File, posted without a caption

Channel
الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفةعلى اهل البيت(ع)
@Ahmaed202096
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22,104subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001433844147 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ahmaed202096 |
| Description | القناة تُعنَى ببيان وكشف الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفة والمصحفة والمُدَّلسة والمقطعة والضعيفة وغير ذلك. |
| Created | 9 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ahmaed202096 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 22,104 | +18 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 22,086 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:16 | 22,078 | +18 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 22,060 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 22,055 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 22,049 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 22,038 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 22,033 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 22,033 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.8%
- avg views ÷ 22,104 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,710
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 March 2026 – 23 July 2026) |
| Views total | 7,420 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,490
- Videos
- ≈108
- Links
- ≈1,020
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 44s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
من أفضل ما كُتِب عن القضية الحسينية كتاب نافذة على التاريخ في ربع قرن للسيد مهدي الخرسان (رحمه الله تعالى) الصادر عن مركز الأبحاث العقائدية والمركز برعاية مكتب سماحة السيد السيستاني (دام ظله). لتحميل الكتاب👇🏻
اللَّهُمَّ اشْهَدْ أَنِّي قَدْ بَلَّغْتُ.
File, posted without a caption
الصحيح من مقتل سيد الشهداء وأصحابه عليهم السلام تأليف محمد الريشهري بمساعدة محمود الطباطبائي نژاد روح الله السيد طبائي
سماحة الشيخ محمد هادي اليوسفي الغروي (دامت بركاته) يوصي الخطباء بكتاب الصحيح من مقتل سيد الشهداء وأصحابه عليهم السلام للشيخ محمد الريشهري. ✍️/فَوَائِد وَخَوَاطِر وَعِبَر https://t.me/benefits_Ahmad1
السؤال/هل تُوجَد روايات في أكل التمر على العدد الفردي لا الزوجي؟ الجواب/ نعم هناك روايات عديدة رواها السنة والشيعة في مصادرهما فمنها: ١-مارواه السنة في صحيح البخاري عن أنس قال كان رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لا يغدو يوم الفطر حتى يأكل تمرات وقال مرجأ بن رجاء حدثني عبيد الله قال حدثني أنس عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم ويأكلهن وترا . 📚/صحيح البخاري، ج ٢،ص٣. وروى الخطيب البغدادي عن جابر بن عبد الله . قال : كان رسول …
Photo, posted without a caption
السؤال/ماصحة هذا الحديث:(آخر ماقاله الإمام الحسين (عليه السلام) قبل قطع رأسه الشريف يوم عاشوراء وتتمحور معظمها حول التسليم بقضاء الله والدعاء ومنها دعاء اللحظات الأخيرة اللهم إني وفيتُ بوعدي فأوفِ لي بوعدك ونجِ شيعتي من النار)؟ الجواب/ لم يرد في مصادر السنة والشيعة التي وصلتْ إلينا.
الشكر موصول لله وللقائمين عليها والكلام طويل عن فوائدها وميزاتها ولكن الحمد لله رب العالمين.
مكتبة الشيعة الألكترونية مكتبة وأيُّ مكتبة لقد استفدتُ منها كثيراً كثيراً ففيها أغلب مصادر المسلمين على اختلاف طوائفهم ومشاربهم وفيها ميزات تفوق بها على المكتبات الأخرى ولكن للأسف تم حذفها من النت وبقيت على أجهزة الآيفون القديمة.
السؤال/ماصحة نسبة هذا الحديث إلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله (جارك ثم جارك ثم جارك ثم أخاك)؟ الجواب/ ١-لم يرد في مصادر السنة والشيعة التي وصلتْ إلينا. ٢-هذه مقولة شعبية متداولة بين الناس. ✍️/الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفة على أهل البيت (ع) https://t.me/Ahmaed202096
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Ahmaed202096. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 243,378 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الأحاديث المكذوبة والمحرفةعلى اهل البيت(ع)” (@Ahmaed202096), 22,104 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ahmaed202096.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.