// комьюнити невест и профи
Реклама и по всем вопросам: @hello_weddywood
Отдел заботы для профи: @weddywood_care
Email [email protected]
РКН: https://clck.ru/3GCH76
идеи, тренды, истории, события и эксперты.
Created
11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -392. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,282–20,792 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 11:17
20,341
-37
17 Aug 2026, 13:15
20,378
-44
16 Aug 2026, 07:54
20,422
-71
14 Aug 2026, 16:26
20,493
-36
13 Aug 2026, 06:06
20,529
-28
12 Aug 2026, 08:02
20,557
-24
11 Aug 2026, 06:44
20,581
-24
10 Aug 2026, 09:55
20,605
-63
9 Aug 2026, 08:43
20,668
-23
8 Aug 2026, 11:06
20,691
-30
7 Aug 2026, 13:45
20,721
-12
7 Aug 2026, 08:30
20,733
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:21
20,733
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.03%
avg views ÷ 20,341 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
44 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
44
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held
44 (6 August 2026 – 18 August 2026)
Views total
44,975
Reactions total
1,319
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,100
Videos
≈1,390
Links
≈2,120
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 45s
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,319 reactions across 44 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
751
56.9%
🔥
193
14.6%
😍
189
14.3%
custom 5836992354925420736
127
9.63%
👍
31
2.35%
💯
15
1.14%
👎
8
0.607%
custom 5981301482249524619
4
0.303%
👀
1
0.076%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 44 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @weddywood_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎀 Главный редактор Buro 24/7 Екатерина Дарма и её муж Тимур Сардаров ждут второго ребёнка! #новости
Екатерина поделилась кадрами со стильной съёмки и объявила радостную новость в соцсетях.
Поздравляем! 🤍
фото: Алексей Киселёв
Обожаем узнавать, как Weddywood становится частью вашей подготовки 🥹❤️
А сегодня передаём слово невесте Кате:
⭐️Моя подготовка к свадьбе началась с покупки органайзера невест от Weddywood. Отдельной любовью стали для меня шопинг-лист и чат невест.
Внутри сообщества я получила очень много поддержки, когда случилась неприятная ситуация со вторым платьем. Многие откликнулись и порекомендовали ателье и магазины с похо…
Нишевая лавстори, которую мы заслужили 😄
House of Z выпустили классный ии-арт с Криштиано Роналдо и Джорджиной Родригес.
Выглядит даже круче свадебных фоток. А вам как?
🔥 — вау!
👀 — мимо
фото: AI generation, House of Z
Мы тут узнали, что Канье выступит в России, поэтому уже представляем количество предложений и свадеб прямо на концерте 😍
Вы любите такое? Мы — очень!
фото: ahmetemresaka, kenke_photo
А мы поздравляем с годовщиной нашу модную любимку Олю Монастырскую-Улекину, автора телеграм-канала Fashion Dnevnik 🤍
По этому случаю вспоминаем их свадьбу, которая знатно пошумела в 2024 году. Всеми подробностями праздника Оля специально для Weddywood делилась ▶️ тут.
фото: Илья Тягаев
Bratz креативно поздравили Мадонну с днём рождения, воссоздав обложку её нового альбома.
Это что, официальная кукла эры невесты?💍🥰
фото: madonna, bratz
А вот и первые кадры с росписи Криштиано Роналдо и Джорджины Родригес ❤️
Пара поженилась в 10-летие своего знакомства — 11 августа, в приватной обстановке, в окружении детей.
«Раньше я мечтала о самом большом замке, карете, длинном платье и короне, полной бриллиантов. А теперь говорю: нет. Я хотела чего-то камерного — дома, с любимым человеком и нашими детьми. Потому что замки, дома, острова, лошади, машины — всё э…
6 советов по составлению свадебного меню 🍽
Вместе с бренд-шефом и event-отделом Fresa’s Restaurant Group обсудили, как составить идеальное свадебное меню и какие нюансы учесть 🫰🏻
Больше советов о том, как сделать ужин частью праздника, ищи ▶️ тут.
фото: le_supper.club, danielkimphoto, tomcoburn_, flowersbyford, Furchef, corso_catering
🤠 Ковбойская свадьба в стиле «Южного парка» — почему бы и да!
Персонажи с чертами пары и их друзей, нарисованные специально для праздника, розовые початки кукурузы вместо букета и родео-бык в зоне встречи гостей.
Подробности этой яркой свадьбы читай ▶️ тут.
фото: Александр и Карина Шевцовы
фото закулисья: Сергей Бузин
организатор: Kate&Leo
декор: FQ Space, Caxapdecor
ведущий: Рома Данилюк
видеограф: 35mm
видеограф…
Тренды свадебных тортов 2027 🎂
Вместе с кондитерами Weddywood обсудили, какие десерты будут актуальны в следующем сезоне и как сделать свадебный торт частью вашей истории.
Все подробности собрали ▶️ в нашей статье.
Эксперты: Cakeinflowers, Shiana_cake, KATEBAKERY
фото: sorshi_world, Розалина Рожкова, Вадим Бек, Ульяна Попова
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @weddywood_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
И вопрос по вашему визуалу. Какие эстетики и стили вам ближе? Выберите 1-3:
Элегантная классика58%
Чем романтичнее, тем лучше33%
Деревенский вайб20%
Винтаж и ретро50%
Минимализм34%
Нормкор6%
Антибрайд15%
Откровенный авангард9%
Инфантилизм7%
Люблю всё20%
The shares total 252%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 32,287 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WEDDYWOOD” (@weddywood_ru), 20,341 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/weddywood_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.