Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 50 days, net -195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,510–6,763 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 13:40
6,539
-40
15 Sept 2026, 08:21
6,579
-14
11 Sept 2026, 08:59
6,593
-15
6 Sept 2026, 23:58
6,608
-24
2 Sept 2026, 13:23
6,632
-8
30 Aug 2026, 09:03
6,640
-12
27 Aug 2026, 04:36
6,652
-11
23 Aug 2026, 22:47
6,663
-20
20 Aug 2026, 17:12
6,683
-13
17 Aug 2026, 16:28
6,696
-13
14 Aug 2026, 05:48
6,709
-6
10 Aug 2026, 20:42
6,715
-17
7 Aug 2026, 21:13
6,732
-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:15
6,734
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:08
6,734
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
614 reactions across 21 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
158
25.7%
❤
121
19.7%
🤯
64
10.4%
😁
60
9.77%
🫡
49
7.98%
👍
47
7.65%
👀
37
6.03%
😢
27
4.40%
🏆
10
1.63%
✍
5
0.814%
🙏
5
0.814%
🆒
4
0.651%
💅
4
0.651%
😱
4
0.651%
🎄
3
0.489%
🗿
3
0.489%
🤮
3
0.489%
☃
2
0.326%
🌚
2
0.326%
🍌
2
0.326%
3 further kinds
4
0.651%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 614 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Crypto_Rank1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 April 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Через 1 день запускается tren.ch 👀 ( Новый Лаунчпад Solana )
🟠Из интересного что меня привлекло:
Они черным по белому пишут - если продукт будет оставаться успешным хотя бы в течение целого месяца, мы проведем крупную раздачу токенов $TRENCH в сентябре.
С первого дня можно будет начать зарабатывать ⭐️ ( тут не важен какой у вас Pnl, важен только объем. 1 SOL объема = 1 звезда, и уже если все пойдет по плану за э…
Чек-лист: как не потерять деньги в крипте
После своей ситуации собрал базовые правила. Сохраните, даже если кажется, что вы и так всё знаете. Если зайдет, то возможно соберу какую ни будь статейку на эту тему.
1) Не открывайте файлы от проектов на основном ПК
Даже если вы давно общаетесь, проект выглядит реальным и ранее уже присылал документы.
2) Используйте отдельный сервер или виртуалку для файлов
Внутри не до…
Как я потерял 90% своего портфеля
Честно, вообще не планировал об этом писать. Но прошло уже чуть больше двух месяцев с того дня, и, как говорится, время лечит. Сейчас морально я чувствую себя более устойчиво и, чтобы окончательно отпустить эту ситуацию, решил написать об этом публично.
Не знаю почему, но именно эта мысль больше всего занимает место в моей голове - как незакрытый гештальт. Я всегда сомневался, нужн…
CryptoRank pinned «Всем привет, немного апдейтов по старичкам 🤤 GRVT - анонсировали TGE 21 Июля - Для тех кто отрабатывал нужно пройти регистрацию на дроп токена $GRVT ‼️Пройти регу нужно до 17 Июля ( до завтра ) ➡️Ссылка на регистрацию ( я выбрал все на TGE ) Сейчас на…»
Всем привет, немного апдейтов по старичкам
🤤 GRVT - анонсировали TGE 21 Июля
- Для тех кто отрабатывал нужно пройти регистрацию на дроп токена $GRVT
‼️Пройти регу нужно до 17 Июля ( до завтра )
➡️Ссылка на регистрацию ( я выбрал все на TGE )
Сейчас на полике 83% FDV 200кк$ и 68% FDV 300кк$
⚡️ Hibachi - выкатили большую статью ( кому интересно можете почитать )
📍Важное из статьи, сейчас идет последний сезон, …
Никогда не было, и вот опять.
Taiko вчера потеряли 1,7m$ потому что хранили приватный ключ у себя в публичном GitHub ( Вот так 2 раза делай и ты всегда будешь богат )
Что произошло по итогу!?
В репозитории taikoxyz/raiko (это их multi-prover стек) больше 2 лет лежал приватный ключ enclave-key.pem (RSA ключ для Intel SGX enclave).
- Злоумышленник зарегистрировал свой фейковый SGX → начал подписывать фальшивые до…
Сделал очередной разбор сегодняшних 4 матчей у себя в Twitter
🇦🇷🇦🇹 Argentina = Austria
🇫🇷🇮🇶 France = Iraq
🇳🇴🇸🇳 Norway = Senegal
🇯🇴🇩🇿 Jordan = Algeria
➡️Ссылка на пост
➡️Ссылка на Polymarket
P.s На всякий случай повторюсь, посты связанные с футболом исключительно только потому что я решил плотно отработать Polymarket - а если быть точнее, докручиваю свои аккаунты. а то некоторые мне пишут в ЛС уже что я с крипты пе…
Токен $BP летит в космос👀 кто додержал дроп ❔
Держу🔥
Все слил🤯
На этом фоне так же начала отрастать NFT коллекция Mad Lads ( я немного набирал их на фаде )
Если вы пострадали от взлома Drift то они на днях запустили программу по рефаунду
➡️Ссылка на анонс
➡️Проверить имеете ли вы права на возврат средств можете по ссылке
Пострадал 🤯
Не трогал эту помойку, пронесло🔥
Сделал очередной разбор сегодняшних 4 матчей у себя в Twitter
🇪🇦🇸🇦Spain vs Saudi Arabia
🇧🇪🇮🇷Belgium vs Iran
🇺🇾🇨🇻Uruguay vs Cabo Verde
🇳🇿🇪🇬New Zealand vs Egypt
➡️Ссылка на пост
➡️Ссылка на Polymarket
P.S. На Polymarket можно собирать экспрессы через Build a Combo
Для тех кто отрабатывает polymarket
Сегодня будет 3 матча по футболу - у себя в Х сделал разбор этих матчей
➡️Ссылка на пост ( постарался сделать максимально коротко и информативно )
P.s Если вы отрабатываете полик и вам в принципе интересен ЧМ и такого рода посты, оставьте реакцию 🔥ну а если не интересно можете оставить любую другую реакцию ( так я смогу понять делать такие посты в TG или нет, на Х я точно буду…
Polygon zkEVM прекращает свою работу 1 Июля📍
Проверьте может у кого что лежит ( и про LP не забудьте )
➡️Ссылка на анонс
🫡10🔥2🤯2☃1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @Crypto_Rank1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
БОГДАН, ГДЕ ИКСЫ?! @BogdanGdeX · 25,977 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
PROFIT MAFIA @ProfiT_Mafia · 35,469 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
PROFIT DRIVE @profit_drive · 21,855 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
Liberty ICO | Crypto @libertycryptoq · 20,849 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 25 September 2026
a01k.Crypto @a01k_crypto · 30,865 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 6 September 2026
Coin Metrika @CoinMetrika · 34,886 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Crypto & AI Updates | Славик инвестор @Slavik_investor_updates · 20,746 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
PROCENT @procent_crypto · 21,500 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 September 2026
CRYPTUS MEDIA @CRYPTUS_MEDIA · 71,232 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Славик инвестор | TwitterScore.io @slavik_investor · 24,702 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
CryptoHustle @crypthustle · 20,483 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 September 2026
Whitelist Media @whitelist1 · 41,611 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
Max Zarev @maxzarev · 25,143 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Don | Invest Blog @don_invest · 38,578 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoRank” (@Crypto_Rank1), 6,539 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Rank1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.