Channel
@twhchannelgp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
709subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001313998492 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @twhchannelgp |
| Created | 22 February 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/twhchannelgp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 709 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 713 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 712 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 712 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (17 April 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 749 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#李老師不是你老師 本名李穎，係旅居意大利嘅藝術家。2022年白紙運動期間，大量中國網民將示威現場、封控事故同民間消息傳畀佢，再由佢透過社交平台向外發布，令外界得以睇見中國民間真實情況。自此，佢成為外界了解中國公民抗爭同社會壓迫嘅重要窗口。 Source: @unitinghkers 近日，李老師接受《追光者》訪問，談到佢對今日香港嘅觀察。 佢指出，一啲喺中國內地未必會被視為特別嚴重嘅事，例如賣書、着件印有政治字句嘅衫、公開悼念六四，去到今日香港，卻隨時會被上綱上線，甚至上升到「國安」層面，被政權重手打壓。 呢個觀察最可怕嘅地方在於： 香港已經唔只係「愈來愈似中國」，而係喺某些政治打壓上，走得比中國更前。 香港政府而家做嘅，已經唔係單純維穩，而係刻意用更高調、更敏感、更具威嚇性嘅方式執法，向北京證明自己夠忠誠、夠狠、夠徹底。佢哋要打壓嘅，唔只係某一本書、某一件衫、某一次悼念，而係香港人曾經擁有過自由嘅記憶。 因為對政權…
有屋企人食開血壓藥嘅請注意，香港公立醫院已將進口藥換成大陸藥
【明光社總幹事批評鄧炳強不公佈禁書名單】 【「是濫權、是破壞法治精神的行為」】 【法律是約制政府和執法人員的行為，不能隨意以人治代替法治，以莫須有的罪名打壓異見人士】 https://www.instagram.com/p/DbdxHCxoEZ8/
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
【風暴消息】香港天文台在12時40分發出三號強風信號。
#紅霞風雨時程 🌀風暴剖析+八號風球機會 颱風紅霞正逼近廣東沿岸，預計明日(26/7)上午最接近港澳，分別在其東北約100和200公里內掠過，屆時有機會以強颱風級別在惠州至汕尾一帶登陸。 紅霞為一股中小型的熱帶氣旋，結構較緊密，現時其中心附近最大風力約為每小時140公里，烈風圈北側半徑擴大至約170公里，其餘方位的半徑約140公里；而暴風圈和颶風圈半徑分別擴大至約80公里和55公里。 由於身處紅霞的可航半圓，同時受地形屏蔽影響，風力因而偏弱(除了雷雨帶過境期間)，但當紅霞進一步逼近時，起風將會較急，其眼牆更有機會觸及香港，或有利當地出現更猛烈風勢。按照現時預測，本台估計香港晚間改發八號風球的機會高，澳門則中等；假如屬實，香港維持八號信號的時間或會接近半日，較澳門長得多。 🌀港澳風雨時程 過去兩三小時，港澳曾受紅霞外圍相關的雷雨和猛烈陣風影響。預料晚上轉吹清勁西北風，香港部分離岸吹強風，沿海風浪逐步增強。 而明日(26/7…
天文台表示，本港未來一兩小時或受冰雹影響。 高溫觸發的強雷雨區正於廣東內陸發展，並有發展成一颮線的趨勢。預料該颱前颮線會向西南移動，或在未來數小時影響本港。 受高溫影響，現時廣東沿岸累積一定能量，颱前颮線相關的對流活動可能會繼續增強。因此，強雷雨區可能會有增強及擴展的趨勢，冰雹、強陣風及雷暴等強對流天氣風險亦會相對較高。 讀者應提防冰雹、強陣風、雷暴及大驟雨的風險。
南丫海難死因研訊｜家屬不獲批法援 撤回死因裁決司法覆核 https://bit.ly/4fxSLLv
假香港人的英國血淚史 本來只想在 X（即之前的Twitter）上看看伊朗局勢，但陰差陽錯，卻看到了一個熱度比伊朗話題更高的帖子。全知全能的演算法大概覺得我是華文假資訊的理想受眾，居然派給我一位「年薪180萬港幣」的「前香港媒體總監」在英國超市搬貨的短片。 點開一看，厲害了，87萬瀏覽量！這流量把什麼伊朗戰況都拋離九條街，評論區更精彩，滿屏的簡化字留言指指點點，有些比較持平理性，但也不乏對香港人的冷嘲熱諷，如「一个背叛自己民族国家的垃圾」、「这些人脑子坏了，只能送到西方国家当苦力」，諸如此類。 發帖的帳號叫「亞洲金融 Asia Finance」，短片的說明文字是這樣寫的（我把它轉成正體中文）： 「她叫馮明媚。之前在香港做媒體總監，年薪180萬港幣；現在英國超市理貨，稅後2100磅。從歷史長河來看，現在評判馮明媚的選擇，還為時過早。40歲的馮明媚，在20歲開始當記者，採訪過成龍周星馳，35歲成電影公司宣發總監，3…
Photo, posted without a caption
嗰套「功夫女足」一定係滿滿的中国中共元素，先會出到嚟咁爛🤭
【男警涉爭執期間襲擊妻子 控方申請撤回3罪獲批 男警准以1500元簽保守行為24個月】 全文閱讀📍https://bit.ly/4ayEuws
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @twhchannelgp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 519,115 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@twhchannelgp named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大窩口Channel” (@twhchannelgp), 709 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twhchannelgp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.