Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 조일현

Channel

조일현

@CryptoFamily_ilhyun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,837subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224626870
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoFamily_ilhyun
Description내가 참여하는 것들만 올림
Created2 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoFamily_ilhyun

Growth

14,83414,87114,852.56 August 2026 — 14,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,870 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,867 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,856 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,855 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,856 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,850 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,834 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,835 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,837 subscribers14,8376 August 202614 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 9 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,828–14,877 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:3814,837+2
13 Aug 2026, 09:2514,835+1
12 Aug 2026, 12:0414,834-16
11 Aug 2026, 15:2314,850-6
10 Aug 2026, 13:5614,856+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:5114,855-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:4114,856-11
7 Aug 2026, 10:5314,867-3
6 Aug 2026, 13:1014,870-1
6 Aug 2026, 02:2114,871no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0314,871first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 14,837 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,730
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held22 (14 May 202615 August 2026)
Views total16,360
Reactions total198
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,330
Videos
47
Links
3,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

638 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
50479.0%
👍10616.6%
👏162.51%
🖕60.94%
🔥40.627%
🤣10.157%
🥰10.157%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 658reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC≈1,370 views79 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

대한독립만세🇰🇷

👍6514

Signed 일현이

6 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈2,050 views13 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @yeouidobi

정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다 @netdebtzer0 로 연

10🖕3

Signed 일현이

31 Jul 2026, 10:12 UTC≈3,330 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptomouseview

주식용 부캐를 만들어 투자에 대한 아이디어 기록과 복기를 위해 블로그를 시작했습니다 얼마나 열심히 할지는 모르겠습니다 그래도 할까 말까 하면 하고 후회하는 스타일이라 일단 합니다 주식 ㅈ밥의 성장을 위한 기록입니다. 재밌게 봐주세요 * 크마뷰 채널은 항상 쥐듣노와 똥글을 지향합니다. https://blog.naver.com/leverage_moment/224364041273

3🖕3🥰1

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC≈3,880 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilhyunNotesonLife

왜냐면 이 시장을 경험할수록 특정 종목이나 특정 자산군들에 대한 믿음이 얼마나 무참히 박살나는지 보게 된다. 반대로 특정 종목이나 자산군을 믿고 큰 부를 얻게 된 사람도 있다. 그런데 이런 구조가 오래 가냐는 말이다. 다들 내가 하이퍼리퀴드를 알아보고 초기부터 참여해서 안목이 있다는 느낌으로 알고 있는데 전혀 사실이 아니다. 첨부터 하이퍼리퀴드가 잘 될지 안 될지 어떻게 아노 그냥 나는 5년간 계속 반복하다가 어쩌다 하나 터진게 하이퍼리퀴드 였을뿐. 물론 하이퍼리퀴드에 좀 더 공을 들인건 사실이다. 하지만 그것은 비중의 문제 였을뿐. 나는 그때도 다른 프로젝트를 여전히 하고 있었다. 무너지지 않는 구조를 만들자. 나에겐 하나에만 몰두 하는게 아닌 여러 프로젝트에 씨를 뿌려두는게 무너지지 않는 형태였다. 그리고 더 나아가 현금 주식

41👍12

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,780 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @justdegenguy

반도체 하따를 잡으려는 나에 관해서 생각해봤음. 국장 매매는 7월 15일 반등을 마지막으로 무포지션. 160만원대에 사서 평균 매도가는 235만원 정도였고, 그 이후로는 아무것도 들고 있지 않았음. 근데 시장의 가장 큰 관심이 여전히 반도체에 쏠려있다 보니까 나도 계속 보게 됨. 최근 하락을 보고 심장이 쿵쾅대서 어제 125만원에 나도 모르게 매수버튼을 좀 큰 사이즈로 눌렀음. 그러고 금방 정리함. 포지션을 열고 정리하기까지 잠깐 생각해봤는데, 내가 왜 지금 반도체를 당연히 매매해야하는 종목으로 생각하고 있지? 기존에 진입했던 논리는 지금 대부분 사라졌음. 외국 리테일의 진입, 수급의 확장, 그리고 반도체 내러티브가 사람들을 어디까지 설득할 수 있을지에 대한 기대가 있었음. 근데 탑에서는 사실 나도 정신을 차리기가 힘들었음. 전세계

34👍3

Signed 일현이

30 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,950 views9 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @eastsouthwind

https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/222344581658

9

Signed 일현이

7 Jul 2026, 05:52 UTC≈5,380 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @vinil_11

https://m.blog.naver.com/pillion21/224332954637

21🔥4

Signed 일현이

30 Jun 2026, 07:41 UTC≈6,920 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilhyunNotesonLife

투자 채널에 제 생각과 기록을 너무 많이 올리는 것 같아, 앞으로는 이런 내용은 이곳에만 기록하려고 합니다.

18

Signed 코생코사

30 Jun 2026, 07:19 UTC≈6,370 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

혼돈의 시대, 나는 어떤 사람이 될 것인가 혼란의 시대다. 기술은 빠르게 발전하지만 그것을 다루는 지혜는 항상 같은 속도로 따라오지 않는다. 정보는 넘쳐나지만 진실을 가려내기는 점점 어려워진다. 자유는 커졌지만 책임은 회피되는 경우가 많고, 권리는 강하게 주장하면서도 의무는 소홀히 여기는 모습도 적지 않다. 질서는 약해지고, 공동체보다 개인의 이익이 우선되는 일이 늘어난다. 로버트 무어는 성숙한 남성성을 네 가지 원형으로 설명한다. 왕(King)은 질서와 책임을 세우고, 혼란 속에서도 방향을 제시하며 공동체에 안정감을 주는 존재다. 전사(Warrior)는 규율과 용기, 실행력으로 목표를 향해 나아가며, 감정에 휘둘리지 않고 해야 할 일을 해내는 존재다. 마법사(Magician)는 지식과 통찰, 분석과 객관성을 바탕으로 세상의 본질을

32👍2

Signed 일현이

24 Jun 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,830 views18 reactionsread 15 August 2026

배우/아이돌만 은밀하게하는 외모관리 (따라하면 무조건 잘생겨짐) 후.. 나중에 꼭 해야지 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOCHANRUIao

👏16👍2

Signed 일현이

24 Jun 2026, 02:30 UTC≈9,100 views65 reactionsread 15 August 2026

"매달 월급 모아서 S&P500 사세요" 예전부터 이 말이 이상하게 거슬렸다. 왜 이런 감정이 들었는지 한번 생각해봤다. 일단 좆같은 점 1. 좋은 걸 찾았는데 왜 굳이 별로인 것까지 같이 사지? 2. 내가 스스로 생각하고 판단하고 공부하고 분석할 수 있는데 왜 생각을 멈추고 시장 평균을 사야 하지? 3. 시장을 이길 수 없다고 단정하는 태도 자체가 마음에 들지 않는다. 사고의 가능성을 닫아버리는 느낌이랄까 4. 산업이 어떻게 변하는지, 기술이 어디로 가는지, 사람들이 무엇을 원하게 되는지 고민하는 것. 그런데 인덱스 투자는 그런 과정이 없다. 그냥 정해진 규칙대로 계속 사는 느낌이다. 나에게 투자란 공부, 분석, 통찰, 투자 논리의 검증과 수정을 반복하며 세상을 이해해 가는 과정이다. 여기서 돈은 가장 효과적인 현실과 연결되는 검증

64🤣1

Signed 일현이

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @CryptoFamily_ilhyun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 197,911 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“조일현” (@CryptoFamily_ilhyun), 14,837 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoFamily_ilhyun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.