Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

LEO ARMY

@leo_army

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

14,121subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001460776363
TypeChannel
Username@leo_army
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/leo_army

Growth

14,12114,19014,155.56 August 2026 — 14,190 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,190 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,184 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,169 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,161 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,146 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,134 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,121 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,111–14,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:4514,121-13
11 Aug 2026, 23:4214,134-12
11 Aug 2026, 01:2214,146-8
10 Aug 2026, 03:0114,154-7
8 Aug 2026, 23:5114,161-8
8 Aug 2026, 01:4014,169-15
6 Aug 2026, 23:4314,184-6
6 Aug 2026, 02:2214,190no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:3714,190first reading

Engagement

83 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.80%
avg views ÷ 14,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
83 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
83
of 83 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 80 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held83 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total91,451
Reactions total4,519
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,727 reactions across 65 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,66771.6%
💔43311.6%
🔥2697.22%
😢782.09%
👍671.80%
😁511.37%
😭481.29%
🕊290.778%
🤣240.644%
🫡170.456%
🤔120.322%
😱100.268%
🤯90.241%
🤮70.188%
🙈30.08%
👏10.027%
😐10.027%
🙏10.027%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,519reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC234 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

He was his biggest fan and supporter 💔

19💔4

12 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC622 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Will Inter Miami reach to leagues cup knockout stages ?

  1. Yes77%
  2. No23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC685 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐌𝐢𝐚𝐦𝐢 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐢𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐝𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐨𝐟 𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐠𝐮𝐞𝐬 𝐂𝐮𝐩. After reaching the final in their first two appearances, they could now fail to even clear the group stage. Without Messi, can the Herons turn things around? 📊 Polymarket gives them just a 50% chance of winning. 👀

😱92

12 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC719 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Messi is a system player Messi cannot do it without Iniesta or Di Maria Messi has done the impossible with Miami

52

12 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC756 views36 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Leo’s plane has landed safely in Miami! ✈️ Leo will go to the stadium tonight to support the team and will join trainings soon 🏃‍♂️.

36

12 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC809 views39 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

📲 Leo’s story: From the bottom of my heart, I want to thank all of you for the love, respect, and great care you have shown me and my family during this painful time after the passing of my father.Thank you for standing by our side, for every single message and the affection you showed, and above all, for respecting our pain and our privacy.

💔308😢1

12 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC825 views52 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Definitely, the only way Leo can ease this pain is by playing football ⚽️. We should be happy he decided to return sooner and take part in the matches

52

12 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC805 views49 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Ronaldo’s comment for Leo:Leo, in these difficult times, I deeply embrace you and your family. Stay strong.

48👏1

12 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC848 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I’m going to miss you so much, but you will always be present — especially in the way I raise my children, because I’ll raise them the same way you and Mom raised me.Rest in peace, Dad. Watch over us from up there, just like you did when you were by our side. Thank you for everything.I love you, Dad ❤️

💔525😢1

12 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC857 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026

You were by my side from the very beginning, and only a little bit of the journey was left. Why couldn’t you hold on a little longer so we could finish it together?I know your happiness was in seeing your family in a good place, seeing your wife and your children, and above all, watching me play without anyone else knowing…Ever since I was a kid it was always like that. Whenever you came home from work you took me to

💔363😢1

12 Aug 2026, 14:13 UTC793 views41 reactionsread 13 August 2026

We made it to the final, but you couldn’t come.I wanted to become champion for you and bring the trophy home to show it to you. I couldn’t. My legs no longer had the strength to keep going. This time I tried to push my body to the limit, but I couldn’t. I didn’t feel good the whole time.When I got home, you thought we had lost the final on penalties. We didn’t even get the chance to talk about any of what happened in

💔391😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @leo_army. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTCAnonymous Poll151 voters

Will Inter Miami reach to leagues cup knockout stages ?

  1. Yes77%
  2. No23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTCAnonymous Poll397 voters

Rate the performance of Lionel Messi in PSG out of 5

  1. 552%
  2. 430%
  3. 312%
  4. 22%
  5. 12%
  6. 02%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTCAnonymous Poll499 voters

In which club Messi had the most maturity in his game?

  1. Barcelona80%
  2. PSG3%
  3. Inter Miami ( so far)17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTCAnonymous Poll301 voters

Was the 2011/2012 the best season of the Lionel Messi ?

  1. Yes81%
  2. No19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Poll335 voters

Will Messi win MLS with Inter Miami this season ?

  1. Yes92%
  2. No8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 24,194 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LEO ARMY” (@leo_army), 14,121 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leo_army.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.