Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net +1,254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,063–15,693 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 19:08
15,505
+70
9 Nov 2026, 08:40
15,435
+81
7 Nov 2026, 20:39
15,354
-15
6 Nov 2026, 21:26
15,369
-21
5 Nov 2026, 20:39
15,390
-28
4 Nov 2026, 19:00
15,418
+19
3 Nov 2026, 21:20
15,399
-4
2 Nov 2026, 22:56
15,403
+24
1 Nov 2026, 21:19
15,379
+1
31 Oct 2026, 23:46
15,378
-25
31 Oct 2026, 02:54
15,403
+7
30 Oct 2026, 02:08
15,396
+114
29 Oct 2026, 05:40
15,282
-14
28 Oct 2026, 05:10
15,296
+109
27 Oct 2026, 06:51
15,187
-27
26 Oct 2026, 08:19
15,214
+41
25 Oct 2026, 06:19
15,173
-22
24 Oct 2026, 04:59
15,195
-14
23 Oct 2026, 04:09
15,209
+11
22 Oct 2026, 01:00
15,198
first reading
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.07%
avg views ÷ 15,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.645%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 34 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
151 (29 July 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
47,576
Reactions total
298
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 18:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
612
Videos
157
Links
628
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 42m
Average length
6m 52s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,079 reactions across 110 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
405
37.5%
👍
377
34.9%
🤩
297
27.5%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
اگر AI یک جواب قطعی داد، لزوماً به این معنی نیست که درست است.
مدلهای هوش مصنوعی گاهی اطلاعات اشتباه را با اعتمادبهنفس کامل بیان میکنند. مخصوصاً وقتی سؤال درباره اطلاعات تخصصی، عدد، تاریخ یا موضوعات جدید باشد.
برای جوابهای مهم، از AI بخواه:
«منبع این ادعا را مشخص کن و اگر درباره آن مطمئن نیستی، میزان اطمینانت را بگو. چیزی را که نمیتوانی تأیید کنی، بهعنوان واقعیت قطعی بیان نکن.»
بعد، برای اطلاعات مهم، خودت هم منب…
#انیمیشن_متنی #سرگرمی
🔹نام: راهبرو
🔹آیدی: @RahBroBot
🤖 راهبرو یک ربات سرگرمکننده برای ساخت انیمیشنهای متنی داخل تلگرامه! با استفاده از این ربات میتونی متنهای معمولی رو به نوشتههای متحرک تبدیل کنی و از اونها در پیامهای تلگرام استفاده کنی.
🎞️ ساخت انیمیشنهای متنی
✍️ تبدیل نوشتههای ساده به متنهای متحرک
💬 مناسب برای پیامهای سرگرمی و چت
🛠️ قابل استفاده در پیامهای پشتیبانی
📌 اگر دوست داری پیامهات از حالت…
با مکتبخونه، بورسیهی دانشگاه هاروارد شو!
🎉 مکتبخونه به مناسبت تولد ۱۵ سالگیش یک قرعهکشی ویژه برگزار کرده؛
از بورسیه دوره آموزشی دانشگاه هاروارد به ارزش ۲۰۰۰ دلار گرفته تا اشتراک ChatGPT Plus و مکتبخونه داره جایزه میده.
🔥 علاوه بر جوایز قرعهکشی، تخفیفهای ویژه تولد مکتبخونه هم فعال شده:
▪️ ۸۰٪ تخفیف اشتراک یکساله
▪️ تا ۷۰٪ تخفیف دورههای آموزشی
⏳ مهلت: تا ۲۲ آبان
🔗 برای مشاهده جوایز و شرایط شرکت در قرعه…
🎯 کتاب جامع ۷۰ سناریو مهندسی اجتماعی ۲۰۲۶
🧑💻 نویسنده: پیمان محمدی
💸 قیمت: تخفیف ویژه و رایگان
🧠 هکرها همیشه کدها را نمیشکنند؛ گاهی ذهن انسان را هدف میگیرند!
با گسترش هوش مصنوعی، کلون بلادرنگ صدا، دیپفیک و روشهای جدید فریب، تشخیص یک حمله مهندسی اجتماعی سختتر از همیشه شده است.
📚 در این کتاب با ۷۰ سناریوی واقعی نفوذ آشنا میشوید و یاد میگیرید چگونه تهدیدها را شناسایی و در برابر آنها دفاع کنید:
✅ بررسی ۷۰ س…
هر ابزار هوش مصنوعی برای انجام یک کار ساخته شده اگه بدونی برای هر کاری باید سراغ کدوم ابزار بری، میتونی کلی در زمانت صرفهجویی کنی.
Claude Code
برای برنامهنویسی و کدنویسی
Claude
برای ساخت وبسایت
OpenSEO
برای تحلیل و دادههای سئو
Scrapingg
برای استخراج اطلاعات از سایتها
Retell AI
برای ساخت ایجنت صوتی و مکالمه هوشمند
Obsidian
برای ثبت و سازماندهی ایدهها
Notion
برای مدیریت و نظم دادن به کارها
Clay
برای جذب سرنخ و…
🔍 آیا گوگل همه چیزِ ما را ذخیره میکند؟!
یه ابزار و سایت خیلی جالب و در عین حال عجیب براتون آوردم که شاید از دیدنش شوکه بشید!
اگر وارد لینک زیر بشید، تاریخچه تمام جستجوهایی که تا حالا تو گوگل انجام دادید رو براتون میاره؛ حتی اونایی که خودتون دستی پاکشون کرده بودید! 😱
🔗 https://myactivity.google.com
به نظرتون گوگل بزرگترین جاسوس قرنه یا یه دستیار همهفنحریف؟ شما هم امتحان کنید و نتیجه رو ببینید!
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔚#ترفند …
یادگیری پیشرفته انگلیسی با اخبار VOA
🔻JOIN
با کانال آراء و مطالب حقوقی به روز باشید
🔻JOIN
کتب صوتی نایاب / زندگینامۀ مشاهیر و...
🔻JOIN
همه کتاب های صوتی و پی دی اف...
🔻JOIN
آرشیو جامع کتابخانه مجازی
🔻JOIN
بيشتر بدانيم بهتر زندگى كنيم
🔻JOIN
پادکست رایگان انگلیسی
🔻JOIN
دنیای کتاب صوتی و PDF
🔻JOIN
صفر تا صد هک و امنیت
🔻JOIN
انگلیسی با فیلم و داستان
🔻JOIN
پکیج های ناب بورسی و موفقیت
🔻JOIN
هوش مصنوعی | یادگیری …
طراحی لوگو و برندبوک با هوش مصنوعی، به کمک یک ابزار اوپنسورس
➕با ابزار Logo Design Skill میتونید از طریق دستیارهای هوش مصنوعی مثل Cursor، Claude Code، Gemini و Copilot برای پروژههاتون لوگو طراحی کنید.
استفاده از بیش از ۱۴۰۰ نمونه لوگوی استاندارد برای ایدهپردازی
بررسی لوگوهای رقبا برای جلوگیری از طرحهای تکراری
خروجی وکتور و قابل ویرایش با فرمت SVG
ساخت نسخههای مختلف لوگو برای حالت روشن، تاریک و تکرنگ
تحویل…
عکس قدیمی داری؟ این بار فقط رنگیاش نکن؛ زندهاش کن.
عکسهای قدیمی معمولاً رنگ و نور مناسبی ندارن، اما میتونی با AI ظاهرشون رو طبیعیتر و باکیفیتتر کنی.
این Prompt رو امتحان کن:
«این عکس قدیمی را بازسازی کن. خطوخش، لکه، نویز و تاری را کاهش بده و جزئیات تصویر را تا حد ممکن بازیابی کن. نور و کنتراست را طبیعی کن و در صورت سیاهوسفید بودن، رنگها را واقعگرایانه اضافه کن. چهره و ویژگیهای اصلی افراد را تغییر نده و از …
👀 نمیدونستم مایکروسافت یه صفحه کامل از ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی رایگان داره!
با این ابزارها میتونی کارهای مختلفی انجام بدی، مثلاً:
🎨 ساخت استیکر
🖼 ویرایش عکس
🏠 طراحی دکوراسیون و فضای اتاق
📱 ساخت پست برای شبکههای اجتماعی
🤖 و کلی ابزار هوش مصنوعی دیگه!
بعضی از این ابزارها واقعاً کاربردیان و ارزش امتحان کردن دارن. 👌
🔗 مشاهده ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی مایکروسافت:
https://www.bing.com/tools/ai
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
🔚#ترفند و #هوش_مصنوعی و…
❤🔥1👍1🤩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @LEGENDARYHACKIR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 8 posts on @LEGENDARYHACKIR as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 103 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
3
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@LEGENDARYHACKIR named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@ai_pack named in 2 posts, 12 August 2026 – 21 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@ir_blackcode named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 14 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
@network_secsnap named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@admin_ad named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
• AI & Python • @AIPyth0n · 22,537 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 September 2026
کتاب وجزوه دانشجویی📚 @Jozve_Com · 39,508 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
هوش مصنوعی| علم داده @AILearnCamp · 21,253 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 October 2026
جزوه دانشجویی @jozveh_daneshjoyi · 32,300 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
ذِهـ،نِ پــوچْ؛ @ZehnePouch · 20,618 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
اخبار دانشجویی @Daneshjou_news · 19,024 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 October 2026
کتاب دانشجویی @ketab_daneshjoyi · 26,566 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 11 September 2026
⌟ ایلومیناتی⌜ @iluminatim · 29,275 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 7 September 2026
بورس و ارز با رابین هود @rabinhod_arz · 17,402 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 5 October 2026
📚کتاب دانشگاهی📚 @ketab_University · 31,939 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LEGEND APK | هوش مصنوعی و ترفند” (@LEGENDARYHACKIR), 15,505 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LEGENDARYHACKIR.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.