Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CHELSEA NEWS 🗞️ 🔵

@Chelsea_fc_worldwide

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

95,010subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354726102
TypeChannel
Username@Chelsea_fc_worldwide
Description✅The most informative Chelsea channel 🎙️Live coverage of Chelsea games ❌Content mostly from X 🔝Join: @ChelseaLiveGoals Admin: @realbaddman
Created1 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Chelsea_fc_worldwide

Growth

94,99895,07595,036.56 August 2026 — 95,049 subscribers6 August 2026 — 95,054 subscribers7 August 2026 — 95,024 subscribers8 August 2026 — 95,075 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95,057 subscribers10 August 2026 — 95,028 subscribers11 August 2026 — 95,008 subscribers12 August 2026 — 94,998 subscribers14 August 2026 — 95,010 subscribers95,0106 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94,986–95,087 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:4295,010+12
12 Aug 2026, 19:0494,998-10
11 Aug 2026, 21:5595,008-20
10 Aug 2026, 20:1795,028-29
9 Aug 2026, 20:3195,057-18
8 Aug 2026, 23:0095,075+51
7 Aug 2026, 19:2095,024-30
6 Aug 2026, 20:4295,054+5
6 Aug 2026, 05:3695,049first reading

Engagement

231 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.59%
avg views ÷ 95,010 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,160
231 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
231
of 231 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 230 of 231 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held231 (5 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total1,885,238
Reactions total46,271
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
56,600
Videos
681
Links
7,940

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

42,845 reactions across 213 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31,52573.6%
🔥3,0197.05%
🤣1,6303.80%
👍1,2032.81%
👎1,0972.56%
🥰7691.79%
😁5421.27%
💔4631.08%
🎉2780.649%
👏2550.595%
😭2240.523%
🙏2060.481%
🌚1920.448%
😡1600.373%
🤡1430.334%
💩1280.299%
💯1100.257%
🤝1070.25%
❤‍🔥1010.236%
🕊970.226%
34 further kinds5961.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 230 of the 231 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46,271reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 231 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 231 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Chelsea_fc_worldwide. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 231 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC≈2,630 views66 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

CONFIRMED: Dastan Satpayev has officially joined from FC Kairat, who will now move to Burnley on loan for the upcoming season.

66

Signed 🥷🏿 𝕭𝖆𝖉𝖉Butler

14 Aug 2026, 19:05 UTC≈4,450 views74 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨Fabrizio Romano says he cannot predict what happens if Man City try and arrive with a big proposal to tempt Chelsea.

67🤬7

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈4,600 views91 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨BREAKING: Man City remain in contact with Enzo’s camp. Man City spoke to the agents yesterday and TODAY. Man City remain in active conversations. The deadline was kind of a VERBAL RELEASE CLAUSE [Via Fabrizio Romano]

79👎12

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC≈6,900 views264 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🚨🇰🇿 Dastan Satpayev to Burnley on loan, here we go! Loan deal agreed for the talent from Kazakhstan to join from Chelsea. Burnley wanted Satpaev after Alleyne and Chelsea gave green light tonight; no buy option clause, back to Chelsea in June 2027. Agreement in place, as per BBC. [via Fabrizio Romano]

🥰18076👎6🤣2

Signed 🥷🏿 𝕭𝖆𝖉𝖉Butler

14 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈7,560 views178 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨Exclusive: Dastan Satpayev is set to join Burnley on a season-long loan. He signed a six year deal with an option for a further season at Chelsea on his 18th birthday after completing his move from Kazakhstan.

165👏12🤣1

Signed 𝓔𝓴𝓸𝔀 🪙

14 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈7,420 views99 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Chelsea’s position is the £120m offer to sign Enzo Fernandez is off the table but it remains to be seen whether #MCFC still bid, and offer different terms. Interest remains. City sources point to Chelsea’s own pursuit of Fernandez in February 2023, which went down to the final minutes of the window and had previous points where Benfica said publicly the Argentine midfielder was not for sale. Chelsea expect Fernande

93🤣6

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC≈7,140 views185 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨Mudryk on time away: "I'd say it was like a pre-season for 18 months. So I've been training, I've been training hard. I didn't give up and I just tried to work as hard as I could." 🚨Mudryk: "I really love my fans and I always appreciate them. And I would like to play and try to bring them joy."

168🤣15🤗2

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC≈8,420 views217 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨 Manchester City now have to decide if they want to try and bid for Enzo Fernandez, but this time on different conditions, not £120m. [Via Fabrizio Romano]

180🤣33😁4

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈8,640 views187 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🚨🔵 Chelsea have not received any official bid for Enzo Fernández — as their own 5pm UK time ‘deadline’ has now passed. #CFC inform £120m verbal ‘exit clause’ made available to Enzo’s camp for potential suitors at end of May is now off the table. [via Fabrizio Romano]

170🤩9🤝8

Signed 🥷🏿 𝕭𝖆𝖉𝖉Butler

14 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈8,140 views129 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Chelsea's 5pm deadline for written bids for Enzo Fernandez has passed with Chelsea not receiving any offers. The club now expect Enzo to be a Chelsea player for the 2026/27 season. It remains to be seen whether their resolve will be tested before the official transfer deadline. [Via Matt Law]

119👍10

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈7,770 views186 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨 BREAKING: Chelsea's 17:00 Friday deadline for an Enzo Fernandez bid has now passed. No written offer from Manchester City or any club has arrived. The £120m exit conditions are now off the table. They were verbally made available to Fernandez's representatives in May to pitch to potential suitors. It remains to be seen whether Manchester City still try to make an offer post-deadline. But Chelsea now expect Ferna

168🤝14👎3👍1

Signed 🎲 𝔅𝔦𝔤 𝔅𝔢𝔫𝔰𝔞🖤

14 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈7,070 views100 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

927👍1

Signed 🥷🏿 𝕭𝖆𝖉𝖉Butler

Showing the 12 most recent of 231 posts we hold for @Chelsea_fc_worldwide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Chelsea_fc_worldwide edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTCAnonymous Poll2,990 voters approx.

£102m on the table for Enzo Fernandez according to Cesar Luis Merlo Do you TAKE IT or LEAVE IT.

  1. TAKE16%
  2. HOLD OUT FOR £120m56%
  3. REJECT ALL OFFERS32%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 231 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,310,323 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Chelsea FC 🔵
@CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,026
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
⚽️ Chelsea Football Club 💙
@ChelseaFcWorldWide_001 · 119,886
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Sky Sports Football
@Sky_sports_football_updates · 258,553
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
Manchester United⚽💯
@Manchester_Utdfc · 126,949
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Chelsea Fc Fan
@chelsea_prideoflondon · 196,734
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 August 2026
Wallpapers Arena™🦹🏽‍♀️❤️
@wallpapersarena · 113,458
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 August 2026
FC BARCELONA
@barcelonaen · 116,178
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Official Fabrizio Romano
@FabrizioRomanoTG · 379,658
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 113,557
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
REAL MADRID C.F.
@Realmadrid_world · 117,815
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Premier League
@premier · 131,264
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Manchester City FC
@manchester_city · 128,906
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
🇬🇧 Manchester United 🇬🇧
@manchester · 109,732
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Ghana Memes 😂❤️🇬🇭
@ghanamemes · 129,028
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 13 August 2026
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 142,947
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
ኢትዮ ቼልሲ 𝙵𝙰𝙽𝚂 በኢትዮጵያ ™
@ETHIO_CHELSEA · 211,351
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 11 August 2026
VETLAND SPORTS
@vetland_sports_football1 · 110,570
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
English Premier League Update
@Premier_League_Update · 117,511
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Troll Football
@Troll_Football_Telegram · 142,538
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 151,659
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
ዜና ቼልሲ™
@EthioZena_Chelsea · 122,756
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Premier League News
@Premier_League_News_TG · 240,916
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
ETHIO CHELSEA FANS™
@ET_CHELSEA_FANS · 193,433
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 11 August 2026
Enokay69 Prediction Hub 🥂🎉
@enokayPredictions · 178,866
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CHELSEA NEWS 🗞️ 🔵” (@Chelsea_fc_worldwide), 95,010 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chelsea_fc_worldwide.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.