Channel
@Incentiv_Announcements_Official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,716subscribers
-125 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002069999592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Incentiv_Announcements_Official |
| Description | ✨A Layer 1 blockchain with a core mission - making blockchain technology easy, accessible, intuitive, and rewarding by redefining the blockchain experience. ✨ This group is dedicated to official announcments and updates regarding the Incentiv network. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Incentiv_Announcements_Official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:37 | 16,716 | -12 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 16,728 | -10 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 16,738 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 16,743 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 16,757 | -35 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 16,792 | -13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 16,805 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:51 | 16,816 | -17 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:10 | 16,833 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 16,841 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 16,841 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
279 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 133 | 47.7% | |
| 🔥 | 90 | 32.3% | |
| ⚡ | 26 | 9.32% | |
| 🤝 | 24 | 8.60% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 1.79% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.358% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Incentiv_Announcements_Official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 February 2026 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Bridging to incentiv takes seconds. and that's thanks to @hyperlane working under the hood. select your token. pick your chain. confirm. done. experience the speed for yourself at bridge.incentiv.io and start earning xp today!
🔥13❤5⚡3
an AI agent managing positions across 10 protocols shouldn’t worry about gas. with Incentiv, it doesn’t have to. thanks to unified token. watch ⬇️
❤14🔥4🤝1
do what centi says 🫵 collect Badges. stack XP. get multipliers. stay ahead on the Mainnet. there’s a surprise coming on the portal 👀
❤11⚡3🔥3
an AI agent will never sign three approvals for one action. incentiv was built with that in mind. bundle actions combines multiple operations into a single transaction with a single fee. autonomous rails for autonomous agents.
❤7⚡3🔥3
HURRY!!!! GO CLAIM YOUR MYSTERY BOXES ON THE INCENTIV MAINNET. NOW
🔥10❤4🤔1
testnet users, you have 48 hours left! wallet. bridge. socials. that's all it takes for your previous grind to carry forward after wednesday, the window closes forever.
🤝8⚡2❤2
sending a transaction on incentiv mainnet really pays off like really it’s how people are quietly taking over the leaderboard
🔥9
if you were on incentiv testnet, pay attention ⚠️ your grind only carries forward if you show up on the mainnet. create wallet. bridge assets. connect socials. in the next 7 days.
⚡8🔥6
There's a Mystery Box sitting in every OG Badge Holder's portal right now. If you claimed yours, go check. If you haven't, you've got until tonight. After that, the window's gone and so is whatever's inside.
❤8
f*ck it! 72 hours remain to claim your OG Badge. Multipliers. XP. Ecosystem benefits. In hindsight you’ll be glad you were early.
🔥11❤4
Your dApp deserves infrastructure that rewards you for building. Scale seamlessly, earn real rewards, and connect to a thriving ecosystem. If you're building something interesting, we want to hear about it 🤝
❤12
The OG Badge is reserved exclusively for our earliest believers. Available until Monday, 16th March.
🤝10❤7🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Incentiv_Announcements_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Incentiv Announcements & Updates - Official” (@Incentiv_Announcements_Official), 16,716 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Incentiv_Announcements_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.