2 measurements taken within a single day, net +145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,632–8,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 09:11
8,799
+145
4 Nov 2026, 15:22
8,654
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 8,799 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.20%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held
20 (12 June 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total
5,678
Reactions total
68
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 03:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
12m 17s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
377 reactions across 20 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
137
36.3%
❤
71
18.8%
👎
26
6.90%
👏
21
5.57%
🔥
19
5.04%
😱
14
3.71%
😍
11
2.92%
🤯
10
2.65%
😨
9
2.39%
🤔
8
2.12%
✍
7
1.86%
🐳
6
1.59%
🏆
5
1.33%
🥱
5
1.33%
👀
4
1.06%
⚡
3
0.796%
🍾
3
0.796%
😎
3
0.796%
🤓
3
0.796%
🗿
2
0.531%
7 further kinds
10
2.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 377 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @CuriosidadesDatos. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 Las Auroras Boreales:
⠀
¿Sabías que las auroras boreales son el resultado de una tormenta solar chocando contra la atmósfera terrestre?
⠀
Las 🌞 partículas cargadas expulsadas por el Sol viajan millones de kilómetros hasta llegar a la Tierra, donde interactúan con el 🌍 campo magnético del planeta.
⠀
Cuando esas partículas impactan contra los gases de la atmósfera, producen impresionantes …
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 Las Escaleras De Peldaños Alternos:
⠀
¿Sabías que existen escaleras muy curiosas en su forma cuyos peldaños son alternos?
⠀
Estas 🪜 escaleras de peldaños alternados (también llamadas escaleras de paso alterno) tienen escalones con una forma especial que obliga a apoyar cada 👣 pie en un lado distinto. Gracias a este diseño pueden instalarse en espacios muy reducidos.
⠀
Son habituales en 🚢…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 El Primer Robot:
⠀
¿Sabías que el primer robot industrial comenzó a trabajar en una fábrica hace más de 60 años?
⠀
El 🤖 robot Unimate fue instalado en 1961 en una fábrica de General Motors y está considerado el primer robot industrial de la historia. Su función era realizar tareas peligrosas que podían poner en riesgo a los trabajadores.
⠀
Diseñado por 👨🔬 George Devol y desarrollado jun…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 los peces que viajaron al espacio.
¿Sabías que varias espcies de 🐟 peces fueron enviados al 🚀 espacio?
Lejos de ser simples pasajeros, especies como los 🐠 medaka japoneses, los 🐟 peces cebra y los 🐡 killis participaron en experimentos diseñados para entender cómo afecta la microgravedad a los seres vivos. y estudiar cambios en los 🦴 huesos, los músculos y el desarrollo de los organism…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 al Hipopótamo 🦛
¿Sabías que el sudor de los hipopótamos es de color rojo rojizo y funciona como su propio protector solar?
Produce un fluido aceitoso compuesto por dos pigmentos: uno rojo (ácido hiposudórico) y uno naranja (ácido nor-hiposudórico). Este "sudor de sangre" cumple 3 funciones para su supervivencia:
Protección solar: Filtra los rayos ultravioleta (UV) para evitar quemadur…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 Austria Y Su Exitoso Turismo Sin Mar.
¿Sabías que Austria recibe cada año casi 50 millones de turistas teniendo una población total de tan sólo 9 millones?
La clave está en la majestuosidad de los 🏔 Alpes, que atraen millones de visitantes cada año para esquiar, hacer senderismo y disfrutar de paisajes de postal. Los lagos cristalinos funcionan como “Playas de Montaña”, ofreciendo depo…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 El Codex Gigas, la Biblia del Diablo 📖👹.
¿Sabías que existe un libro medieval tan gigante que pesa más de 75 kilos y necesitó 30 años para ser escrito?
El mayor manuscrito iluminado medieval fue creado por un solo 🛐 monje, que tardó 30 años en completarlo. Su tamaño es tan descomunal que mide casi un metro de alto y pesa más de ⚖️ 75 kilos.
El 📜 Codex Gigas contiene toda la Biblia en …
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 El Puente Hussaini, el más peligroso del mundo 🌉.
Sobre el 🌊 río Hunza, en el norte de 🇵🇰 Pakistán, se extiende un 🌉 puente colgante que desafía a cualquiera que se atreva a cruzarlo.
Para los habitantes de la región es parte de la vida cotidiana, ya que conecta aldeas aisladas en un valle rodeado de montañas, pero se trata del puente ⚠️ más peligroso del mundo.
Con más de 100 metros …
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 La Casa Sobre el Tejado 🏠🌆.
Imagina caminar por una 🛣 gran avenida de una ciudad y descubrir que, sobre la azotea de un 🏢 edificio de oficinas, hay una 🏠 casa completa con techo de tejas.
Eso ocurre en Buenos Aires, Argentina, donde en 1927 (10 años antes de que se elevara el Obelisco) se construyó el Chalet Díaz.
El empresario Rafael Díaz lo construyó para almorzar y descansar cerca …
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 El Invento Accidental del Microondas⚡️.
Seguro estás tan acostumbrado a usar tu microondas que ni lo piensas: calientas tu ☕️ café o tu 🍲 comida en segundos. Es parte de tu rutina diaria y parece algo normal, pero le debes las gracias a la casualidad.
En 1945, el ingeniero Percy Spencer descubrió por casualidad que una barra de chocolate en su bolsillo se había derretido al pasar cerca…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 Las lluvias de Peces 🐟.
¿Sabías que existen las 🌧🐠 lluvias de peces? En varios lugares del mundo se han documentado:
🇮🇷 Irán: en 2004 una tromba marina arrojó los peces sobre la ciudad de Yasuj
🇮🇳 India: lluvias de peces en Kerala y Assam durante los monzones
🇦🇺 Australia: peces vivos aparecieron en Lajamanu en 2010
🇲🇽 México: en Tampico en el 2019
🇺🇸 Estados Unidos: varios casos en Te…
Hoy ponemos nuestra Lupa en 🔎 El Partido Más Violento de un Mundial ⚽️.
¿Sabías que en el Mundial de 1962 se registraron más de 50 faltas, patadas brutales y puñetazos que obligaron a la 👮♀️ policía a entrar cuatro veces al campo?
En 1962, 🇨🇱 Chile enfrentó a 🇮🇹 Italia en un duelo que se convirtió en una 🥊 guerra. El juez no pudo frenar la violencia. Y es que en Chile no cayeron bien las notas del periodismo itali…
😨9👍8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CuriosidadesDatos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“La Lupa Curiosa” (@CuriosidadesDatos), 8,799 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CuriosidadesDatos.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.