Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Borussia Dortmund

Channel

Borussia Dortmund

@borussia_dortmund

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,141subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001623386593
TypeChannel
Username@borussia_dortmund
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/borussia_dortmund

Growth

11,13511,15411,144.56 August 2026 — 11,144 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,139 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,135 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,136 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,150 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,153 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers11,1416 August 202617 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 11 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,132–11,157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:0711,141-12
16 Aug 2026, 07:2611,153+3
13 Aug 2026, 06:5511,150-1
12 Aug 2026, 04:2711,151-3
11 Aug 2026, 05:4511,154+18
10 Aug 2026, 07:5111,136+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:1111,135-4
8 Aug 2026, 05:3711,139-4
7 Aug 2026, 03:5811,143-1
6 Aug 2026, 06:0111,144first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.90%
avg views ÷ 11,141 subscribers
Avg views / post
657
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.787%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 54 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held68 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total44,676
Reactions total284
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 53 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22680.4%
😁196.76%
👍186.41%
🥰62.14%
👎41.42%
🔥41.42%
👀10.356%
😢10.356%
🤣10.356%
🥱10.356%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC510 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Apparently, if your last name is Yamamoto, you're really good at sports. ⚽️⚾️🇯🇵 @Borussia_dortmund

2

14 Aug 2026, 21:37 UTC481 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

See you soon, Donny! 🇳🇱👋 @Borussia_dortmund

4

14 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC490 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Back at the best stadium in the world. 🔜🏡💛 @Borussia_dortmund

3

13 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC655 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Borussia Dortmund have concrete interest in the Spanish right-back Hector Fort. @Borussia_dortmund

2

13 Aug 2026, 21:50 UTC685 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 On Saturday, the season opener is coming up – and we're thrilled to announce: SOLD OUT! 🤩 We're looking forward to finally welcoming you back to the most beautiful stadium in the world and kicking off the new season together with you! 🔔 And for everyone who's already in action earlier: At 1 PM, the BVB women will face off against the Italian double winners AS Roma. Tickets are still available for this – grab them

4

13 Aug 2026, 21:10 UTC606 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

has officially sent Köln a package of over €55m for Said El Mala Base fee is under €50m, Köln deliberating @Borussia_dortmund

13 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC654 viewsread 15 August 2026

Diant Ramaj joins Copenhagen on a one-year loan with buy option worth 5 million euros. @Borussia_dortmund

13 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC655 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Warrior. 🇬🇷⚔️🖤 @Borussia_dortmund

🔥42

12 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC768 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Borussia Dortmund and NEC Nijmegen are in advanced talks regarding a loan deal for Almugera Kabar. @Borussia_dortmund

👀1

12 Aug 2026, 21:15 UTC808 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Mood bc we're back home this weekend. 😄🏡📸 @Borussia_dortmund

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @borussia_dortmund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Rate our summer signing ✍️ so far ?

  1. 13%
  2. 2-36%
  3. 4-655%
  4. 710%
  5. 813%
  6. 9-1013%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 200,334 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

MANCHESTER UNITED 🔴
@manchesterunited · 94,277
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
FC BARCELONA
@barcelonaen · 116,375
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
Manchester United - Sun Sport
@ManchesterUnitedSunSport · 97,900
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Real Madrid C.F.
@real_madrid · 113,439
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Manchester City FC
@manchester_city · 129,029
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Arsenal
@arsenal_london · 143,260
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 August 2026
UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE
@uefa_champion_leaguee · 151,368
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 August 2026
REAL MADRID C.F.
@Realmadrid_world · 117,729
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Borussia Dortmund” (@borussia_dortmund), 11,141 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/borussia_dortmund.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.