Ruben Dias starts for Portugal vs Denmark in their Nations League match. 🇵🇹
❤40👍5😁1😱1
Signed Precious

Channel
@mancity247
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,800subscribers
-893 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315198277 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mancity247 |
| Description | ✔️Welcome to Mancity channel ▶️we are loud,proud&loyal ManCity Fans ▶️We provide transfer rumors,news and match results from different reliable sources every day Ads @jaybet |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 64 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mancity247 |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @manchester_city/426873 Sept 2026, 18:35 UTC | @mancity247/72740 · this entry3 Sept 2026, 18:56 UTC | 1.00 | 22 minutes |
| @mancity247/73067 · this entry10 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC | @manchester_city/4279510 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC | 1.00 | 27 minutes |
| @mancity247/73161 · this entry13 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC | @manchester_city/4283013 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC | 1.00 | 67 minutes |
| @mancity247/74532 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC | @manchester_city/4349227 Oct 2026, 11:15 UTC | 1.00 | 38 minutes |
| @mancity247/74529 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 10:33 UTC | @manchester_city/4349427 Oct 2026, 11:21 UTC | 1.00 | 47 minutes |
| @mancity247/74535 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 10:38 UTC | @manchester_city/4349527 Oct 2026, 11:25 UTC | 1.00 | 47 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @manchester_city | 23 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 58 minutes | this entry (18–5) |
| @XtraCity | 14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | this entry (12–2) |
| @manchester_city_fc_news | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 83 minutes | @manchester_city_fc_news (6–4) |
| @mancitymedia | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.97 | 5.0 hours | this entry (8–0) |
| @FOOTBALL_PUNDITS_TV | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 67 minutes | this entry (6–0) |
| @ManchesterCity_Ethiopia | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 3 minutes | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 13 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 870 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 44,800 | -74 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 18:06 | 44,874 | -20 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 21:07 | 44,894 | -53 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:45 | 44,947 | -50 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:09 | 44,997 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 45,011 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:47 | 45,017 | +2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:25 | 45,015 | -30 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:57 | 45,045 | -15 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 06:51 | 45,060 | -25 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 45,085 | -32 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:41 | 45,117 | -33 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:37 | 45,150 | -54 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:49 | 45,204 | -45 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:09 | 45,249 | -29 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 45,278 | -37 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:29 | 45,315 | -11 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:35 | 45,326 | -44 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 45,370 | -17 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 45,387 | first reading |
1,832 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 207 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,832 (6 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,219,962 |
| Reactions total | 31,930 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 00:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
100,241 reactions across 996 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59,038 | 58.9% | |
| 🔥 | 17,732 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 8,660 | 8.64% | |
| 😁 | 8,064 | 8.04% | |
| 😢 | 2,764 | 2.76% | |
| 😭 | 1,937 | 1.93% | |
| 🙏 | 1,092 | 1.09% | |
| 🎉 | 504 | 0.503% | |
| 😱 | 280 | 0.279% | |
| 🙊 | 170 | 0.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 996 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100,241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 September 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mancity247. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 September 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 385 posts held from the last 30 days (1.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ruben Dias starts for Portugal vs Denmark in their Nations League match. 🇵🇹
❤40👍5😁1😱1
Signed Precious
Erling Haaland vs. Wales: 1 Goal 1 Assist 19 Touches 9 Accurate Passes 7 Touches In Opposition Box 2 Shots On Target 2 Aerial Duels Won 2 Chances Created 2 Passes Into Final Third 1 Tackle 1 Recovery 1 Ground Duel Won 1 Accurate Long Ball 1 Big Chance Created
🔥60❤17👍2
Signed Precious
1 goal, 1 assist and 90 minutes for Erling Haaland against Wales in the UEFA Nations League. 🇳🇴
🔥39❤7👍2
Signed Precious
GOAL! Erling Haaland scores for Norway. 🇳🇴 3-1.
🔥50❤8🎉4👍1
Signed Precious
ASSIST! Erling Haaland sets up Norway’s second goal. 🇳🇴 2-0.
🔥58❤9🎉3👍1
Signed Precious
Ayyoub Bouaddi vs. Niger: 1 Assist 90 Touches 77 Accurate Passes 96% Pass Accuracy 6 Recoveries 5 Passes Into Final Third 4 Ground Duels Won 4 Chances Created (Most) 3 Was Fouled 1 Block 1 Interception 1 Aerial Duel Won 1 Accurate Long Ball 1 Successful Dribble
❤124🔥19👍1
Signed Precious
Happy 23rd Birthday, Micah Hamilton! 🎉🩵
❤107🎉18👍5
Signed Precious
Lauren Hemp is the Barclays WSL Player of the Month for October. 🤩 What a player!
🔥80❤14
Signed Precious
90 minutes for Man City’s three representatives in England 2-1 Croatia tonight. ✅ 90 minutes for Donnarumma, 82 minutes for Cherki in Italy 3-1 France. ✅
❤61
Signed Precious
Iliman Ndiaye vs Sudan: 1 Assist 66 Touches 34 Accurate Passes 92% Pass Accuracy 9 Ground Duels Won 7 Recoveries 5 Successful Dribbles (Most) 5 Touches In Opposition Box 3 Tackles 3 Passes Into Final Third 2 Chances Created 1 Hit Woodwork 1 Accurate Cross 1 Big Chance Created
❤63🔥13👍2
Signed Precious
Jeremy Doku vs Turkey: 1 Assist 62 Touches 21 Accurate Passes 81% Pass Accuracy 13 Ground Duels Won 7 Dribbles Completed (Most) 7 Touches In Opposition Box (Most) 6 Was Fouled 5 Recoveries 3 Interceptions 2 Passes Into Final Third 1 Block 1 Big Chance Created
🔥65❤15👍4
Signed Precious
ASSIST! Iliman Ndiaye with an assist for Senegal. 🇸🇳 3-1.
🔥61❤16👍3
Signed Precious
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,832 posts we hold for @mancity247. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 9 posts on @mancity247 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
In 2022, Rico Lewis broke Benzema's record to become the youngest player in Champions League history to score on his first start in the competition. Which team did he score against?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which Manchester City manager was known as “This Charming Man”?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
During Manchester City's record-breaking 2017/18 'Centurions' campaign, what was the team's final goal difference (+GD), which remains the highest in Premier League history?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In the 2015/16 UEFA Champions League, Manchester City reached their first-ever semi-final under Manuel Pellegrini. Which team eliminated them over two legs (1–0 on aggregate)?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In the 2023 UEFA Super Cup Final against Sevilla in Piraeus, Manchester City won on penalties after a 1–1 draw. Who scored City's second-half equalizing header?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which former Manchester City manager famously wore a distinctive blue and white patterned scarf on the touchline during his reign from 2009 to 2013?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 12 September 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manchester City” (@mancity247), 44,800 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mancity247.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.