFC | #Chelsea ๐ฒ @CFC_ChelseaFC
โค457๐84๐64๐11๐คฃ11๐5๐ฅ5โคโ๐ฅ2
Signed ๐ช๐ฃ๐จ๐ฉ๐ค๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ก๐ ๐๐ซ
๐ฃJohn Terry on Xabi Alonso: "I met him very recently at the training ground and got a great feeling from him." "Just having conversations with the boys as well โ I know itโs early days โ but the boys are speaking really positive of him and the sessions that heโs doing." "Welbeck is a great signing for me. Jordan Henderson is still a top player, still got so much to give and will help and guide these players." "Weโฆ
โค363๐41๐3๐คฃ2๐1
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
๐จ๐ฐ Chelsea believe the market for wide forwards has been inflated by a lack of options for leading clubs, highlighted by the ยฃ117m fee paid for Rogers and PSG's ยฃ145m Barcola valuation. Those figures have influenced Chelsea's valuation of Pedro Neto. Maresca and Neto are understood to have a strong relationship, and the winger is among those reported to have been frustrated by the Italian's departure midway through โฆ
โค271๐43๐5๐คฃ4๐3
Signed ๐ฉ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ต
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @CFC_ChelseaFC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Best player against AC Milan? ๐ค #CFC | #CHEACM
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 86,568 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 11 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โChelsea FC ๐ตโ (@CFC_ChelseaFC), 136,991 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CFC_ChelseaFC.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.