Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed علي الإبراھيمي | ˛ َِ𝘈َِ𝘭َِ𝘪 . 🇮🇶

Channel
@aitilafalraafida
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,469subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001816171877 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aitilafalraafida |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aitilafalraafida |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 1,469 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1,470 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 1,471 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 1,467 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 1,465 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 1,471 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 1,470 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 1,471 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 1,471 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed علي الإبراھيمي | ˛ َِ𝘈َِ𝘭َِ𝘪 . 🇮🇶
رفع الشبهات عن سماحة المرجع الأعلى والاعلم السيد الإمام علي الحسيني السيستاني دام ظله الشريف https://t.me/shiahoar/7762
Signed علي الإبراھيمي | ˛ َِ𝘈َِ𝘭َِ𝘪 . 🇮🇶
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
File, posted without a caption
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
هل يناقض خلق الإنسان من التراب خلقه من النطفة؟
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
🔰اكذوبة نظرية عدالة الصحابة عند اهل السنة: المبحث الاول المبحث الثاني المبحث الثالث المبحث الرابع هذه هي مباني اهل السنة في عدالة الصحابة
⚡2
Signed علي الإبراھيمي | ˛ َِ𝘈َِ𝘭َِ𝘪 . 🇮🇶
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
فقال : يا أبا أحمد مامن مؤمن يرتكب ذنباً إلا ساءه ذلك وندم عليه ، وقد قال النبي : كفى بالندم توبة. وقال : من سرته حسنته وساءته سيئته فهو مؤمن ، فمن لم يندم على ذنب يرتكبه فليس بمؤمن ولم تجب له الشفاعة ، وكان ظالماً والله تعالى ذكره يقول : ما للظالمين من حميم ولا شفيع يطاع. فقلت له : يا ابن رسول الله وكيف لا يكون مؤمناً من لم يندم على ذنب يرتكبه؟ فقال : يا أبا أحمد ما من أحد يرتكب كبيرة من المعاصي وهو يعلم أنه سيع…
👍1
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
🖇️الجواب على شبهة كمال الحيدري في عذاب الله وشفاعته 🔴الجواب على كمال المنحرف : القول بأن الإله الذي يقدمه الفقهاء إله جلاد لأنهم يذكرون العقوبات والعذاب بينما القرآن يكرر وصف الله بالرحمن الرحيم مبني على مغالطة أساسية وهي تصور أن الرحمة والعقوبة متناقضان بذاتهما مع أن القرآن نفسه وهو المصدر الأول في معرفة الله جمع بينهما في مواضع كثيرة ولم يرَ في اجتماعهما أي تناقض. فالسؤال الصحيح ليس : هل الله رحيم أم يعاقب❓ بل…
👏1
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
كمال الحيدري : إله الفقه جلاد !!
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
فالمناط عنده ليس مجرد حصول المشابهة الخارجية، وإنما التعمد في إحداث هيئة الآخر. ولهذا قال في اللباس أيضًا إن العبرة تختلف باختلاف أعراف البلاد، فقال إن لباس الرجال والنساء قد لا يختلف في بعض البلاد، وإنما يكون الامتياز بأمور أخرى كالاحتجاب والاستتار. وهذا يؤيد أن العرف داخل في تحديد موضوع التشبه، وليس كل هيئة توجد عند امرأة وتوجد عند رجل تصبح بمجرد ذلك «تشبهًا». 📙 فتح الباري لابن حجر – باب المتشبهين بالنساء والمتش…
🫡2
Signed ☫ صَفاءُ الطّائيّ ☫
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @aitilafalraafida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الرد على جميع الشـبهات” (@aitilafalraafida), 1,469 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aitilafalraafida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.