Channel
@tasheehkutub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,770subscribers
+84 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001220511325 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tasheehkutub |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tasheehkutub |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:14 | 2,770 | +9 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 2,761 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:40 | 2,752 | +14 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 2,738 | +21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 22:15 | 2,717 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:58 | 2,712 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 2,704 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 2,700 | +14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 2,686 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 2,686 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 35 | 64.8% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 14.8% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 5.56% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.70% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.85% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 1.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
من نماذج سوء فهم الأساليب العربية عند بعض المخالفين ما ذكره بعضهم في حديث الطير: (اللهمَّ ائْتِني بأحبِّ الخلقِ إليك يأكل معي هذا الطيرَ, فجاءَه عليٌّ فأكل معَهُ) لنفي دلالة الحديث على أفضلية أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام، فقال: إن النبي صلى الله عليه وآله دعا الله أن يأتيه بأحب الخلق، وقد استجاب الله دعاءه، بأن جاءه أبو بكر أولا وإن لم يأكل معه. وهذا كلام سخيف، فإن قوله صلى الله عليه وآله: (يأكل معي هذا الطير) إن كان جز…
👍3🤝1🤷1😇1
رأيت بعض الإخوة المحاورين - وفقهم الله - لا يحسنون الإجابة عن الإشكال في حديث (الحسن والحسين سيدا شباب أهل الجنة) الذي يطرحه بعض المخالفين على متن الحديث، وهذه ثلاثة أجوبة يذكرها ابن الحاجب النحوي العامي، لعل أوضحها الثالث. المصدر: أمالي ابن الحاجب، ج1، ص760. الإملاء 69.
🤝5👍3
خلافة الإمام الحسن (عليه السلام) بين النص والاختيار، وقفة مع الباحث عمرو بسيوني. #الإمام_الحسن عليه السلام #المجتبى #العتبة_العباسية
👍3
📜 بحث بعنوان: خلافة الإمام الحسن (عليه السلام) بين النص والاختيار، وقفة مع الباحث عمرو بسيوني. بقلم: الأخ العزيز الشيخ حسين الصالح ( دام توفيقه) 🏛 المقال منشور ضمن المؤتمر العلمي الدولي السنوي الحادي عشر حول الإمام الحسن (عليه السلام)، الذي أُقيم عام 1447هـ - 2025م، بتنظيم من العتبة العباسية المقدسة. #الإمام_الحسن عليه السلام #المجتبى #العتبة_العباسية
👍2
من كتاب مناقب الأسد الغالب علي بن أبي طالب، لابن الجزري (ت٨٣٣)
👍3👌1😍1
الشيخ أحمد آل طوق (ت١٢٤٥) ينقل عن بعض المتأخرين ما يدل على جزمه بنسبة كتاب الاختصاص لأحمد بن الحسين بن أحمد بن عمران
👍2
الحديث عن الصادق عليه السلام: (من زار علي بن موسى والحسين بن علي في سنة واحدة ...) لا أحسبه مثبتا في مصادرنا. وصاحب الكتاب من الزيدية
👍2
فضل زيارة الرضا عليه السلام من الكتاب نفسه
👍2
مقتل الحسين من كتاب السفينة الجامعة لأنواع العلوم للحاكم الجشمي (٤٩٤هج)
👍3
من فوائد الكتاب ذكره أن الحسين عليه السلام عقد ابنته سكينة على عبد الله في كربلاء، وهذا المنشور هو ترجمة السيد البراقي للترجمة الفارسية، لأن الأصل العربي مفقود
المنتخب من تاريخ الأسر الطالبية، وهو الباب الثالث من كتاب تاريخ قم للحسن الأشعري (ق4)
دار الإمام الهادي عليه السلام في سامراء، ومنازعة ابن الخصيب مقال يتناول دار الإمام في سامراء وما ورد من منازعة للوزير ابن الخصيب وإلحاحه على الإمام في أخذ الدار، والسبب في طمع وزير بالاستيلاء على دار الإمام. مضافا إلى معالجة إشكال تاريخي في متن الرواية.
👍6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tasheehkutub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رياض الفوائد” (@tasheehkutub), 2,770 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tasheehkutub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.