Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for LAMINE YAMAL

Channel

LAMINE YAMAL

@Lamine_Yamal_Official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,451subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002073931505
TypeChannel
Username@Lamine_Yamal_Official
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Lamine_Yamal_Official

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,43210,58410,5086 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,584 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,576 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,562 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,563 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,558 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,540 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,541 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,525 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,506 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,501 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,495 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,489 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,487 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,466 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,444 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,432 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,504 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,498 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,481 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,487 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,495 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,482 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,468 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,469 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,472 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,464 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,456 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,451 subscribers10,4516 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,409–10,607 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:5610,451-5
16 Sept 2026, 07:5710,456-8
14 Sept 2026, 11:5810,464-8
12 Sept 2026, 20:3710,472+3
10 Sept 2026, 19:4010,469+1
7 Sept 2026, 17:1910,468-14
4 Sept 2026, 17:4110,482-13
3 Sept 2026, 00:1710,495+8
1 Sept 2026, 18:3810,487+6
30 Aug 2026, 18:2510,481-17
28 Aug 2026, 20:2310,498-6
27 Aug 2026, 18:5310,504+8
26 Aug 2026, 16:5710,496+64
25 Aug 2026, 16:0310,432-12
24 Aug 2026, 18:2310,444-22
23 Aug 2026, 02:2610,466-21
21 Aug 2026, 15:0810,487-2
20 Aug 2026, 13:3810,489-6
19 Aug 2026, 12:5210,495-6
18 Aug 2026, 10:5310,501first reading

Engagement

197 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 10,451 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 197 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held197 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total58,220
Reactions total2,825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,148 reactions across 183 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,70773.8%
🔥1,71113.0%
👍3402.59%
🤣3052.32%
😁2041.55%
🙏1401.06%
🤔1401.06%
💔1150.875%
👏890.677%
🤩810.616%
🤯730.555%
💯630.479%
😨590.449%
😭290.221%
❤‍🔥160.122%
🙈160.122%
🥱150.114%
🥴150.114%
😱90.068%
60.046%
5 further kinds150.114%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 190 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,567 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC≈1,110 views93 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📸 | Lamine Yamal & Anthony Gordon 🤩🩶

92😍1

28 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,190 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎙️| Edin Terzić: "Lamine Yamal has been exceptional over the past few weeks. He takes a step back and gets three weeks of rest and after that, we expect him to return immediately and be ready to score 5 goals every week. He can do that starting tomorrow, but not against us."

48

28 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,190 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨📲 | Inés García (Lamine Yamal’s girlfriend) via IG:

51🥱8👍2

28 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC≈1,200 views74 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📸 | Yesterday, Lamine Yamal and Joan García received the La Liga Fantasy trophies for Best Forward and Best Goalkeeper of last season. 🤩🏆

74

28 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,160 views52 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🚨🎙️| Edin Terzić: "Does Lamine deserve all the criticism he’s been receiving lately? Don’t forget that we’re first and foremost talking about a human being, in this case, we’re also talking about a very young player. We need to be a little more cautious about our criticisms."

38👍8👏6

28 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈1,190 views74 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎥 | Fermín López & Lamine Yamal 🫂❤️

74

28 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,260 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎥 | Lamine Yamal & Nico Williams 😂❤️

🔥6020

28 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈1,250 views88 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎥 | Lamine Yamal & Pedri 🫂❤️

49🤯39

28 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC≈1,320 views86 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📸 | Lamine Yamal and Unai Simón after the match against Athletic Club. 🫂❤️

86

28 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC≈1,360 views55 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎙️| Hansi Flick: "I think it was good for Lamine Yamal to play 90 minutes, because under these conditions we also continue to improve the physical aspect. That was the idea today. And of course, you could see at the end that all the players were very tired, but that’s normal."

55

28 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈1,450 views59 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🚨🎙️| Rodri: "Lamine Yamal is incredible. He went through a period where he might have felt a bit frustrated. We tried to lift his spirits, and today we saw the best version of Lamine. Even though he couldn’t score, I’m happy because this is what we expect from him."

59

28 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,480 views80 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

📊| Lamine Yamal vs Athletic Club: - 85 touches - 45 passes - 7 shots (Most) - 5 chances created (Most) - 1 big chance missed - 10 touches in opposition box (Most) - 3 successful dribbles - 7 key passes - 2 accurate crosses - 3 dispossessed - 1 recovery - 4 duels won

80

Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @Lamine_Yamal_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Aug 2026, 19:59 UTCAnonymous Poll512 voters

Do you think Yamal deserves the 2026 Ballon d’Or ?

  1. Yes83%
  2. No17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTCAnonymous Poll461 voters

Rate Lamine Yamal and Raphinha duo out of 5

  1. 566%
  2. 420%
  3. 35%
  4. 23%
  5. 16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTCAnonymous Poll398 voters

Should Barca sign a striker or you prefer Yamal to play false 9?

  1. New striker81%
  2. Yamal as false-921%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 21:01 UTCAnonymous Poll444 voters

Do you think Yamal got a fair rating in FC27?

  1. Yes82%
  2. No18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTCAnonymous Poll289 voters

Can Yamal score 30 goals this season for club and country ?

  1. Yes87%
  2. No13%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTCAnonymous Poll476 voters

Do you find the Barca squad capable of winning the CL in 2026/27 season?

  1. Yes81%
  2. No19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UEFA CHAMPIONS LEAGUE 🇪🇺
@championsleaguegoall · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
UEFA Champions League
@UEFA_Champions_League_Worldwide · 39,683
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 September 2026
𝐒𝐩𝐨𝐫𝐭𝐬𝐒𝐜𝐨𝐩𝐞
@SportsScope · 100,354
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026
THE CAP LORD🥇⚽🏀
@thelordpun · 56,430
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 22 August 2026
FC BARCELONA™️
@Barcelona_worldwide · 32,855
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Real Madrid C.F.™
@real_madrid_en · 24,854
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
Premier League🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
@mybestpremierleague · 24,990
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 15 September 2026
Sky Sports Football™
@skysportsfootballupdates · 29,457
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“LAMINE YAMAL” (@Lamine_Yamal_Official), 10,451 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lamine_Yamal_Official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.