Channel
@happyfridayindex
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
180subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001498070313 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @happyfridayindex |
| Description | 屬於香港人的Happy Friday Index上線喇！ |
| Created | 12 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/happyfridayindex |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 180 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 180 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 December 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
#happyfridayindex #香港人樓價信心指數 喺2023年嘅今日，樓價開始跌，作為香港人，你點睇對未來一年嘅樓價？（0為最悲觀，死人塌樓沙士價，即出現大量負資產，要錢唔要樓，5為最樂觀，認為樓價最疲弱時候已經過，係入市良機）
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Admin專欄 #開心香港 @Windseasonbro TLDR: 對於『開心香港』，風巴強烈建議大家睇下呢個MV 。 繼『Hello Hong Kong』之後，港共政府喺2023年4月尾宣佈推出『開心香港 Happy Hong Kong』宣傳活動。 『好玩好食開心積極』呢句Slogan，係開心香港嘅口號，坦白講，唔好講政治，呢句口號太市井，彷彿停留喺上世紀八十年代小學口號比賽一般。 本來，如果有實際嘅活動配合，口號的確係有畫龍點睛嘅作用。但如今香港，何開心之有？ 如果大家記得，我有一個Channel叫做『HappyFridayIndex』當時喺2019年7月12號，進行第一次調查，詢問喺2019年7月7號至7月12號當日，包括政治在內嘅因素，以『1』為最唔開心，『5』為最開心，追蹤每個星期五嘅香港人究竟開唔開心？ 雖然當年都唔係太開心，但我哋見到，第一次調查時，果530個受訪者入面，揀最唔開心嘅只有25%嘅人，…
對上一次令你回心微笑嘅事係乜？歡迎投稿至 @windseasonbro ，我會放喺 @hongkongersecrets
#久違的happyfridayindex : 香港人，你快樂嗎？ （0為最不快樂，5為最快樂）。
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#投稿 港人開心指數創五年新高 | LIHKG https://lihkg.com/thread/3176072/page/1
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，撞爛得得b嘅小朋友要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，家長要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，親中紅店Kkplus(Lego中港代理商，京林屋同Lulu豬都係佢)要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Admin專欄 #咪撚幫襯Kkplus同Lego、Lulu豬任何產品 @windseasonbro 今日發生咗一件事，就係一個小朋友喺朗豪坊某一間高檔玩具店Kkplus整爛咗一個比佢更高嘅天線得得B公仔展品，阿媽要賠5萬畀間玩具店，最後玩具店收6折，埋單都要3萬幾。 就咁睇上面「事實」嘅陳述，或者你會認為玩具店一方大量，無收足錢，而通常小朋友百厭，輿論自然而然衝向屌佢父母唔識湊仔云云。 不過，喺連登睇到d point令我覺得個小朋友無錯，整合喺度分享，請大家Share畀你身邊所有朋友，尤其會買高檔玩具嘅朋友： 1⃣ 展品lala無用圍欄封住，正常易碎嘅展品絕對要咁做。 2⃣ 展品lala係空心，但佢無任何標示。 3⃣ 店員指呢個展品一年爛四次。 4⃣ 小朋友不知就裡，以為公仔實心，點知係空心，挨咗先知仆街中伏。 5⃣ 佢媽媽有當場話自己唔識教仔，並賠錢。 6⃣ 事實上唔係小朋友奔跑玩耍撞跌，只係佢攰得滯搵嘢挨…
#投票 喺你識嘅人入面(定義：包含現實中所有識嘅人，同事，同學，同居非同居屋企人，親戚，樓下看更，去開食飯會打招呼認得嘅人，不包括明星名人)，有幾多人中撚咗武肺？(海外手足/中國人都可以參與投票，剩係投身處喺香港嘅朋友情況)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#投票 喺你識嘅人入面(定義：包含現實中所有識嘅人，同事，同學，同居非同居屋企人，親戚，樓下看更，去開食飯會打招呼認得嘅人)，有幾多人中撚咗武肺？(海外手足/中國人都可以參與投票，剩係投身處喺香港嘅朋友情況)
#投票 喺你朋友圈子入面(定義：真係fd唔係純粹同事同學)，有幾多人中撚咗武肺？(海外手足/中國人都可以參與投票，剩係投身處喺香港嘅朋友情況)
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @happyfridayindex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 11 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#happyfridayindex #香港人樓價信心指數 喺2023年嘅今日，樓價開始跌，作為香港人，你點睇對未來一年嘅樓價？（0為最悲觀，死人塌樓沙士價，即出現大量負資產，要錢唔要樓，5為最樂觀，認為樓價最疲弱時候已經過，係入市良機）
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#久違的happyfridayindex : 香港人，你快樂嗎？ （0為最不快樂，5為最快樂）。
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，撞爛得得b嘅小朋友要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，家長要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#Sadtuesdayindex ： 你認為天線得得B五萬文事件，親中紅店Kkplus(Lego中港代理商，京林屋同Lulu豬都係佢)要付上幾多責任？ 0為最低，9為最高。
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#投票 喺你識嘅人入面(定義：包含現實中所有識嘅人，同事，同學，同居非同居屋企人，親戚，樓下看更，去開食飯會打招呼認得嘅人，不包括明星名人)，有幾多人中撚咗武肺？(海外手足/中國人都可以參與投票，剩係投身處喺香港嘅朋友情況)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 December 2021 to 3 August 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Happy Friday Index” (@happyfridayindex), 180 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/happyfridayindex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.