Channel
@mesbah_qom
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,497subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001131496432 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mesbah_qom |
| Created | 12 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mesbah_qom |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 4,497 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 4,488 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:50 | 4,494 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 4,494 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,607 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
قبل أيّام، أقيمت مباهلةٌ بين طرفين من السّلفية، أحدهما يكفِّر النوويّ والسّيوطيّ، والآخر يرفض ذلك أشدّ الرّفض، وقد رأينا في هذا الموقف أعاجيب، منها: ما يشير إلى قلّة الفقه في الدّين، والسّلفية أخسُّ المذاهب الإسلاميّة في صناعة الفقه، فهم أقرب إلى الحشويّة، ولا زالت الحواضر العلميّة التقليديّة عند أهل السنّة تتقدّم عليهم في هذا المجال، بينما هم أصبحوا لقلّة بضاعتهم مأوى للآراء الشّاذّة والعجائب الفقهيّة أكثر من غيرهم،…
من آفات وسائل التّواصل الاجتماعيّ: حُبّ الشّهرة، ورواج السّطحيّة والابتذال. فمن المُلاحظ أنّ بعض البشر لا يقرّ له قرار من دون أن يكون مذكوراً مشهوراً تشير إليه الأصابع وتلهج بذكره الألسن وأن يكون حديثَ السّاعة ولو كان محتواه سطحيّاً مبتذلاً، وعلاج ذلك يكمن في تهذيب النّفس وطلب العلم، فمن هذّب نفسه لم يبالِ أن يُعرَف أم لا، أو يذكره النّاس أو لا، أو يكون «حديث السّاعة»، وإلّا فالانجرار خلف هذا الأمر يورث المهالك ويُذْ…
☀️مراعاة أحكام الدِّين ومخافة الله في السّياسة الشّرعية والتّدبير عند أمير المؤمنين (عليه السّلام) قال أبو جعفر الإسكافي في كتابه (المعيار والموازنة): "فإنْ قالوا: فدلّونا على فضل عليٍّ في الرّأي والتّدبير كما دللتم في فضله في الشّجاعة والجهاد، وقد تعلمون أنّ قريشاً طعنتْ عليه في رأيه، وضعّفته في تدبيره. قلنا لهم: أمّا تضعيف قريش له في تدبيره ورأيه فبالعداوة والعصبيّة، لا بحقٍّ طعنوا، ولا حجّة على دعواهم أقاموا، وإل…
الصفحة الشخصية في منصة X: https://x.com/ejawad91
سلسلة تاريخ أحاديث النصّ على الأئمّة (عليهم السّلام) على اليوتيوب رابط قائمة التّشغيل: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLcPgzzhvsW4c - تفضّل برفعها أحد الإخوة -جزاه الله خيراً-.
لولا البكاء على الحسين صلوات الله عليه لاندثرت مظلوميّته ولنُسيت فاجعته، ولكان مقتله أمراً عابراً في تاريخ الإسلام، في حين أنّ الله تعالى جعل قيام الحسين عليه السّلام قطب رحى الإسلام وحصناً من حصونه، فهو الذّاب عن دين الله حقّاً. ثمّ يأتيك بارِدٌ سقيم الرّأي يقول لك: الحسين لم يقتل لتبكي عليه! الحسين لا ينفعه بكاؤك! القضية الحسينية لا يخدمها البكاء! في حين أنّه لولا البكاء الممتدّ والرنّة الحزينة واللّوعة العظيمة لما…
«إنْ كُنْتَ بَاكِياً لشَيءٍ فابْكِ للحُسَيْنِ بنِ عَلِيِّ بنِ أبِي طَالِبٍ عَلَيْهِ السَّلَامُ؛ فإنَّهُ ذُبِحَ كَمَا يُذْبَحُ الكَبْشُ..». بهذا المقطع من حديث الريّان بن شبيب عن الرّضا عليه السّلام بدأ سماحة السيّد ميرباقري حفظه الله فقرة النّعي اللّيلة الماضية، في إيماءة لطيفة وتنبيه مهذّب لما بدر من النّاعي في اللّيلة السّابقة حيث خصّص مقداراً وافراً لنعي القائد الشّهيد (رحمه الله)، وفي مقام التّنبيه، ذكر السيّد ر…
Video, posted without a caption
الحافظ الذهبيّ: ردّ حديث الشّيعة يُذهِبُ جملةً من الآثار النبويّة وهذه مفسدة بيِّنة رابط الوثائق: اضغط هنا
جابر بن عبد الله الأنصاري وأبو سعيد الخدريّ (رضي الله عنهما): ما كنّا نعرف المنافقين إلّا ببغض عليّ (عليه السّلام) رابط الوثائق: اضغط هنا
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم في أجواء عيد الغدير المبارك، نشرع بعون الله تعالى بنشر دروس سلسلة «تاريخ أحاديث النصّ على الأئمّة عليهم السّلام»، والتي بسطنا فيها الجواب عن إشكالية التّنافي بين تراث الإماميّة الحاوي لروايات النصّ وتاريخ الشّيعة الذي يحكي وقوع الخلاف في القرون الأولى، وما تبعه من نشوء فرق مختلفة بعد وفاة كلّ إمام. نسأل الله التّوفيق والسّداد والثّبات على ولاية أئمّة الهدى عليهم السلام.
تاريخ أحاديث النصّ على الأئمّة (عليهم السّلام) - الجلسة الأولى (١) محاور الجلسة: • مقدّمة حول البحث ومنهجه. • شرح الإشكال التّاريخي على أحاديث النصّ على الأئمّة. • بيان الجذور التاريخية للإشكال، وذكر كلمات علماء الزيدية والأشاعرة. • بيان تقرير محمد باقر البهبوديّ للإشكال ومحاولته معالجة المسألة. • نقد الإشكال التاريخي: بيان جواب الشّيخ الصّدوق رحمه الله. • بيان موجز حول الأبحاث اللّاحقة.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @mesbah_qom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 15,856 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مصباح الهداية” (@mesbah_qom), 4,497 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mesbah_qom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.